Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,473
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kmsrocknj
    Newest Member
    kmsrocknj
    Joined

January 2026 regional war/obs/disco thread


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I think part of it is the behavior of the MJO deconstructiveluy interfering with major east coast cyclogenesis...but agree on overattribution.

The MJO theory is definitely more sound in my eyes than “we can’t phase in the fast flow” theory. I still think that one is likely temporary though much like other flavor of the month theories in the past 2 decades. 
 

This winter seems to be bucking the chronic MJO problem of 2022-2025 but yet we still can’t buy a good system. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

The MJO theory is definitely more sound in my eyes than “we can’t phase in the fast flow” theory. I still think that one is likely temporary though much like other flavor of the month theories in the past 2 decades. 
 

This winter seems to be bucking the chronic MJO problem of 2022-2025 but yet we still can’t buy a good system. 

Not as much as you think....models have still been far too zealous with phase 8 residence time and amplification....I worked this into my outlook and called BS in December, which was correct. A lot of it is due to the west warm pool biasing convection out there, and I do think it will shift eventually.

Thus SSTS and conditions near the ground can reenforce a given atmospheric regime in the absence of a major catalyst for change. When considering the graphic below, it is apparent that the largest increase in oceanic heat content has occurred in the western Pacific, with a secondary area off of the northeast US coast to the south of Newfoundland.
 
 
AVvXsEgfoTds4h60N8h8JP2mf6s-fYhsgJpZbQQ2
These areas are not coincidental and are likely a byproduct of both the prevailing trades as regulated by the Walker Cycle (West Pacific), and perhaps the melting of sea ice slowing the warming in the higher latitudes (near New Foundland).
 
AVvXsEjzEOTD93RKuUvt4BYdZbm5FzsL35yelkb7
These maxima of heat content are in areas that correlate with both +WPO and +NAO.
 
AVvXsEhpI1mhY5oR2ZsJRToNAnY7BXouz-3HH3JL
 
Accordingly, there has indeed been an increased tendency towards the DJFM winter period being biased towards +WPO/+NAO in the mean that has been remarkably evident since the major El Niño event of 2015-2016 accelerated the warming. In fact, since 2016, only two seasons have averaged a -WPO (2016-2017, 2021-2022) and just one season has averaged a -NAO (2020-2021). This would seem to imply that this is at least partially attributable to some sort of feedback accentuated by the stored ocean heat content that is a byproduct of climate change. Note the similarity to the West Pacific Oscillation (WPO) correlation map in terms of both temps, as well as the 500mb pattern over the US during DM period over the course of the past decade, which validates the premise that the west Pacific has been the prevailing catalyst in the pattern.
 
AVvXsEh1g5RDQ2SYElEgjfHtGLjwA_93gEgKoGlE
AVvXsEjW9VYGhhHaqbZPo_1ULL7dlUx4ikBzEof7
 
While the vast majority of the country has been running above the 1951-2010 climatology base owed to the general background warming, it is clear how the magnitude of said warmth is weighted disproportionately in that it is much more intense across the eastern portion of the country. The eastern half of the country has been running several degrees warmer than average, while areas of the Pacific north west coast hardly at all. This is due at least in part to the aforementioned heat maximum over the west Pacific, which has come to be known as the West Pacific Warm Pool. This immense warmer body of water, which is likely attributable to some combination of climate change and natural variation, has caused the convective pattern known as the Madden Jullian Oscillation (MJO) to spend an inordinately excessive amount of time in the maritime continent (MC) phases of 4-7 as a result of the aforementioned tropical convective processes that act to budget and redistribute the immense amount of stored heat around the globe. 
 
AVvXsEgySoFzVL3ybqap_V9Qem0ELxzbgzdgYBWJ
These are phases that correlate with greater heights and warmer weather over the eastern half of the country during the winter season, which is precisely what has occurred in the mean over this span of time.
 
AVvXsEhBZB8M8-RwRvr8fb7zmu5_aMAVslAucXhF
 
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

just based on that, the concept may be more related to placement or displacement of the jet versus the actually speed...though speed probably more of a factor in relation to jet streaks versus the jet as a whole.

Well, the gradient between the stagnant cold over Siberia and warmth east of Japan not only accentuates the jet, but emphasizes the n PAC placement ...it goes hand-in-hand. That is starting to change...

