Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,426
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    TheWhiteStuff
    Newest Member
    TheWhiteStuff
    Joined

December 2025 regional war/obs/disco thread


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, weatherwiz said:

Someone in PA is going to get some significant icing. 

I don't see much room for this to get any farther north but SW CT may still be in the game for accumulating snow.

We still have tomorrow and Thursday and most of the day Friday before the system comes into the area. Most seem to be writing this off because of the southward push on the models. I'm not saying this is definitely going to come north again, but there's a good chance that it will tick back North again, and even to a point where we're all in the game. I would say if this doesn't change by Thursday evening, it's a goner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Unreal that it went from a rain event to a whiff.

Whenever I shake my head in disgust I just remind myself that it's a failure of imagination. Since 2017-18 winter has found the most creative and excruciating ways possible to pork SNE. A few days ago we were worried about a mild end to December, and now there's so much cold press a SNE rainer is now congrats DC to NYC. It's unreal. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Who do we need to sacrifice?

I hadn't realized that SSW in latter November was barely a reversal....Larry pointed it out to me in the ENSO thread. I think it's largely moot, anyway....I shouldn't have dismissed the eventual, lagged implications of that, which is why I missed this upcoming period of -NAO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Whenever I shake my head in disgust I just remind myself that it's a failure of imagination. Since 2017-18 winter has found the most creative and excruciating ways possible to pork SNE. A few days ago we were worried about a mild end to December, and now there's so much cold press a SNE rainer is now congrats DC to NYC. It's unreal. 

Much of  SENY just north of the city will have 20-30” of snow this December after Saturday AM if the gfs verifies. While SNE is around 1-5” excluding the mountains. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Whenever I shake my head in disgust I just remind myself that it's a failure of imagination. Since 2017-18 winter has found the most creative and excruciating ways possible to pork SNE. A few days ago we were worried about a mild end to December, and now there's so much cold press a SNE rainer is now congrats DC to NYC. It's unreal. 

If this January is like last January, I'm going to have someone string me up by my ball bag and just leave me swaying in the wind....just end it.

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it wasn't a canonical SSW behavior in the sense that there was no propagation for one. 

But, we had a near or at historic solar storm around then. I'm entertaining the possibility that the models were caught off guard by the solar flux arriving around the time they were modeling an intrusion event, and irradiating/breaking up crucial ozone densities - ozone is an important thermal conductor in the physics.

The other aspect ...as I pointed this out at the time, it was not very clear in the modeling whether it was emerging above 50hPa level.  It appeared to actually to be a punch up from the below from the topospheric bulge associated with the ( at the time) still being modeled N. Pacific height anomaly - they certainly did a good job with that ... just fantastically persistent feature.  It resulted cold loading into the N/A either way so ... who's quibbling.  

I think there was some interpretation misuse going on at the time et al. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

it wasn't a canonical SSW in the sense that there was no propagation for one. 

But, we had a near or at historic solar storm and I'm entertaining the possibility that the models were caught off guard by the solar flux arriving around the time they were modeling an intrusion event.

The other aspect ...as I pointed this out at the time, it was not very clear in the modeling whether it was emerging above 50hPa level.  It appeared to actually to be a punch up from the below from the topospheric bulge associated with the ( at the time) still being modeled N. Pacific height anomaly - they certainly did a good job with that ... just fantastically persistent feature.   

I think there was some interpretation misuse going on at the time et al. 

Definitely bottom up.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Whenever I shake my head in disgust I just remind myself that it's a failure of imagination. Since 2017-18 winter has found the most creative and excruciating ways possible to pork SNE. A few days ago we were worried about a mild end to December, and now there's so much cold press a SNE rainer is now congrats DC to NYC. It's unreal. 

I might even whiff if the models dont stop trending south.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Same result, though...still got the lagged NAO.

