dendrite Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, dryslot said: Slowly bumping up as tenth at a time, Getting close to 1.0" qpf, 0.87" This will be Feb 69 for us by late next week 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 This is going to be a great regional hit for many, Somethings that's been a miss for several years being this widespread. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 4 minutes ago, dendrite said: This will be Feb 69 for us by late next week Ha, That's possible, Could match the avatar, Even the 10:1's on the GFS are insane. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, dryslot said: Ha, That's possible, Could match the avatar. I was being sarcastic about how slowly this storm is ticking for us. But yeah…some could be balls deep in 10 days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 13 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said: It’s a SWFE, I don’t understand why there’s been hype wrt 18”+ totals? Sure, there might be some lollies on the coast, but for the interior folks it’s moving out too quickly to be anything historic. Should be pretty awesome and wintry for everybody so sit back and enjoy. It’s the SLRs really. Our SWFEs are often arctic sand IIRC. Pretty unusual to run 1-1.5’’ of liquid through high SLRs region-wide. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, dendrite said: I was being sarcastic about how slowly this storm is ticking for us. But yeah…some could be balls deep in 10 days. lol, Yeah, The SWFE last 48 hr rule, But you have to really like the look going forward into Feb. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxeyeNH Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, CoastalWx said: God, the hype is out of control. Scott, maybe but I watched ABC evening news. This is going to be a catastrophic storm. No one has ever seen anything like this! 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 You couldn’t ask for a better setup for the region given the last several years. Everyone wins in this setup. There really isn’t a screw zone. It’s a region wide dumping 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 For us it is a fairly ordinary storm. For those about to get the ice, that will suck big time. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 9 minutes ago, dendrite said: This will be Feb 69 for us by late next week I would take that month. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 26 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said: This has been a 10” to 14” storm for days. Well, your area never had any more upside than that, but some other spots do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, HoarfrostHubb said: For us it is a fairly ordinary storm. For those about to get the ice, that will suck big time. We all should’ve chipped into buy DIT a plane ticket to Greensboro NC. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, wxeyeNH said: Scott, maybe but I watched ABC evening news. This is going to be a catastrophic storm. No one has ever seen anything like this! I don't watch the news really so idk what they're saying, but this is probably going to be a legitimately high end to historic storm. Anyone getting .75-1" of ZR down in the south is going to have their grid collapse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 34 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said: A worthwhile read https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/hpcdiscussions.php?disc=qpfhsd Don, You are looking good at both locations for this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said: For us it is a fairly ordinary storm. For those about to get the ice, that will suck big time. A fairly ordinary storm? Down here, 10-16” has been around our seasonal total for like 3 of the last six years. This is phenomenal! 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said: Well, your area never had any more upside than that, but some other spots do. I mean, anything over 10 inches here will be gravy. Usually SWFE is 8”-10” max here. I’m guessing Greenfield will be 10” if it’s under that I might be disappointed but I’m fine with a decent warning event, no matter what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, WxWatcher007 said: I don't watch the news really so idk what they're saying, but this is probably going to be a legitimately high end to historic storm. Anyone getting .75-1" of ZR down in the south is going to have their grid collapse. I really feel bad for those folks, After living thru Icestorm 98 here and we are much more suitable to handle events, They're fukd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, dryslot said: Don, You are looking good at both locations for this one. Feeling good. It's nice to just watch a storm unfold without worrying too much. It's about damn time. This is going to be a big one for many, not just in New England. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 27 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said: It’s a SWFE, I don’t understand why there’s been hype wrt 18”+ totals? Sure, there might be some lollies on the coast, but for the interior folks it’s moving out too quickly to be anything historic. Should be pretty awesome and wintry for everybody so sit back and enjoy. Well, it's about as extreme of a SWFE as you'll get given the airmass combined with the potential for a coastal finish in Monday.....this is akin to someone saying on March 11, 1993 "It's progressive, I don't know how we are getting 2-4'". I'm not comparing the events, but the point is that this is not a climo SWFE..hell, 12-16-07 dropped over a foot and the airmass wasn't quite this cold, nor was there any redevelopment aside from a triple-point. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 I’m gonna be pissed if I don’t get 16” 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 7 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: You couldn’t ask for a better setup for the region given the last several years. Everyone wins in this setup. There really isn’t a screw zone. It’s a region wide dumping Weirdly it's not as much fun to follow. You always like to see somebody get screwed. