• Member Statistics

    15,757
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Chicago12
    Newest Member
    Chicago12
    Joined
WinterWxLuvr

Mid January/Mid February Medium/Long Range Discussion

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea...it’s one thing when we get totally shafted but as long as I get a warning level event obsessing over “who got more” seems silly. Just ruins what is a rare opportunity to be happy as a snow weenie. 

That mindset plagues the human race. lol. At every single step of your life there are people more successful than you, richer than you, luckier that you, etc. Appreciate what you have at all times because in the same vein there are always people less successful, less wealthy, unluckier, etc. 

  • Like 19
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Ji look at the h5 track. Base of the upper level trough goes across the TN/KY border through southern VA then closes off as it passes just under us. That’s the “Goldilocks” upper level look I was talking about yesterday and this morning.  This was close to the perfect run. Only thing that could have maxed it out more would be a little weaker NS system initially and stronger STJ wave to wrap up the coastal 6 hours sooner...then you get that 12-24” area down here...but that’s getting really picky and if you wrap the low up too early you get the rain solution again so it’s a thin margin for error with barely any cold in place. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a great look for sure. Temps are a bit iffy at the start verbatim. But it is way too early to be even thinking about that. I would also prefer the phase to happen a bit further south. At least for my area. But exciting run overall

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Euro is showing such a basic and easy setup that I can't imagine anything going wrong 

If the wires are routed properly it will snow, what could go wrong?

 

 

wires.png

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12z EPS is better than 0z but not really close to supporting the op. EPS supports a forum divider or all rain more than a flush hit along the piedmont. Still an improvement run over run and there is a cluster of I95 hits in the mix. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

12z EPS is better than 0z but not really close to supporting the op. EPS supports a forum divider or all rain more than a flush hit along the piedmont. Still an improvement run over run and there is a cluster of I95 hits in the mix. 

It was better than I expected at that range. 

Obvious improvement from 0z.  This isn’t the best way to illustrate it but it’s the easiest and I’m busy  

72 hour mean snowfall

0z

159F7510-B177-44F7-8C52-2D71CACB58F6.thumb.png.06c0810699052d922dd1dc8d32352d9c.png

12z

4554B192-BD1C-4948-AAD5-65C4C27A3E2C.thumb.png.d3571c3bff56b32e1794f0ee700e9519.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

12z EPS is better than 0z but not really close to supporting the op. EPS supports a forum divider or all rain more than a flush hit along the piedmont. Still an improvement run over run and there is a cluster of I95 hits in the mix. 

Ironically the GEFS moved away from this system. Still there but past runs were better. Euro op might be out to lunch, just a hunch, we've seen this a bunch....the gutpunch.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@psuhoffman Under the hood there are 10 out of 50 that hit the piedmont/I95 corridor. Some big hits and some lame ones. I expected more than 10 given that it's d8-10 now and not way out there. I wasn't expecting the majority to suddenly jump on the big hit parade but I was also expecting a bit more support than what it shows. An improvement is an improvement though so trend is friend and stuff. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

@psuhoffman Under the hood there are 10 out of 50 that hit the piedmont/I95 corridor. Some big hits and some lame ones. I expected more than 10 given that it's d8-10 now and not way out there. I wasn't expecting the majority to suddenly jump on the big hit parade but I was also expecting a bit more support than what it shows. An improvement is an improvement though so trend is friend and stuff. 

I guess I had lower expectations. There are flaws. Just because this one op run spit out the damn perfect set of permutations we need to make this work doesn’t make that suddenly likely imo. It just means it’s within the envelope of possible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, psuhoffman said:

I guess I had lower expectations. There are flaws. Just because this one op run spit out the damn perfect set of permutations we need to make this work doesn’t make that suddenly likely imo. It just means it’s within the envelope of possible. 

