Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,511
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Monitoring a potential important TV to East Coastal storm: Jan 17


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

For those of you with the Kocin / Uccellini Northeast Snowstorms Volume II - The Card book available, check out the Feb. 15-17, 1958 storm.  Very close surface and 500 mb match for the pre-storm 48 hours period onward to the day of the event.  The result was widespread 9 to 16" amounts across SNE with a heavy deformation band of 20 to 36 inches running northeast across eastern PA, eastern NY on into srn VT /  central NH...  It was a slower mover than the upcoming event is likely to be, but good features analog match?

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FXWX said:

For those of you with the Kocin / Uccellini Northeast Snowstorms Volume II - The Card book available, check out the Feb. 15-17, 1958 storm.  Very close surface and 500 mb match for the pre-storm 48 hours period onward to the day of the event.  The result was widespread 9 to 16" amounts across SNE with a heavy deformation band of 20 to 36 inches running northeast across eastern PA, eastern NY on into srn VT /  central NH...  It was a slower mover than the upcoming event is likely to be, but good features analog match?

I’m wondering if this one may slow some in future cycles … 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FXWX said:

For those of you with the Kocin / Uccellini Northeast Snowstorms Volume II - The Card book available, check out the Feb. 15-17, 1958 storm.  Very close surface and 500 mb match for the pre-storm 48 hours period onward to the day of the event.  The result was widespread 9 to 16" amounts across SNE with a heavy deformation band of 20 to 36 inches running northeast across eastern PA, eastern NY on into srn VT /  central NH...  It was a slower mover than the upcoming event is likely to be, but good features analog match?

Actually about what I envision attm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z EPS showing some interesting things when it comes to the EFI.

No shading indicates that less than half of the members forecast an extreme snowfall for the 5 weeks centered on this date. BUT the contours (especially above 1) indicate that the members that do forecast the most snowfall (i.e. 90th percentile of EPS member forecast) those members are fairly extreme. 

ens_2022011112_ne_24h_sfi_SFC_156.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

12z EPS showing some interesting things when it comes to the EFI.

No shading indicates that less than half of the members forecast an extreme snowfall for the 5 weeks centered on this date. BUT the contours (especially above 1) indicate that the members that do forecast the most snowfall (i.e. 90th percentile of EPS member forecast) those members are fairly extreme. 

ens_2022011112_ne_24h_sfi_SFC_156.png

That aligns with early thoughts for this event...Albany through the Berks up to Dendrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Tossed

Entertaining run to click thru tho - it’s got that going for it. 
 

It’s doing all that with zero phasing because it’s kicking that southern stream out too far ahead… outpacing the northern stream, which is trying to come down into the backside

I have no idea how to correct for this particular model I don’t really pay much attention to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Entertaining run to click thru tho - it’s got that going for it. 
 

It’s doing all that with zero phasing because it’s kicking that southern stream out too far ahead… outpacing the northern stream, which is trying to come down into the backside

I have no idea how to correct for this particular model I don’t really pay much attention to it

I have no idea either and I corrected myself because the evolution is certainly doable. The clown map is misleading .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

I have no idea either and I corrected myself because the evolution is certainly doable. The clown map is misleading .

Jesus… Not that it’s worth it to analyze but that particular storm depth and track being from southern stream origin like that? If it did exactly like that there would be 20 to 30 inches of snow from White Plains New York to Nashua New Hampshire regardless of whatever that snow tot product shows.

If anything the model’s under done with QPF for one but two that’s basically historically powerful frontogen signature there - if that were ever kept track of

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Jesus… Not that it’s worth it to analyze but that particular storm depth and track being from southern stream origin like that? If it did exactly like that there would be 20 to 30 inches of snow from White Plains New York to Nashua New Hampshire regardless of whatever that snow tot product shows.

If anything the model’s under done with QPF for one but two that’s basically historically powerful photogenic signature there - if that were ever kept track of

Agree. It’s a pretty sweet mid level track. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Entertaining run to click thru tho - it’s got that going for it. 
 

It’s doing all that with zero phasing because it’s kicking that southern stream out too far ahead… outpacing the northern stream, which is trying to come down into the backside

I have no idea how to correct for this particular model I don’t really pay much attention to it

Model is abysmal...I'd rather gamble on the HR 84 NAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...