Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,510
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

Hurricane Lee--Glorified Nor'Easter or Legit Tropical? Near Miss or Direct Hit?


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Don't disagree in general. 

The 'stress' of (shear+ EWR)/2   results in functional citizen that still has PTSD triggers.  LOL.

Anyway ... I have almost never seen a hurricane achieve the same wind max post a EWR, regardless of particular case stresses. They are almost always slightly to more obviously not as deep in the pressure well, while also slightly to more obviously weaker with wind fields.  But here is the interesting thing - they are not "weaker" cyclones.  By spreading their cyclostrophic energy over a broader area, post EWR, they actually have the same or even greater ISE.

There's a physical reason for that, which can be explained in relatively simple terminology.

The EWR is a way to spread the gradient out in all directions.  If a hurricane reaches a deep well in the atmosphere at a small to mid-sized t-cyclone, this can become too intensely unbalanced against the ambient atmospheric pressure surrounding the storm.  The centrifugal force that 'opens up the eye' is overwhelmed. 

But the ongoing storm's momentum/mechanics are conserved ... so a resolution to this problem is the EWR.  By widening the eye, no longer exceeds some critical ratio of surrounding pressure medium with respect to the core - and the circulation stabilizes at a larger size - lower wind velocity, around a larger circumference achieves the same ISE ( or even more) but is 'balanced' against the surrounding storm medium.

So it is a bit technical ... but I tried to tone it down.   

So, ...this is where your shear showed up. It sort of intervened at that critical vulnerable time.  The storm got larger, but the core disruption can't find the post EWR stable attributes because it's partially uncoupled within the total circulation manifold -  this part is a bit more suppositional. 

Doesn't mean Lee won't 'reconnect' and fall back in love... ( 115 is a better relationship than I've ever found!)  But it's moving slow.  I wonder what the thermocline is in that region and if it can whirl around at 110 mph forever without it up chucking colder water and choking in its own vomit.

Nailed it.

Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Really fascinating stuff here

OFCL=NHC
HFAI=HAFS-A
HFBI=HAFS-B
HWFI=HWRF
HMNI=HMON
CTCI=COAMPS-TC

 

It's actually more interesting that the climate based and official (NHC) aren't terribly better, either.

That's possibly telling as to this one's 'historic-based irrelevancy'  ... nice way of suggesting 'bias' in general.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

It's actually more interesting that the climate based and official (NHC) aren't terribly better, either.

That's possibly telling as to this one's 'historic-based irrelevancy'  ... nice way of suggesting 'bias' in general.

Yeah I thought the model performance as a whole was better than usual but the reality is more messy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

You can see wonky stuff with the op runs, but the ensembles are pretty split. EPS at 06z is even more west than they were before. At least in terms of western members. It’s an odd outlier. 

In my inexperienced opinion, it seems like much of the wonky stuff is tied into interaction with the front/trough progressing across the Northeast tomorrow. Too me at least, that accounts for alot of the wiggles back and forth on OP guidance. While both the NAM and GFS sort of weaken the trough and de-amplify a bit, there are some disagreements into how quickly this happens and the extent and that could play a big roll in how far west Lee will get. 

If we see see towards the western envelope, I think it's something into extreme western Nova Scotia or the eye just west of the actual land. I don't think we will see a final solution any more west than this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

You can see wonky stuff with the op runs, but the ensembles are pretty split. EPS at 06z is even more west than they were before. At least in terms of western members. It’s an odd outlier. 

The very active 0Z EPS still had only (4) 8% of members hit the US outside of ME. The 6Z EPS had 11 (22%)! That is by far the highest % with US landfalls outside of ME for any EPS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...