Given the general setup I would think there are mulitple ways for it to work out. Op was a unicorn. I think we can all agree there. Not seeing a number of 1-3/2-4 deals implies that this may be an all or none type of scenario. Crapload of time before it all starts really mattering. Would feel better if ens consolidate towards a more unified solution by the end of the weekend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ryanconway63 said:

what are folks using to view the Euro ensemble these days.   TT is very limited.

I think mostly weatherbell and pivotal weather

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Bob Chill I did see material improvement wrt the h5 setup though. 

Leading into it look at the 50/50 signal.  That 50/50 Hudson Bay ridge combo puts us in the game at least  

7B8158CE-3B8C-44DF-ABDD-4F6FEA1C1042.thumb.png.793fb3edfb8a22f5e6a59725a71a9025.png

There is enough to like here...

nice western ridge, that h5 track is classic.  The 50/50 departs a bit faster then ideal and I’d prefer the ridge centered by Hudson not east but it’s close enough to the +AO big storm composite look actually  

D56E8CF9-D874-4BEE-8AA6-4C6EB3B5174C.thumb.png.6c485ee1bfadd6b106a414b5a7818e67.png

Its a shame the airmass is atrocious. That’s why the results are lackluster. Every variable has to be spot on perfect to work. If we had a colder antecedent airmass I bet the ensembles would be lit up like a Christmas tree right now. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

Given the general setup I would think there are mulitple ways for it to work out. Op was a unicorn. I think we can all agree there. Not seeing a number of 1-3/2-4 deals implies that this may be an all or none type of scenario. Crapload of time before it all starts really mattering. Would feel better if ens consolidate towards a more unified solution by the end of the weekend. 

Right now at least, guidance is indicating there isn’t enough cold air for a marginal setup to work. Light precip will be rain. A questionable track will be rain. A perfect track but not amplified enough will be rain. The only snow scenario is a perfect track amplified storm that CCBs the living hell out of us such that dynamic cooling overcomes the thermal deficiencies. That’s why you’re seeing the mediocre ensemble results imo. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well add the eps to the “flip up top” camp. Again I don’t care what the day 15 details are. Seeing all guidance weakening the death grip the PV has up top is good news. 

46BAFCE7-4101-4E7B-AFA9-DAC6CC184AF9.thumb.png.d637341bc0889dbaaf0897cf9d71b661.png

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Well add the eps to the “flip up top” camp. Again I don’t care what the day 15 details are. Seeing all guidance weakening the death grip the PV has up top is good news. 

 

this should make judah cohen relevant again on twitter

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ji said:

jb probably already firing up the delayed but not denied standard line

Delayed but not denied is  mostly a cover up for a busted forecast. Timing is one of The Critical components of a forecast. Always two weeks away is a component of that which may after several months finally verify 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bob Chill said:

12z EPS is better than 0z but not really close to supporting the op. EPS supports a forum divider or all rain more than a flush hit along the piedmont. Still an improvement run over run and there is a cluster of I95 hits in the mix. 

WB EPS 12Z.  As Bob describes, while under 9 days, operation is not a lock solution yet but my fingers are crossed.

EB9B6247-448E-43AB-AB05-93B65857584A.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, psuhoffman said:

This is the only map we care about...

21C16CDF-020C-421F-8580-5A3FAFA1DC0F.thumb.png.92392d7d93d403e895d0866e485b079f.png

15” here...check please. 

we know this isn't correct. i get more than you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, mappy said:

we know this isn't correct. i get more than you. 

February 1958 had some similarities to the euro track and location of the phase and your area had more from that so it’s possible...;)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want the bob chill storm back...that was a slam dunk 3 to 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GFS sends it on a Gulf of Mexico tour and out to Bermuda...again I think
Yea
..it starts so well and ends so poor.

Like Marcus's weather boards
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

The potential upside is that with the GFS showing 5,468 s/w's, it's probably not going to be right with one of these storms.

Damn...we lost a couple of shortwaves from the last cycle.  Chances are decreased.  I'm out!! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.