mitchnick Posted Friday at 05:54 PM Share Posted Friday at 05:54 PM 1 hour ago, psuhoffman said: The weighted analog mean produces the follow snowfall predictions BWI: 18.1" IAD: 18.3" DCA: 14" December and January average below normal temps. February much above normal. My current snowfall forecast is slightly above this but I simply added a small bump for the "we're due" index. We've been pretty unlucky lately, maybe we get one good hit and this is that rare nina that ends up slightly above normal snowfall. They do happen once in a while and we are due for one. But for what it's worth the composite mean beat my "gut" adjustments 3 of the last 4 years. So... My call BWI: 20" IAD: 23" DCA: 15" Those numbers bode well up here/you as well as in Mappy's neck of the woods, on north. Pattern you posted screams more traditional Niña results i.e. a 40N winter. Which "used to mean" we "could" still pull out an event or 2 even with February H5 looking like what you posted. We'll see. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osfan24 Posted Friday at 07:32 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:32 PM I’ll take January 1996 and call it a winter. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mappy Posted Friday at 08:09 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:09 PM 2 hours ago, mitchnick said: Those numbers bode well up here/you as well as in Mappy's neck of the woods, on north. Pattern you posted screams more traditional Niña results i.e. a 40N winter. Which "used to mean" we "could" still pull out an event or 2 even with February H5 looking like what you posted. We'll see. I’ll believe it when it happens. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted yesterday at 01:41 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:41 AM On 11/12/2025 at 2:39 PM, psuhoffman said: That’s my take also. Using one cherry picked location (where a single fluke storm hit) from one season to say “its snowing more to the south” is flawed methodology. If you pull back and use even a 10 year period or longer then it becomes apparent it is not in fact snowing more to our south. Or they fail to realize that the area to our south is a higher elevation when they point out West Virginia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago On 11/14/2025 at 11:53 AM, WxUSAF said: That February pattern looks like shit the blinds, but if Arctic air is entrenched to our NW, we can get some CAD events. Another way we scored some snow (and let me emphasize "SOME", we're talking 1-3 or 2-4 type events here usually) during that pattern was with a follow up wave timed up right behind a cold front. The cold to our NW can press east behind a lakes cutter but it's not going to last...but if you get a strung out boundary with multiple waves we can get clipped with one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now