Agreed.  I added this sentiment to that missive, " It resulted cold loading into the N/A either way so ... who's quibbling.  " 

But also, the Pacific --> N. America total wave signature is what creates the NAO btw.   Not you per se, but folks may save some frustration if they finally get their minds wrapped around that.  It's the mechanics downstream from the PNA domains idiosyncratic wave distribution.  One of the reasons it's so difficult for the models is because it's largely driven to emergence through non-linear function - those that are applying forcing in a transitive interference, which are not visible.    Just sayn'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Agreed.  I added this sentiment to that missive, " It resulted cold loading into the N/A either way so ... who's quibbling.  " 

But also, the Pacific --> N. America total wave signature is what creates the NAO btw.   Not you per se, but folks may save some frustration if they finally get their minds wrapped around that.  It's the mechanics downstream from the PNA domains idiosyncratic wave distribution.  One of the reasons it's so difficult for the models is because it's largely driven to emergence through non-linear function - those that are applying forcing in a transitive mode that is often not visible.    Just sayn'

Should be me....I struggle to wrap my mind around that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Pistol to head?     this January will be very close to:

image.png.4abbfc5d35b793760329dc9b7d6ff638.png    ...quick specific to that range, too.

Implication being that they are all the same due to CC, but thing is they really aren't....I can tell you right now now this month won't be January 2024 or January 2020. Probably closer to 2022.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Should be me....I struggle to wrap my mind around that.

ooh ooh I can help.   

Image a rope, and your snapping one end ... you'll see a wave move along the rope?  

that is the linear function/wave propagation.   Now imagine that there are multiple wave functions propagating at once.  You might have seen this experience in science... but what happens is the waves organize into a patterns that so long as the input force is proximal to steady, will then enter what is called 'resonance' - that resonance is a predictable standing wave event.   

What we are seeing in the Pacific northern arc out there is a remarkable case of resonance occurring at very large synoptic scale... the NAO that downs stream of that as a secondary resonance node on the "rope".      

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Implication being that they are all the same due to CC, but thing is they really aren't....I can tell you right now now this month won't be January 2024 or January 2020. Probably closer to 2022.

hahahaha.... damn!  thought I got one past you.   

That part of it's a chode tug just cause I was being a dick, but I do see similarities among these years whether we/you/I want to see it or admit or not - and... I don't claim that it is CC outright.  I am open to that being the case but more seriously, there was a speed/velocity saturation in the flow every one of these years that is/was/still is near the top of the geophysical ceiling during winter core.   

There's a reason all these air-land airline speed records have been set in the last 10 to 15 years, for those intercontinental flights over the N Pac and Atlantic. It's because they're traveling in the slip stream of mega jets, where they have to open the throttle and fly very fast to maintain lift ... which requires near sonic speeds relative to the stationary E... It's 200 kt 300 mb wind flow ... you gotta move the 60 ton vehicle at 600 mph to maintain the air-relative 500 whatever mph it is they need to stay fuel efficient ...etc.  

So regardless of the reason ( CC or the CD ) ... It's probably going to be observable in January ...again.  It's based upon persistence for now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

hahahaha.... damn!  thought I got one past you.   

That part of it's a chode tug just cause I was being a dick, but I do see similarities among these years whether we/you/I want to see it or admit or not - and... I don't claim that it is CC outright.  I am open to that being the case but more seriously, there was a speed/velocity saturation in the flow every one of these years that is/was/still is near the top of the geophysical ceiling during winter core.   

There's a reason all these air-land airline speed records have been set in the last 10 to 15 years, for those intercontinental flights over the N Pac and Atlantic. It's because they're traveling in the slip stream of mega jets, where they have to open the throttle and fly very fast to maintain lift ... which requires near sonic speeds relative to the stationary E... It's 200 kt 300 mb wind flow ... you gotta move the 60 ton vehicle at 600 mph to maintain the air-relative 500 whatever mph it is they need to stay fuel efficient ...etc.  

So regardless of the reason ( CC or the CD ) ... It's probably going to be observable in January ...again.  It's based upon persistence for now. 

Yes, the speed of flow is a common theme...I thought you meant the overall patterns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...