Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,486
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RHiggins
    Newest Member
    RHiggins
    Joined

First Legit Storm Potential of the Season Upon Us


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

Remember Ray’s maps from a few years ago with random arrows pointing here and there?     His have gotten much better. 
 

Sam’s were always the best though. Saggy. 

Lol .. those arrows going all different directions were something else . No one had any idea what they were showing (no offense Ray). That cracks me up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Just sitting here smiling . Would like to see 00z revert back to take everyone off edge. Going to watch some NFL playoffs and enjoy 

I think that's what'll happen. 

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

If I know how you roll you’ll go 3-6”

Good call. Just not enough confidence in widespread 4-8. Good luck out there tomorrow. 

I0FFrGO.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m actually liking my spot tomorrow. Far enough inland with a little elevation to avoid major temp issues, but far enough east to hopefully get some good bands even on an 18z scenario. 
 

I still think SE MA is going to rip for a while. Might have to wait until 00z for the real goods but they should arrive. I think the midday/PM stuff could be kind of banded/spotty…if it isn’t, that’s a positive sign. 

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I’m actually liking my spot tomorrow. Far enough inland with a little elevation to avoid major temp issues, but far enough east to hopefully get some good bands even on an 18z scenario. 
 

I still think SE MA is going to rip for a while. Might have to wait until 00z for the real goods but they should arrive. I think the midday/PM stuff could be kind of banded/spotty…if it isn’t, that’s a positive sign. 

Unfortunately I think you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wxsniss said:

Relax man, this feels a bit like amplifying a disagreement out of thin air... (a strength of this forum is the enrichment of ENTPs?)

Preponderance of legacy physics models Wed-Friday last week had Jan 18 a graze or completely out to sea vs. AI guidance almost invariably had a substantial advisory-warning hit across the southeast and more. The move of legacy models towards the AI guidance at 12z today suggested AI guidance could be correct, obviously with verification TBD.

You're reiterating the point I made multiple times: a major weakness of AI guidance is that how a solution is achieved is opaque, and we can't point to a physics-based mechanism for why they are consistent or change.

In any case, this field is at least something kind of evolving and cool to distract us from the latest of a series of disappointing winters.

I haven't looked at guidance since 12z, but my current take for Sunday: generally 2-4" eastern SN, spots 3-6" on south shore and Cape, 2-3" around Worcester area and less further west

Hoping at least for some Foxboro snow mojo of yore...

“Relax man“?

- you do succeed at one thing,  dissuading me from even wanting to read that thing 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

First 00z model with the improvements you want to see.. much better at 500. Should pound especially out east. Looks like my initial morning band is fading, but the evening snow looks healthy. 

Which one is this? I do think we need the morning as insurance against the precip shield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...