Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,399
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SouthOaklandCtyWX
    Newest Member
    SouthOaklandCtyWX
    Joined

Minor snow possible sunday 12/14/25


WeatherGeek2025
 Share

Recommended Posts

Becoming guardedly optimistic we get something here but we still have to watch over the next 24 hours given the chaotic pattern. Slight chance it amps a little more and can produce a 3-5” type event but overall it looks weak and more of a 1-3” deal. But it could still shear out because of the fast flow or be suppressed. We just have to watch. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

NAM would of course be the best case outcome for me but it’s the NAM. 

Thankfully that model is about to go bye bye forever soon. The only time it’s ever good is with warm noses. Other than that, good riddance

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM is an outlier right now in the upper levels. It shows a trof structure further west and less positively tilted than everything else. But it also trended better than 6z. It would be very encouraging to see big moves towards this today.

The 12z NAM would also feel a lot snowier than what most think of when they see 3-6". That's weekend, daytime snow with cold 925mb temps, near freezing surface, and probable banding. It's a great and unlikely outcome.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

why even bother with snowmaps? use liquid and then apply 10:1 or slightly above / below depending on DGZ and dynamics. this event would produce 12-15:1 pretty easily on the northern end of the precip shield; these events usually do so

That's why I almost always post the 10:1 maps, as those give you easy-to-calculate QPF too and to do one's own ratio adjustments, as Kuchera generally sucks as a snow prediction algorithm.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RU848789 said:

That's why I almost always post the 10:1 maps, as those give you easy-to-calculate QPF too and to do one's own ratio adjustments, as Kuchera generally sucks as a snow prediction algorithm.  

The RGEM pivotal map I linked was 10:1 ratios 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

Rgem is very solid. 3 to 5 for most. Less north

The RGEM clearly has less precipitation than the NAM. The RGEM is around 0.3 liquid for the greater metro area with a little more in C/SNJ and a little less in NWNJ and SENY. The NAM is double that... around 0.6 liquid for all of the metro, LI, and NENJ, with less north and south.

The NAM (likely overdone) is a great run. The RGEM is a good run. Both were encouraging relative to last night's runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LoboLeader1 said:

We need a negative tilted trough.

We’re not getting that with this setup-it’s too fast and progressive, and the PV is pressing south. We have to hope for a slightly steeper ridge out west that can allow for our system to dig a little more and amplify. But in the end there’s a ceiling of probably what the RGEM or NAM have since this will be in and out in a hurry. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...