Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,663
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, TSSN+ said:

He’s probably right, but also is a weenie. His post for the last storm were unbearable. 

They’re all long shots.  That’s why they don’t happen often lol.  But that’s the fun of it!

 

27 minutes ago, Nomz said:

Here's AIFS verbatim. Probably add 50% to the totals to account for extremely good ratios.

image.thumb.png.10f37ef46195c0ae3e771fc6f0810b82.png

 

If you just look at the 144 panel of ai euro you’d be pumped. 
 

does anyone have the google ensemble for 12z?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, EHoffman said:

Apple Weather has over a foot of snow for DC next weekend lol

Based upon their performance this past weekend, my guess is that they're powered by AI or something. It's reading the QPF map and the temperature and saying "2 feet of snow!" without analyzing the midlevels, or it is analyzing the midlevels and coming up with something wildly wrong. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based upon their performance this past weekend, my guess is that they're powered by AI or something. It's reading the QPF map and the temperature and saying "2 feet of snow!" without analyzing the midlevels, or it is analyzing the midlevels and coming up with something wildly wrong. 

This is correct. Can’t tell ya how I know (some of you in here may know what I do for a living) What I can tell you is it’s something that’s being worked on.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayyy said:


This is correct. Can’t tell ya how I know (some of you in here may know what I do for a living) What I can tell you is it’s something that’s being worked on.

They could save money and processing power and just ask Bastardi how much snow.   Would probably actually be more conservative in totals.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

You're judging a global model based on an amoeba sized piece of real estate and discarding the entire storm. Everyone is entitled to an opinion but based on how the storm unfolded for the entire coast, the euro was BY FAR the best from mid range on in. It literally locked in during the short range and barely wavered.

Micro analyzing a global model is using the wrong tool and perspective. No one tool is the best and thats why forecasters are important. To make sense of all the different nuances across guidance. Personally, I stick to a blend of the euro for qpf, track, and progression and the mesos for the fine details like thermals and banding. The last storm went exactly as I expected based on that formula. 

Hey Bob!   Good to here from you.   I always admire your common sense knowledge.

You're guidance is well taken.        2 questions

It seems that the Euro deterministic has a difficult time differentiating between sleet and freezing rain. There was a large swath of significant freezing rain southwest/northeast across western Va.. I posted Sunday morning that I didn't buy this because 925 temperatures were too cold. In fact, freezing rain was minimal.  Thoughts?

Last, the AI ens. doubled the received amount of snow on December 8.  It nearly tripled the amount received for Augusta County last weekend.  Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayyy said:


This is correct. Can’t tell ya how I know (some of you in here may know what I do for a living) What I can tell you is it’s something that’s being worked on.

Apologize if this is stupid, but what's stopping them from just verbatim copying the GFS? AFAIK its public domain and, even if bad practice forecasting wise, would be leaps and bounds better than whatever they're doing right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologize if this is stupid, but what's stopping them from just verbatim copying the GFS? AFAIK its public domain and, even if bad practice forecasting wise, would be leaps and bounds better than whatever they're doing right now.

I think that’s what weather underground/WeatherBug do.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, anotherman said:

Apparently Google’s weather app is similar to Apple’s. A friend of mine just told me it says 30” for his town (Phoenixville).

Awful

Just looked at my phone, apparently I'm getting 12.46 inches of snow on Saturday. Good to know :arrowhead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple things are adding to the low predictability of this setup.

1. For every mile THE PV retrogrades west thats a mile it has to come back east. It ends up taking much longer for the troff axis to move through. The opposite is true if it retrogrades less.

2. Every bit of vorticity that consolidates with the western lobe also leaves less vorticity for the eastern lobe, we get weaker confluence plus a stronger troff. Opposite is true if it splits further east

Combine all this and we will probably be getting windshield wiper runs for a couple of days.

We don't usually get snow from setups where the 50/50 low is this far south, so its not gonna be easy to get a favorable track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologize if this is stupid, but what's stopping them from just verbatim copying the GFS? AFAIK its public domain and, even if bad practice forecasting wise, would be leaps and bounds better than whatever they're doing right now.

There’s nothing preventing them tbh. I submitted an internal app feedback form to our engineering team to fix that shit asap
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, IUsedToHateCold said:

Based upon their performance this past weekend, my guess is that they're powered by AI or something. It's reading the QPF map and the temperature and saying "2 feet of snow!" without analyzing the midlevels, or it is analyzing the midlevels and coming up with something wildly wrong. 

They showed that Cvill got 22 inches of snow during Sunday. They literally lie about the past and future. I assumed it was just some random model output combination but I'm convinced it just randomly picks the highest possible output and runs with it. Even then I have no idea how it got a short term forecast so wrong when any model had half its amount. Maybe we as a forum should write them an email? Genuinely someone should do something about this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

Adjust the AIFS exactly the same way and…well 

Completely different type of system, though. Although I do feel models tend not to model lows deep enough, which also results in models coming in too southwest. Only from svwx experience though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...