OSUmetstud Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 what do you have Scott? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 what do you have Scott? 50 on the button..if I did the math right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRSno Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 lol at 24" on January 12th. I have no reason to lie or exaggerate my measurements. As far as I know this isn't a contest. Humor me as to why me reporting 24" on 1/12 is lol worthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 [quote name=((((d-_-)))' timestamp='1295647684' post='332316] I have no reason to lie or exaggerate my measurements. As far as I know this isn't a contest. Humor me as to why me reporting 24" on 1/12 is lol worthy. 62" in Winchester would beat everyone around you by at least 10". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 [quote name=((((d-_-)))' timestamp='1295649027' post='332464] So you're telling me there was no way I saw 24" from that storm? Guess I need to learn how to measure again. My apologies. I don't know what you saw in that storm. It prob was close to 20" at least anyways. I'm just saying your seasonal total so far sticks out, that's all. If there are others around that have as much..by all means point them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmanmitch Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 0.5" 11/8/10 (sleet from retrograding low) 9" 12/7/10 (upslope/lake effect) 1.5" 12/10/10 (clipper) 2.5" 12/1?/10 (post cold front snows after rainstorm) 16" 12/26-27/10 (Boxing Day storm) 3.5" 1/7-8/11 (Norlun) 20" 1/12/11 2.5" 1/18/11 (ice and snow) 2.5" 1/19/11 (wet snow) 4.5" 1/21/11 Total = 62.5" I'm probably missing a number of coating to 1" upslope/lake effect type events that are common in this area that I didn't bother to measure, so my seasonal total is likely several inches higher than the 62.5" I calculated. I'd put it somewhere between 65" and 70". Snowpack depth is 21". Seasonal average is between 75" and 80". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ski MRG Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 77.50" as of 1/21/11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 43.75 ave is 42 16 inch depth with lollis of 48 in snowblown areas LOL, true though, also have my secret stash off the deck in the shade preserving as long as I can, put all the slush in there from the other day, approaching 60 inches on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 50 on the button..if I did the math right. We're tied. Yea, I call BS on the Winchester total....that dude is wrong and there is no question about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Is anyone else finding it quite cumbersome to get measurments due to how high the bankings are.....I mean, if this event next week pans out, I'm going to need a trampoline or ladder; I'm not used to this. Highest reading in heavily shaded area- 24.5" Lowest reading in very exposted area- 17" I'm going with a 21" depth. The 8.5" from today has compacted to 7" of fluff on the surface, but the bottom 14" is bullet proof crust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherX Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 43.5" after the 4" of fresh today..... .5" shy of the seasonal total from last winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 I have about 46" now I asked this question in the Pattern thread, but no response so here it is: Is BDL's month-to-date total (43.0") accurate? If so, that puts them exactly 0.1" away from the snowiest January on record (Jan 1996 -- 43.1"), and 2.3" away from the snowiest month on record (Dec 1945 -- 45.3") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherX Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Absolutely John, one needs a weather station to measure snow, how is the one you use? Oh thats rights you use somebody elses!! As for measuring snow, I always wondered how you did it, since you actually have to get outside every 6 hours, something you dont do. I wondered how long it would take for you to personally attack me here, I am shocked it did not happen at 3 am when your drunk. The sad thing is, whether your sober or not, your still a bad person. Have a great day, I look forward to more of your personal attacks. So when you post a weather observation, you get it from where? BDR? Spend $40 and get a thermo, for God's sake and stop making stuff up. How is calling into question your observations a "personal attack"? The only personal attack here is your post. And how dare you call me a bad person, how dare you. I drove you and your **** stained truck home from the last GTG and made damn sure I did it safely and delivered you home to your family safely, which was way against my better judgment under the circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 I have about 46" now I asked this question in the Pattern thread, but no response so here it is: Is BDL's month-to-date total (43.0") accurate? If so, that puts them exactly 0.1" away from the snowiest January on record (Jan 1996 -- 43.1"), and 2.3" away from the snowiest month on record (Dec 1945 -- 45.3") There's heavy heavy controversy regarding BDL's measuring of a few events. Most agree that something fishy was going on. At any rate, Wiz was all over the fact that as it stands they are a couple of flakes away from setting a New. World. Record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 It's like a Socks and Skier pissing match redux in here. Take it to PM guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherX Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 It's like a Socks and Skier pissing match redux in here. Take it to PM guys. My fault. Sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collinsville Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Is BDL's month-to-date total (43.0") accurate? No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 There's heavy heavy controversy regarding BDL's measuring of a few events. Most agree that something fishy was going on. At any rate, Wiz was all over the fact that as it stands they are a couple of flakes away from setting a New. World. Record. thanks, must have missed it. I knew there was some contraversy over BDLs totals, so when I saw their numbers after today, I was curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sankaty Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 42". Snow depth 15-16". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 50.5" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 50.5" What is your depth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 What is your depth around 24" but i havent done a very detailed analysis...the bottom 18 or 19 is like a glacier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 around 24" but i havent done a very detailed analysis...the bottom 18 or 19 is like a glacier Yea, you have about a 3" lead because of the heavy rain attributed beat down that I received........my bottom glacier is only about 14". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpickett79 Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Is anyone else finding it quite cumbersome to get measurments due to how high the bankings are.....I mean, if this event next week pans out, I'm going to need a trampoline or ladder; I'm not used to this. Highest reading in heavily shaded area- 24.5" Lowest reading in very exposted area- 17" I'm going with a 21" depth. The 8.5" from today has compacted to 7" of fluff on the surface, but the bottom 14" is bullet proof crust. LOL..did you see my snowbank pics? You'd have to call the fire dept to use their ladder truck to get over them. Make sure you wear your leggins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tavwtby Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 with yesterdays 4" , I'm at 59" on the season. Visions of 95-96, when the snowpack stayed around until April. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpickett79 Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 LOL..did you see my snowbank pics? You'd have to call the fire dept to use their ladder truck to get over them. Make sure you wear your leggins we should keep an updated yearly map of SNE cumulative snowfall. so far this year it appears unusually uniform around the 50 mark.....with you a touch above and interior ct SW OF hartford even a notch above that...(waterbury,ct )....and the usual suspects on the E slope .....65-75. w amounts dropping off quickly Se of KTAN as well as along select screw zones in S. coastal ct and ditto RI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 42.0" here. Over at Wachusett, areas on the sides of the trails where it is not groomed allow a ski pole to go down down down... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 we should keep an updated yearly map of SNE cumulative snowfall. so far this year it appears unusually uniform around the 50 mark.....with you a touch above and interior ct SW OF hartford even a notch above that...(waterbury,ct )....and the usual suspects on the E slope .....65-75. w amounts dropping off quickly Se of KTAN as well as along select screw zones in S. coastal ct and ditto RI. The 8th wonder of the world..my snowbanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 The 8th wonder of the world..my snowbanks How are you going to "place" another 12"+ on top this week? No plateau to let it rest... Great effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.