Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,477
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Lowkirkenuinely we've been edging for way too long with these chopped ass delulu setups, feeling like we sisyphus fr; we need the Euro to lock in and start looksmaxxing to reach its Lowkirkentologicalockedinflowstate and show a NS that finally rizzes up some gul moisture and show a storm so we can finally get return to our goon caves and end this snow edging streak. 67

Don't bring this bullshit into our forum me and @bncho could ruin every thread here if we wanted to. This is your warning. 

My eyes lit up when I saw I was pinged by @SnowenOutThere, and it lit up even more when I saw what he sent. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Lowkirkenuinely we've been edging for way too long with these chopped ass delulu setups, feeling like we sisyphus fr; we need the Euro to lock in and start looksmaxxing to reach its Lowkirkentologicalockedinflowstate and show a NS that finally rizzes up some gul moisture and show a storm so we can finally get return to our goon caves and end this snow edging streak. 67

Don't bring this bullshit into our forum me and @bncho could ruin every thread here if we wanted to. This is your warning. 

Fr fr this Euro run be bussin at the end.  It did bring the rizz no cap.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, winter_warlock said:

Well it's only 11 days out as opposed to  15 so has a little more credibility. And it has been showing for a while

actually not to weenie out but the euro develops the storm at 192-198 lol

  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Borrowing this from Will in the SNE thread

20 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Ok these are the cold events that @dendrite and I like to track. Cold worth tracking. 
 

Pure clown range fantasy but it’s so anomalous its worth posting….
 

Not sure I’ve seen -30C at 925 over such a large area. This would be almost perfect too if the timing happened this way because you wouldn’t get the cheap midnight high. Real push arrives between 00z-06z and its so strong that we get like a Xmas 1980 type daytime with highs near -10F even over interior SNE. 
 

image.png.945eb8c166688d16f7cb219822594de5.png
 

image.png.552e6d378a92102b5f6d63fabb649439.png
 

image.png.1e09a5494a0daa46118a814bec0a1fe5.png

 

  • Like 1
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, yoda said:

Borrowing this from Will in the SNE thread

 

Out in weenie land but Euro showing a high of 3F for DC on the 27th and a low of -10F on the 28th. Can't see I've seen that modeled by the Euro at any range lol

  • Like 1
  • no 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eduggs said:

It's never simple. Overrunning also gives you sleet, freezing rain, or rain. And wave interactions can always apply regardless of synoptic setup.

Threats look simpler in the long range because of the ensemble averaging effect. So if you overlay the height field with the precipitation field, it often looks like basic overrunning with flat mid-levels. By the time you get closer to the threat, the ensemble spread significantly narrows, the amplitude of the waves increase, and you see the real synoptic complexity.

At the risk of semantics...SO perhaps not "simple" but rather simplER? That is if you were to compare overruning to a phase event which is easiER? @CAPE or anybody else have thoughts on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro on the 25th is much better than the GFS on the 28th.

Mobile to Charleston to OBX with cold high pressure to the north would work!

Warning level accumulations with 850 temperatures well down in the 20's and falling would rule out mixing issues.

Considering this is 9 days out I will give it a 40% chance of verifying.  If still populating with significance at 24 hrs, that 40% can increase to 60%.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormy said:

Euro on the 25th is much better than the GFS on the 28th.

Mobile to Charleston to OBX with cold high pressure to the north would work!

Warning level accumulations with 850 temperatures well down in the 20's and falling would rule out mixing issues.

Considering this is 9 days out I will give it a 40% chance of verifying.  If still populating with significance at 24 hrs, that 40% can increase to 60%.

40% at day 9 huh? That is impressive lol 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

At the risk of semantics...SO perhaps not "simple" but rather simplER? That is if you were to compare overruning to a phase event which is EASIER? @CAPE or somebody help me out here, lol

See the panel I posted above. See the wall of HP to the north? Wont be so many pieces of vorticity flying around and digging southward, so simpler perhaps.

Look at what we have for the upcoming (non) event compared the advertised h5 look for around the 24th-

1768726800-Sjc44O2rbpI.png

1769277600-7zX4wmtFn70.png

Still could have some vorticity rotating southward from the TPV, and that would provide confluence as the shortwave in the SW moves eastward- too much of that could be suppressive. There are always obstacles to our ultimate goal lol.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

the Pacific trough pumps the PNA... that's part of the reason why it usually torches after big storms as the jet overextends

This... the trough is there on our big storm composite look...which as you say is why our big storms tend to come at the end of cold periods and are usually followed by moderation...because the trough there temporarily creates the perfect longwave configuration for a big amplification along the east coast but also leads to warmer air invading the CONUS shortly after...but it doesn't necessarily always have to torch or the warmup doesn't have to last...depends how things evolve from there.  

But if we do finally get a big snowstorm I'm gonna hit the first person who says "But it all melted a week later" over the head with a tack hammer.  

  • Like 4
  • Haha 2
  • 100% 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ji said:

we were promised warmer and wetter winters with you know.....now they are colder and cant even buy a rain drop

Cold dry winters were always a thing.... but it hurts that much more when 80% of our winters are warm now...we can't afford to waste cold ones.  

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

Not great to see that trough build in so quickly over Alaska?

Imho thats going to be more an Aleutian low signal than an Alaska proper vortex. That look presented actually gets us in +PNA territory and verbatim would move the PNA ridge axis near the benchmark (Idaho iirc). I would be ok with the epo easing a bit as this look takes shape going into the waning days of Jan/early Feb.

One thing seems certain at least, anyone that declared winter over is likely in for a rude awakening shortly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

This... the trough is there on our big storm composite look...which as you say is why our big storms tend to come at the end of cold periods and are usually followed by moderation...because the trough there temporarily creates the perfect longwave configuration for a big amplification along the east coast but also leads to warmer air invading the CONUS shortly after...but it doesn't necessarily always have to torch or the warmup doesn't have to last...depends how things evolve from there.  

But if we do finally get a big snowstorm I'm gonna hit the first person who says "But it all melted a week later" over the head with a tack hammer.  

Sledgehammer and we all know it would probably be Ji 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

At the risk of semantics...SO perhaps not "simple" but rather simplER? That is if you were to compare overruning to a phase event which is easiER? @CAPE or anybody else have thoughts on that?

Where I agree with you is that if you pre-define a synoptic setup as simple (moist southerly flow into a cold dome), then it is comparatively simple. We do get hung up on semantics. But I also think we oversimplify and broad-brush weather events with terms that are too general. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

Oddly enough once the snow stops he doesn't care.  He will complain 3 days after a HECS though if there is nothing else to track on the models  

He promised not till next December though if we get this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Oddly enough once the snow stops he doesn't care.  He will complain 3 days after a HECS though if there is nothing else to track on the models  

Exactly how I feel honestly. It’s cool for a day. I guess I don’t want it to be 70 right after but nothing cures the post-storm sadness like something lined up after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...