Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,515
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    wigl5l6k
    Newest Member
    wigl5l6k
    Joined

January 2015 Pattern Discussion


CapturedNature

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The idea is that nobody should be mico-analyzing the 1/4 threat yet. There's an awful lot of uncertainty when you have no downstream blocking and a lot of energy ejecting out of the SW.

 

We have another 3 runs to get this threat inside 120 hours...and we know how much can change even at that lead time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's a whole different upper level look. The energy from that PV is not going near the ULL out of the SW so instead you get what you see on the 12z euro.

Experience in seeing these kinds of 5 h looks tells me that modeling is going to have issues with -25 degree air just to the North with a tight fast gradient . Does NOT mean I expect snow,only means we are going to continue to see huge model swings for probably the next 2-3 days. Gradients and ejection timing of energy in a cold regime have been and are a modeling dilemma. Exactly why I was chagrined at some pretty smart people's definitive cutter posts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea is that nobody should be mico-analyzing the 1/4 threat yet. There's an awful lot of uncertainty when you have no downstream blocking and a lot of energy ejecting out of the SW.

 

We have another 3 runs to get this threat inside 120 hours...and we know how much can change even at that lead time.

 

I think it's reasonable to say that the interior will at least have a wintry start given a decent antecedent airmass, even if it does cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's reasonable to say that the interior will at least have a wintry start given a decent antecedent airmass, even if it does cut.

 

 

Yeah that looks like a fairly decent bet. It's hard to start as striaght rain in January when the antecedent airmass is quite cold.

 

I'll start bothering to look at the position of the highs and such probably in another 2 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget the block north of AK too. That is an extremely important piece to the driver of cold in the lower 48. This is aside from any -EPO ridge.

I think snow goose is seeing it from the NYC south perspective? The pattern advertised on the euro looked good beyond d10 for us (sne) IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wild swings in the models continue. Para went from a mostly snow solution to a wet type look for most of SNE and central new england. Has what looks like two lows one after another.

Still a week out and it'll change a dozen more times

 

Yep...the past day of EURO runs are pretty funny.  Yesterday's 00z run had almost a HECS for the mid-Atlantic for the event on the 4th, then 12z went back to cutter...00z had a low cutting all the way over Lake Superior...and now 12z doesn't even smoke cirrus in NNE.  An average of the 4 runs would put a low tracking right along the SNE coast or even in-between ALB and HFD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep...the past day of EURO runs are pretty funny.  Yesterday's 00z run had almost a HECS for the mid-Atlantic for the event on the 4th, then 12z went back to cutter...00z had a low cutting all the way over Lake Superior...and now 12z doesn't even smoke cirrus in NNE.  An average of the 4 runs would put a low tracking right along the SNE coast or even in-between ALB and HFD.

I don't remember the HECS run other than snowing one around d10 but not the same system? Maybe I didn't look closely enough....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro is seeing the pattern breakdown I've been talking and several others about starting at Day 10...its likely a few days early on it but you can see the EPO ridge retrogading or possibly even collapsing.

Agree...we would be flooded with Pac air after the high slides off the coast...the ridge totally broke down..the ens keeps us cold with a -epo ridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ridge a little further east wouldn't be a bad thing. Probably a better position for us with less of a risk of cutters if it were to be true.  Again, I still don't see a woe is me pattern overall. Hopefully the wrist cutters posting yesterday can dial it back some.

 

Until people have snow in their yard, they will complain...then some of them will stop...but others will complain that the snow isn't 3 feet deep or that perhaps the models show a pattern relaxation 2 weeks down the road...some people are just chronic complainers.

 

 

Anyways, I agree that the pattern looks pretty decent going forward to the foreseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until people have snow in their yard, they will complain...then some of them will stop...but others will complain that the snow isn't 3 feet deep or that perhaps the models show a pattern relaxation 2 weeks down the road...some people are just chronic complainers.

 

 

Anyways, I agree that the pattern looks pretty decent going forward to the foreseeable future.

 

Definite potential - I agree. 

 

It's a decent pattern... not a great pattern. My gut tells me we cash in eventually but we don't have a ton of margin for error. Hopefully the weenies understand that if they're without snow 7 days from now it's not the models fault. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definite potential - I agree. 

 

It's a decent pattern... not a great pattern. My gut tells me we cash in eventually but we don't have a ton of margin for error. Hopefully the weenies understand that if they're without snow 7 days from now it's not the models fault. 

 

Yeah we really need a -NAO to call it a "great" pattern. I'm hoping one can form in the latter half of January like 2005 did, but it's not going to be easy.

 

But in the meantime, we've got a very good PAC pattern to give us chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but could you explain the difference between the two?   I don't understand how to separate one from the other. Thanks.

 

The EPO ridge itself is a huge ridge poking up into AK...the block north of AK can be part of the -EPO ridge...but the ridge can break down and leave the block behind north of AK. That pattern would still deliver cold into Canada even if the EPO ridge broke down because the block north of AK still promotes cross-polar flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but could you explain the difference between the two?   I don't understand how to separate one from the other. Thanks.

 

Here is an example. If you loop this, you can see that block pinched off north of AK. As a result, the cold has nowhere to go, but south. This was key last winter.

 

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=ecmwf&region=nhem&pkg=z500a&runtime=2014122812&fh=0&xpos=0&ypos=667

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...