Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

One last Cape Cod Crusher March 4-5


rnaude241

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 525
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Some models increase frontogenesis right along the area where S-SE winds at 700 are converging with impending W flow near eastern/SE areas. Might have to watch for a sneaky band to develop in that area? This is separate from any OES.

 

Soundings are very favorable for good snow growth so if any type of lift occurs, someone could get a sneaky inch or two. I think some OES spots could easily break advisory if we can get any type of banding to stay over an area for more than a couple hours.

 

The question is just whether we can saturate the lowest 3000 feet by getting some decent lift. That isothermal layer between -10 and 12C is pretty nice though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soundings are very favorable for good snow growth so if any type of lift occurs, someone could get a sneaky inch or two. I think some OES spots could easily break advisory if we can get any type of banding to stay over an area for more than a couple hours.

 

The question is just whether we can saturate the lowest 3000 feet by getting some decent lift. That isothermal layer between -10 and 12C is pretty nice though.

 

Yeah we'll see how it goes. Nrly drain will help dry the low levels..but like you said..the decent RH and lift near and within the snow growth zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...