Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,359
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Sador0410
    Newest Member
    Sador0410
    Joined

Nov 28-30th Post Turkey Day Winter Storm


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, IWXwx said:

@Jackstraw :yikes:Euro is doin' its thing to us.

IMG_6442.png.0ab3e924fa6ab33407cdd9445bbad08c.png

A bit strange to see such a dramatic reversal - it's on an island at this point. Even the ensemble isn't quite so drastic with the cut off. 

If some of the hi res guidance suggested something like this I would start getting concerned, but after seeing the 12z GFS/HRRR, as well as the 15z RAP, I don't think this run was the start of an overall trend. Crossing fingers :ph34r:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fluoronium said:

I worry about mixing too. Winds will have a southerly component here for the whole event and the low tracks to our NW. Even in January, that gives a rainer almost every time. We should at least get a good hit near the start though. 

Yeah the early morning through mid to possibly late afternoon look good here. Probably several hours of solid rates. But I would be shocked with a low track that north if we dont mix or switchover at some point. But good thing is here looks to happen towards end of the event when most of our accumulation is done already. This system doesn't have much of a deformation zone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, WxMatt21 said:

A bit strange to see such a dramatic reversal - it's on an island at this point. Even the ensemble isn't quite so drastic with the cut off. 

If some of the hi res guidance suggested something like this I would start getting concerned, but after seeing the 12z GFS/HRRR, as well as the 15z RAP, I don't think this run was the start of an overall trend. Crossing fingers :ph34r:

Crossing my fingers too. I saw your call and if it is onto something, you might have to bring your totals down a little, especially to the south and I would that for you (and me lol). But at least you have warned the public about possible last minute changes since we are riding the edge. So far IWX and you are in pretty good agreement though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, IWXwx said:

Crossing my fingers too. I saw your call and if it is onto something, you might have to bring your totals down a little, especially to the south and I would that for you (and me lol). But at least you have warned the public about possible last minute changes since we are riding the edge. So far IWX and you are in pretty good agreement though.

Yeah, I noticed IWX has been pretty hesitant to use their NDFD output until recently! 

And wouldn't you know it, 12 ECMWF came in wetter/snowier, and in better alignment with the rest. Right now, I'm going to wait for the 18z NAM/HRRR to come in before making drastic changes, but my team is struggling with whether we want to keep things the same or up the totals since the consensus has been overwhelmingly snowy for most. My argument against is compaction, which could give off the impression we were dead wrong lol! 

Also, I'll be curious to know how well the NBM does when all is said and done. It has hardly budged over the past 48 hours

 

 

Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 12.41.39 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wild how nonchalantly we stumbled into maps like this. Like Alek mentioned, the decent antecedent conditions for once is cool and something I'd willingly accept in lieu of better ratios later on.
StormTotalSnow.jpg.b6c3353dd463681aa24251fac3c5ce1a.jpg

Every single member on the forum has been sleeping on this one
  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WxMatt21 said:

Yeah, I noticed IWX has been pretty hesitant to use their NDFD output until recently! 

And wouldn't you know it, 12 ECMWF came in wetter/snowier, and in better alignment with the rest. Right now, I'm going to wait for the 18z NAM/HRRR to come in before making drastic changes, but my team is struggling with whether we want to keep things the same or up the totals. My argument against is compaction, which could give off the impression we were dead wrong lol! 

Also, I'll be curious to know how well the NBM does when all is said and done. It has hardly budged over the past 48 hours

 

 

Screenshot 2025-11-28 at 12.41.39 PM.png

I'm glad to hear that the Euro decided to play ball. I wasn't aware of that concerning the NBM.

Screen-Shot-2020-10-31-at-6.51.31-PM-copy.jpg

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stevo6899 said:

Kinda annoying were starting the yr off with similar outcome around here lately with totals dissipating as the storm rolls east. Enjoy ia,il,in,west mich folks.

Gonna be interesting to see the variations in storm totals from west to east in the Detroit Metro.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SolidIcewx said:

Gonna be interesting to see the variations in storm totals from west to east in the Detroit Metro.

I don't think the negative lake influence will be as prevalence as some models show.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WSW up. I never dreamed November would produce another big dog this year after the 10" lake-effect event three weeks ago, but here it is. 

Some areas to my immediate northeast will have 18" on the ground thanks to last night's lake event.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Chicago Storm changed the title to Nov 28-30th Post Turkey Day Winter Storm
5 minutes ago, AWMT30 said:

Gonna be funny with SE Michigan with an advisory and Toledo under a Winter Storm Warning, 

Yeah, I normally don't disagree with DTX, but with the holiday travel and the face that the western part of their CWA is absolutely going to be warning criteria, I don't get the reluctance. I would do WSW for the entire CWA, it's borderline but the travel would be the tipping point to a warning

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Stebo said:

Yeah, I normally don't disagree with DTX, but with the holiday travel and the face that the western part of their CWA is absolutely going to be warning criteria, I don't get the reluctance. I would do WSW for the entire CWA, it's borderline but the travel would be the tipping point to a warning

 

If IND can pull their WSW all the way south to Indy, DTX can cover their CWA with a warning, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stebo said:

Yeah, I normally don't disagree with DTX, but with the holiday travel and the face that the western part of their CWA is absolutely going to be warning criteria, I don't get the reluctance. I would do WSW for the entire CWA, it's borderline but the travel would be the tipping point to a warning

 

Must be contagious. First it was GRR for several years, now DTX too. 
 

I agree with you 100%. Second busiest holiday travel day in conjunction with 5-8” of snow and 30+ mph winds… just issue the warning. For many it’s the difference between waiting a day or two and just hunkering down vs. in the ditch with a wrecked vehicle or worse. Who cares if the amount of snow doesn’t specifically meet “warning” criteria, it’s irrelevant when it comes to life & safety IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...