Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,602
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    eloveday
    Newest Member
    eloveday
    Joined

Is we back? February discussion thread


mahk_webstah
 Share

Recommended Posts

At least there’s a lot of action to track. Very very active pattern coming up. Could be a lot of disappointment too when you’re playing with fire along the boundary but there’s always a few patterns where you need to ride the line if you want the goods. 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

At least there’s a lot of action to track. Very very active pattern coming up. Could be a lot of disappointment too when you’re playing with fire along the boundary but there’s always a few patterns where you need to ride the line if you want the goods. 

I'd rather take my chances near the Battle Zone then deal with the useless cold we've had

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UnitedWx said:

I'd rather take my chances near the Battle Zone then deal with the useless cold we've had

Yep. Stein over the last week-plus sucks. Especially once you get deeper into February. The sublimation/melting around the edges is pretty minimal when you are cold/dry in mid-January. But once you are in mid-February, even in a cold pattern, it really gets noticeable with those shards forming on snow banks and edges. Need to refresh that stuff.

  • Like 3
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MJO812 said:

Cmc also crushes SNE 

Different wave spacing/event mechanism -  when you say "also" it kinda sorta sounds like "same", whether you meant that or not.  So ... just sayn'   

It matters, because the CMC in fact has nothing from the same prospect that the GFS designed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 23/24 system could have some tepid support in a relative sense.   On whole, very negative PNA through the entire period, doesn't normally inspire wildly spun up and anchored coastals.  Certainly ... during a season where we've observed    0   productivity in coastals; persistence and trend begs to differ.  Ha.   However nested within, there is still a 2 to 3 day relative maxim in there.  It would not be altogether crazy to observe a system moving through at that time  Kind of with Ray on that... sub 980 mb lows tip-toeing around the coast line as though it were the work of some cryo-dystopian artist's white dream ...that's really is not what that signal is, however. 

It's 7+ days away still. There's time for the general circulation mode to alter enough - even idiosyncratically helps.  But the problem with a very negative PNA is that the W-E coordinate is the correction vector.  It's very heavily/statistically correlated.  So it's like yeah ... a system slips through the medium, but it's favored to be more middling in amplitude, moving fast along a more E trajectory.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Show me one with 4feet ORH Berks. Thanks in advance 

what was the range on those? also, didn't 15 or 17 have some insane clown maps that were showing like 60" in places, think it was only the nam tho, which tends to do that with every decent hit we get at least once 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dendrite said:

ineedsnow posted a 60” one in PA weeks ago. But I only save fantasy maps that crush me.

image.png

Ya there’s been a few this year, had that 40-80” run in the Ohio valley to SNE a month ago. Last year in mid Feb we had a lot of weenie runs when the ensembles were spitting out 20-30” means at 10:1 over the entire northeast 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...