• Member Statistics

    16,544
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    BobbyB
    Newest Member
    BobbyB
    Joined
WxUSAF

January Storm Term Threat Discussions (Day 3 - Day 7)

Recommended Posts

2 mb stronger canadian high on the GFS, at 138. There also appears to be less PNA ridging, it's further west again as well but there's more confluence. We'll see what this run holds but it may be south.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

too weak... the wave was simply too weak and couldn't amplify at all.  Dampened as it came east.  We need a healthier wave to eject from that western trough then that.  Just the GFS but that run troubled me slightly more then the last few misses to the south because that was at least consistent with itself.  If the wave that ejects out west is that weak...it will go south.  The other runs were just doing stupid GFS stuff but the storm should have been further north.  This run did was it will do IF that wave is actually that weak.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, midatlanticweather said:

Ouch. This looks familiar 

snku_acc.us_ma.png

If we're going to fail might as well do it in the most epic way possible!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok let me clarify what I meant above before I start a panic....this run of the GFS does not bother me because its the GFS and its all over the place at this range.  But...the way it suppressed the storm on THIS run was a more realistic scenario.  What I saw on the last few runs didn't bother me at all because it was suppressing the storm for the wrong reasons.  So...as long as none of the other guidance trends to a weak pathetic flat wave ejecting out west tonight...we are fine.  But if we start to see across guidance a trend weaker with the upper level low coming across that is BAD because that is what is driving this storm.  There has to be an amplifying upper level low to our west to pump ridging for this scenario to work.   The trough axis is off the east coast and the flow is NW to SE...this isnt a type of setup where a surface low is going to amplify up the coast along the baroclinic boundary.  This only works if we have a strong upper level center to our west pumping heights into the confluence to our NE creating a strong inverted trough for a low to amplify along.  That won't work if the upper low is weak.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Cobalt said:

Canadian has our storm at least

gem_mslp_pcpn_frzn_eus_26.thumb.png.eb029c3faccbd8ff7635554148b7af88.png

thats not a storm

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ji said:

GGEM is weak POS..id rather have no storm

Haven’t you btched for a month straight about seeing “blue” over your house?  GGEM does it.  Stop being picky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, nj2va said:

Haven’t you btched for a month straight about seeing “blue” over your house?  GGEM does it.  Stop being picky.

thats not blue man...thats pathetic

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ji said:

GGEM is weak POS..id rather have no storm

it was better then last run lol.  But really want to go crazy...the TPV lobe that was supposed to slide across in front of the monday wave and help suppress the flow over top of that wave...and keep it from cutting...slowed down sooo much that not only did it allow that Monday wave to get out in front of it and drive north but its still around and compressing the flow over the top of the storm later in the week.  LOL  

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news WRT the TPV lobe is at the rate its slowing down EVERY run lately...its probably going to end up to the west of the next wave also and not be an issue.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

cutter suppressed cutter... it knows our climo 

Growing up in the SE, I never realized the MA had to work so hard to get its snow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like the GEFS doesn't agree all too much with the GFS. It's encouraging when the ensembles take a step in the right direction despite the operational taking a step back. Precip/snow maps still rolling out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cobalt said:

Seems like the GEFS doesn't agree all too much with the GFS. It's encouraging when the ensembles take a step in the right direction despite the operational taking a step back. Precip/snow maps still rolling out

the op probably just drank Jobu's rum  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Ok let me clarify what I meant above before I start a panic....this run of the GFS does not bother me because its the GFS and its all over the place at this range.  But...the way it suppressed the storm on THIS run was a more realistic scenario.  What I saw on the last few runs didn't bother me at all because it was suppressing the storm for the wrong reasons.  So...as long as none of the other guidance trends to a weak pathetic flat wave ejecting out west tonight...we are fine.  But if we start to see across guidance a trend weaker with the upper level low coming across that is BAD because that is what is driving this storm.  There has to be an amplifying upper level low to our west to pump ridging for this scenario to work.   The trough axis is off the east coast and the flow is NW to SE...this isnt a type of setup where a surface low is going to amplify up the coast along the baroclinic boundary.  This only works if we have a strong upper level center to our west pumping heights into the confluence to our NE creating a strong inverted trough for a low to amplify along.  That won't work if the upper low is weak.  

But I still don't get how this squares with the concern of us not being cold enough...How, in the disaster scenario you mentioned, would it be cold enough to snow down south?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

But I still don't get how this squares with the concern of us not being cold enough...How, in the disaster scenario you mentioned, would it be cold enough to snow down south?

Dynamically driven...its actually raining on the northern fringe of precip on WV while its snowing in SC on the gfs run...but with incredibly heavy precip and crashing heights under the mid and upper level lows it creates just enough cold to get snow.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, nj2va said:

@Avdave will like this run

I want tip rip it off now and sleep with it lol. 15" here.  By next Thursday this will in buffalo lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.