The Limitation of Traditional Conceptualizations In A Warming Climate

 

The Relative Ocean Nino Index (RONI) attempts to remove the trend due to global warming in an effort to produce a measure that is of more direct relevance to changes in tropical convection driven by SST anomalies, rather than the general warming around the globe. This is similar to the issues addressed with respect to the original PDO patterns in that the general background warming alters these traditional relationships. Just as the west Pacific warm pool enhances the general cold phase of the Pacific despite the general warming along the coast of the western CONUS, it also strengthens the proclivity for the MJO to frequent the MC in a similar fashion to canonical La Nina despite any competing forces. In this case, the competing force is perhaps some heightened convection and vertical ascent in the vicinity of the dateline relative to what would normally be expected for a cool ENSO event. Thus it is probably unreasonable to expect as consistently of a cold pattern as seen in an older analog, such as 1995-1996, due to the increased baseline tendency for MC forcing and Pacific jet extensions. Note the absence of subsidence in the vicinity of the dateline in the traditional weak and east-based La Niña composites.
 
AVvXsEgFOQtvpsvesicA7a6Vscii9sGKvpl-2Rds
 
However, the most recent weak and east-based events are not devoid of this Modoki like subsidence in this area, rather it is just more subdued. 
 
AVvXsEjwR1Pyq2dmYuyJIiV5EnuH-oK2BMDp8Kof

This is indicative of considerable periods of MC forcing and Pacific jet extensions, albeit less propounded than in a canonical La Niña that is more west-based. This is also illustrated by the aforementioned increase in the Pacific jet over time.
 
AVvXsEhN7mEPLpO5TVH5VbKeXxUXg-x80i5jEjhP

How this manifests in terms of the RONI is that these modern La Niña events often have stronger RONI values due to the west Pacific warm pool accentuating the cool ENSO influence.
 
AVvXsEgZWYtq4WmXY8dJF2r32pE4UbXMuATgfrEP
 
This is what feedbacks into the pattern that reenforces the cold over Siberia and warmth east of Japan that embodies the +WPO regime, and strengthens the jet.
 
AVvXsEjOxZERc_Lgp7Pyeipd42lugcFLzVguExyZ
 
Below is the progression over the past quarter of a century in the north Pacific relative to the intensity of the Aleutian low, as the attendant Hadley Cell has continued to expand northward.
 
early.png
 
mid.png
late.png

 
 
Note that this western Pacific warmth was less pronounced in the older La Nina analog composite, which is why the jet was weaker in the mean.
 
AVvXsEjYhUKEFwo86BwImuVnx7roC_Dyfp14EbNm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, dendrite said:

We’re trying to get @radarmanpond hockey tournaments into May

I've refrained from chiming in lately but the fact is you have to play the hand you're dealt.  If we had super snowy and warm we'd be skiing.  If we had early Jan 2007 we'd be out taking walks.  Of those who complain most bitterly I'm not sure they've ever posted evidence of going outside in the winter in any conditions.  The south beckons.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Feb 13th 2016 diamond dust then synoptic 

Screenshot_20260114_094609_Gallery.jpg

I don’t think anyone had DD from that airmass in SNE. Wasn’t it really windy? I remember ORH doing -10° or something in that. DD is basically the frozen form of fog…a cirrus cloud at the sfc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The persistent +WPO portion has obviously started to shift already, and the behavior of the MJO will eventually follow suite.....but that is lagging, which is at least part of the reason why we still have a dearth of large east coast storms despite a N Pac more conducive to cold...also some plane bad luck, I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, radarman said:

I've refrained from chiming in lately but the fact is you have to play the hand you're dealt.  If we had super snowy and warm we'd be skiing.  If we had early Jan 2007 we'd be out taking walks.  Of those who complain most bitterly I'm not sure they've ever posted evidence of going outside in the winter in any conditions.  The south beckons.

I like big cold…I just worry about my birds and plants. There’s just something about going out in a calm -20° or colder airmass and breathing it in. 0°F is cold, but when you push -30 it’s on another level. 

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I like big cold…I just worry about my birds and plants. There’s just something about going out in a calm -20° or colder airmass and breathing it in. 0°F is cold, but when you push -30 it’s on another level. 

When I first became introduced to forecast models and I'd see those "white blob" like -30F 850 temps I think it was from Plymouth models...I used to open my freezer and suck in the air as hard as I could to prepare for breathing in that cold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

I saw diamond dust for the first time a few weeks ago and it was so cool.

A lot of people confuse true DD with very light snow. It can get tricky in the mountains too because at cold temps even with weak lift you can squeeze out some snowflakes even with barely the hint of a cloud. But DD is simply ice fog. I think the Inuit term for it was pogonip.

But as you know it’s difficult to freeze tiny water droplets because of their curvature. You need really cold temps to get them to spontaneously freeze. That’s why it’s usually around -30 or colder and in valleys so it can saturate and go immediately to ice form instead of supercooled droplets. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...