Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,004
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

The Allsnow Blizzard of 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RU848789 said:

Thanks.  Ignore the point and click when they're at odds with the issued snowfall maps.  They'll update soon.  Also if you go in to the hourly weather graphic it shows 4.3" of snow for Perth Amboy.

Plotter.php?lat=40.517&lon=-74.276&wfo=PHI&zcode=NJZ012&gset=20&gdiff=10&unit=0&tinfo=EY5&ahour=36&pcmd=11011111111110000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000&lg=en&indu=1!1!1!&dd=&bw=&hrspan=48&pqpfhr=6&psnwhr=6

My original point got a bit lost. I was only showing what AW and the NWS were telling the public in their (measured/conservative) weather discussions in text/writing. 
The public does not know what we do about maps, etc.

You are right though; they seem to have a standard time forward where they will show inches in writing. Looks like about 60 hours.  For example, still no inches shown in writing for Sunday night for my area.

Ok we're good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, David-LI said:

ABC 7 going with 1-3" for the city , 3-6" eastern Long Island with their noon update.

Still measured/conservative amounts. I don't blame them, really.  They are broadcasting to a huge public audience, not to a forum.  They almost always leave room to increase amounts as they look more certain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did we all learn this week?
If the GFS is consistent run after run with minor waffling, you may want to listen. I doubted it 
I feel like that goes for really any of the major models. When one model is absolutely locked on to a solution with consistency you have to give it greater consideration.

Sent from my SM-F966U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, bluewave said:

My only issue with the OP GFS is that the low further east usually becomes the main low like the Canadian and other guidance is showing. 
 

IMG_5830.thumb.png.15fdf465d29df249478cea00eaee1d18.png
IMG_5829.thumb.png.6f3bfbed9b2e180e1bbe293288abc204.png


 

 

The issue is how the models are handling that initial piece of energy to hit the coastline, which is the energy that spawns that “eastern low”

The models have continuously trended towards this being more meridionally oriented, and thus more closely involved with the main s/w energy, with the GFS leading the way to this point in that regard

There won’t be an “eastern low” or a “western low”, at least for any extended time there’s going to be one low, and the question is how well the big chunk of energy can rein in that front running stuff

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Blizzard-on-GFS said:

A lot of you guys are going to owe the GFS a big apology after this storm wrecks us lol

Sent from my SM-F966U1 using Tapatalk
 

I prayed every night for the gfs to be right here.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brian5671 said:

I can't remember the last time I watched a TV local newscast.  The average age of a viewer must be like 60 these days...

I stopped watching them when I started following online forums going back to the AccuWeather/Eastern forums days in the early 2000s a few years before PDII. I always found the weather forums to be more accurate and informative than TV meterologists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kat5hurricane said:

I stopped watching them when I started following online forums going back to the AccuWeather/Eastern forums days in the early 2000s a few years before PDII. I always found the weather forums to be more accurate and informative than TV meterologists.

March 2001 was the watershed/gamechanger for lot of TV mets.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

I can't remember the last time I watched a TV local newscast.  The average age of a viewer must be like 60 these days...

i'm 63 and haven't watched in decades. 60 is young enough to have seen the rise of phones and social media.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although the 15z NBM shows highs of 38° on Sunday and 37° on Monday, I suspect that the temperature will be near or just below freezing during the height of the storm. The 38° high on Sunday will occur before the onset of the storm. The 37° high on Monday will likely occur late in the day after the snow has moved away. Based on the standard deviation band, a reading in the upper 20s cannot be ruled out. We'll have to see where things are in the soundings for ratios, but this doesn't look like a low snow-liquid ratio event.

image.thumb.png.4f34e6499880eb0b403c58f03c457570.png

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

TV is always going to be conservative this far out-by tomorrow different story

viewers do not like hearing snow. they want to hear no snow.....i have friends right now saying it won't snow, it can't snow...not because of facts, but because they do not want it to snow....and those are the ones who are willing to even say the word...i know people who won't even say it.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherpruf said:

viewers do not like hearing snow. they want to hear no snow.....i have friends right now saying it won't snow, it can't snow...not because of facts, but because they do not want it to snow....and those are the ones who are willing to even say the word...i know people who won't even say it.

They definitely don't especially the closer we get towards spring. We're the crazy ones 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
  • 100% 1
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although the 15z NBM shows highs of 38° on Sunday and 37° on Monday, I suspect that the temperature will be near or just below freezing during the height of the storm. The 38° high on Sunday will occur before the onset of the storm. The 37° high on Monday will likely occur late in the day after the snow has moved away. Based on the standard deviation band, a reading in the upper 20s cannot be ruled out. We'll have to see where things are in the soundings for ratios, but this doesn't look like a low snow-liquid ratio event.
image.thumb.png.4f34e6499880eb0b403c58f03c457570.png
Also the NBM is gonna be incorrect bc there's a lot of time lagging involved in that dataset. If you have a way to view the percentile MaxT data, the 10th or 25th will probably be more representative.

Sent from my SM-S936U using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...