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 8 minutes ago, dryslot said: lol, Yeah, The SWFE last 48 hr rule, But you have to really like the look going forward into Feb. 2011 2015 run incoming 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JACKASS Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, kdxken said: Weirdly it's not as much fun to follow. You always like to see somebody get screwed. da fuzz 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 8 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said: For us it is a fairly ordinary storm. For those about to get the ice, that will suck big time. 3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Well, it's about as extreme of a SWFE as you'll get given the airmass combined with the potential for a coastal finish in Monday.....this is akin to someone saying on March 11, 1993 "It's progressive, I don't know how we are getting 2-4'". I'm, not comparing the events, but the point is that this is not a climo SWFE..hell, 12-16-07 dropped over a foot and the airmass wasn't quite this cold, nor was there any redevelopment aside from a triple-point. Its not a SWFE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 7pm afd Quote KEY MESSAGE 3...A winter storm looks to bring a substantial accumulation of dry, powdery snowfall Sunday into Monday. Heavy snow with 1"+ inch per hour snow rates Sunday early evening to early Monday morning will make travel very difficult. Increasing easterly winds could produce areas of blowing snow, and near- blizzard conditions could develop in short intervals. A large winter storm impacting the Southern Plains, Mid-South and the Appalachians/Mid-Altc region tonight into Saturday remains poised to affect Southern New England Sunday, continuing into Monday before tapering off Monday evening. An anomalous amount of deep moisture falling into an antecedent frigid, Arctic airmass is likely to produce a substantial accumulation of dry, powdery snow for much of Southern New England. With the 700 mb trough positioned to our northwest into Upstate NY allowing for some intrusion of warmer air aloft from the mid- Atlantic/waters, the potential exists for sleet to still mix in along the immediate south coast and the Islands. Although that could cut into accumulations for those locations, it`s anticipated that warning-criteria snowfall should be met before that transition potentially happens and won`t significantly affect messaging. Weighing that, Winter Storm Warnings have now been posted for all of Southern New England, segmented out in such a way that Block Island, Martha`s Vineyard and Nantucket which have the best shot at periods of sleet with lower (7-10") accumulation, with all snow indicated for the large remainder of Southern New England, with snow totals in the 12" to 17" range. The potential exists for localized, isolated totals higher than that could develop pending placement of heavier snowbands, which is still uncertain at this day- 3 timeframe. Overall no major changes on the synoptic scale with some subtle wobbles in the storm track. Besides the still-credible potential for sleet to mix in along the immediate south coast/the Islands, there has been a few other changes to take note of. Period of heaviest snowfall still looks to develop Sunday early evening through early Monday morning, where the combination of strong frontogenetic forcing and heaviest liquid-equivalent QPF produces bands of heavy snow potentially with snow rates in the 1-2" per hour neighborhood. Travel is likely to be very difficult to nigh-impossible during this period of time. However as illustrated across several model outputs, it now looks like a dryslot aloft sapping RH in the snow growth layer races ENE across the southern roughly two-thirds of Southern New England Monday morning - the implication being that snow accumulations for Monday mid-morning to Monday afternoon could be lighter. Models are also now showing stronger ENE wind gusts in the 25-30 to 35-40 mph range Sunday night to early Monday with the strongest gusts over the Cape and Islands. That could open the door for areas of blowing snow to develop and this was indicated in the weather grids moreso along the immediate coastlines. Brief periods of near-blizzard conditions could be possible if stronger gusts materialize. The other uncertainty is the exact placement of mesoscale snowbands; we probably won`t have a solid grasp on where these localized bands may develop for another day or two, but one area which could be favored is just west of a modeled intense coastal front roughly along the I-495 to I-95 corridors. Further adjustments to the snow forecast could be possible pending the extent of sleet mixing in and the location/placement of heavier snowbands. Snow develops Sunday morning to early afternoon from SW to NE, becoming steady into Sunday afternoon. In most areas, snow will be falling with temperatures in the teens, which will favor a drier snow. As mentioned, the period of heaviest snowfall and most treacherous travel conditions looks to be from Sunday early evening to early Monday morning, with snow rates in the 1 to 2 inch per hour range possible. As sleet mixes in along the South Coast and the dryslot moves in aloft into Monday morning, we should then see lighter-accumulating snow for Monday/Monday afternoon before tapering off into Monday evening. Even though easterly winds are a little stronger, the risk for coastal flooding is minimal as astro tides are low. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Its not a SWFE The first portion is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 5 minutes ago, kdxken said: Weirdly it's not as much fun to follow. You always like to see somebody get screwed. Empathetically, I don’t want Ray to get screwed in storms, but he does have some fantastically dark prose when his backyard gets reamed. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 I smell death band. Sit back and smile. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Well, it's about as extreme of a SWFE as you'll get given the airmass combined with the potential for a coastal finish in Monday.....this is akin to someone saying on March 11, 1993 "It's progressive, I don't know how we are getting 2-4'". I'm not comparing the events, but the point is that this is not a climo SWFE..hell, 12-16-07 dropped over a foot and the airmass wasn't quite this cold, nor was there any redevelopment aside from a triple-point. Yeah, the biggest reason this is higher end despite being a SWFE is the airmass and amount of moisture involved. You try and rip that type of gulf moisture up over the top of an arctic airmass this cold, you're going to get fireworks....and it's also kind of an ideal angle with the broad trough...so the duration is decent for a SWFE....instead of like 6 hours and out, we're more like 10-12 hours before the upper midlevels start to dryslot. You can also throw in some local enhancers with this airmass like OES and a CF....the CF helped you in a system like 12/16/07 and it might help you again. So we could easily see widespread 10-16/12-18 from that. I think a lot of the 20"+ talk is overhyped at the moment, especially since Monday is looking less onshore flow if this ticks north....but there is still the chance someone could grab 20 if we trend that Monday position a bit further south and prolong onshore flow. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Look where the mid level low is before it tries to redvelop. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now