Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

December 2023


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, FrankRizz said:

Is that for Monday/Tuesday or the Dec 14th?

This coming Monday. The panels posted are for Monday afternoon and evening. Like Will said though, this has bounced around so much on the guidance it’s really not worth doing anything other than analyzing the synoptic trend. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, FrankRizz said:

Is that for Monday/Tuesday or the Dec 14th?

image.png.de590165fb4a1cb27ef053e5e10f43de.png

I interpret these as:

Init: = Initialized (?). When the data was run to create the image

12Z = in Zulu/GMT time (7am EST)

29NOV2023 = date data was processed/run to create image

126hr = number of hours out into the future from the initialized date/time

Valid = when the image is "valid" for

Mon = Monday

18Z = in Zulu/GMT time (1pm EST)

04DEC2023 = date for when the image/data is forecasting/predicting for

 

So yes, the valid time is posted on the image and in this case, 7am EST Monday December 4, 2023.

If I've gotten any of these wrong, someone can please correct me.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

IMG_9749.png.bab93212aee1441844355ce6d6470779.pngIMG_9750.png.d90d5d602a104416fd74e0698279f979.png

 

Normally we’d be pumped at a 126-132 solution on the euro but this thing  has been changing every run so it’s prob gonna be a couple more cycles before confidence is high  

 

Solid threat for ski areas, but temps look too marginal for the coastal plain. In December I’d like to see modeled temps in the mid to upper 20s instead of low to mid 30s before I jump on board for my area. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Layman said:

image.png.de590165fb4a1cb27ef053e5e10f43de.png

I interpret these as:

Init: = Initialized (?). When the data was run to create the image

12Z = time, noon (in Zulu/Military/24hr time)

29NOV2023 = date data was processed/run to create image

126hr = number of hours out into the future from the initialized date/time

Valid = when the image is "valid" for

Mon = Monday

18Z = 8pm EST time (in Zulu/Military/24hr time)

04DEC2023 = date for when the image/data is forecasting/predicting for

 

So yes, the valid time is posted on the image and in this case, 8pm Monday evening December 4, 2023.

If I've gotten any of these wrong, someone can please correct me.

 

Times are zulu/GMT...not EST.

12z is 7am EST and 18z is 1pm EST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

That’s how you run an early season snowstorm down here. Thread the needle 

With the December Atlantic ssts I need to see surface temps in the mid to upper 20s before jumping on board. Marginal events do not work for us in December. When you have marginal thermal profiles at this time of year, take the under on those 10:1 maps. That said, I’m glad ski areas are getting hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway ... I suspect the first wave is the dominant.  The only reason I do is because of history; more often than not in these wave contention scenarios the lead wave ends up the one that gets the job done. 

The 2nd wave 'crowding' along in the flow 'kind of' also fits into the model lensing/'magnification' aspect of too much longer range amplitude correcting.  If/when they necessarily back off, that opens up the flow when it corrects and then the lead wave takes over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, George001 said:

Solid threat for ski areas, but temps look too marginal for the coastal plain. In December I’d like to see modeled temps in the mid to upper 20s instead of low to mid 30s before I jump on board for my area. 

True, but we can still cash in when we have the upper 20's and low 30s a t this time of year. The mid 30 would be toward the Boston and SouthShore areas for sure but if the dynamics take over it would start as a mix, then a wet sleety snow for those areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FrankRizz said:

Is that for Monday/Tuesday or the Dec 14th?

Beer

22 minutes ago, George001 said:

Solid threat for ski areas, but temps look too marginal for the coastal plain. In December I’d like to see modeled temps in the mid to upper 20s instead of low to mid 30s before I jump on board for my area. 

More beer

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, iceman1 said:

fact is i got nothing  last year  if you dont like my post sorry move on i am just stating that my area got crap for snow all winter 

Can't argue about how bad last winter was for most of SNE, but your response to Ray, below, infers the same for this winter, with no evidence offered.  Too early to throw in the towel.
 

  4 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

We're all in agreement snow will be a tall task during the first two weeks of the month in SNE.

and the last 2 weeks and Jan and so on 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

There are still a few members trying for Dec 6th too. Not as many as 12/4 but still worth keeping an eye on. 

Like was discussed yesterday, 12/6 prob has the best airmass and best “shot” for the coastal plain, but the OP euro shows how 12/4 could work.

Not surprising the ensembles are less enthusiastic about SNE snow on 12/4. OP run is probably on the snowy side of the suite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Greg said:

True, but we can still cash in when we have the upper 20's and low 30s a t this time of year. The mid 30 would be toward the Boston and SouthShore areas for sure but if the dynamics take over it would start as a mix, then a wet sleety snow for those areas.

It’s possible, but betting on dynamics to overcome a marginal airmass is a losing proposition more often than not. The return rate for these marginal types of events is much lower than it is when we have a better airmass in place. The problem is a stronger more phased storm will be more tucked, and draw in more mild air. There is a window where it’s just phased enough to dynamically cool the column but also not so phased the low tucks in to much, but that window is very small.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tamarack said:

Can't argue about how bad last winter was for most of SNE, but your response to Ray, below, infers the same for this winter, with no evidence offered.  Too early to throw in the towel.
 

  4 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

We're all in agreement snow will be a tall task during the first two weeks of the month in SNE.

and the last 2 weeks and Jan and so on 

And this was my exact point to him…but he couldn’t figure it out.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...