Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

AMZ8990
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Icy Hot said:

When did WSW criteria change? I thought it was 6" or more for our area? They are calling for 2-4??? This is straight from NOAA.GOV - A Winter Storm Warning indicates that heavy snow of at least 6 inches in 12 hours, or at least 8 inches in 24 hours, is expected. It can also be issued if sleet accumulation will be at least half an inch. 

Can differ from office to office on criteria...I know FFC is real low

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Math/Met said:

Looking at the soundings after the initial band moves through, the 3km NAM soundings are extremely impressive over NE TN on the lingering snow. Snow growth layer drops very low, so terrain induced lift extends into DGZ. Very steep lapse rates extend through the DGZ (SFC CAPE of over 50 in some areas). This all suggests potential convective snow bands and very high snow ratio on the lingering snow by 03z and beyond.  Probably 20:1 or better ratios after 03z with some of those snow bands. Those are always some of my favorite things to watch.

Yeah, that is pretty much an awesome post right there.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Blue Ridge said:

Santa came early...

Edit to add: Map hasn't yet updated. Looks like they upgraded watch to warning and SPS to WWA except the furthest SW counties (incl. Hamilton). 

Edit 2: To recap: WSW for 2-4", locally higher depending on elevation; WWA for 1-3"; SPS remains for minimal accumulations and hazardous travel.

Edit 3: Map just updated. 

image.png.214abeedaceaeea2c69bb3f3c05a4b63.png

1-3 here with WWA already is actually surprising from mrx 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could someone explain why it seems the Nashville wx office ( which is the one that issues for us in Cumberland county, not sure why we aren't under Morristown?) always is the last one to post any wsw/ or watches , and they are always a lot more cautious. They usually end up boosting the totals at the very last minute if ever, which makes them wrong alot IMBY . This time it's gone from getting maybe 3-4 down to an inch now .....ugh. I know it's hard to predict for the plateau, but sometimes I can get a better forecast from Morristown. I'm kinda new to posting but really learn a bunch from the other members, thanks! I'm about 10 mi NW of Crossville and several hundred feet higher in Cumberland county close to the Putnam county line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Def a fan of the RGEM for my area. Everything else is too little too late for most of MoCo:
giphy.gif&key=ebf6f4af89a28e4bfe1de96d0e1de567220a5b9acd1d4623319952d95c9c4538
 
Really interested to see if something like those convective bands verify under the lapse rates of the upper low. 
One of those bands would be awesome!!! 15:1 or 20:1 ratio with pouring snow... Just a dream to get one of those imby.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wintersnow888 said:

Could someone explain why it seems the Nashville wx office ( which is the one that issues for us in Cumberland county, not sure why we aren't under Morristown?) always is the last one to post any wsw/ or watches , and they are always a lot more cautious. They usually end up boosting the totals at the very last minute if ever, which makes them wrong alot IMBY . This time it's gone from getting maybe 3-4 down to an inch now .....ugh. I know it's hard to predict for the plateau, but sometimes I can get a better forecast from Morristown. I'm kinda new to posting but really learn a bunch from the other members, thanks! I'm about 10 mi NW of Crossville and several hundred feet higher in Cumberland county close to the Putnam county line

Nashville being in CST almost always is a little later than MRX with disco/storm products.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, John1122 said:

As a rule you can cut the 3k extreme totals by about 60-75 percent. I believe in the last event it showed LeConte with maybe 24 inches and I think they got 6 or 8.

Wow, LaConte only got 6-8"? Recorded over a foot on the Skyway here. But, yeah it's usually about 25-30% below what the 3k shows on the peak here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

In fact, could be some pretty intense snow shower activity at
times as lapse rates steepen up through the dendritic growth zone.
Temperatures by Christmas morning should dip into the teens.

Snow showers will taper
off into early Christmas morning; however, a secondary vorticity
lobe looks to swing through on Christmas Day, helping to reinforce
the clouds and some snow shower activity

JKL disco about the snow showers that follow the frontal precip Thursday night and Christmas day energy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TellicoWx said:

Wow, LaConte only got 6-8"? Recorded over a foot on the Skyway here. But, yeah it's usually about 25-30% below what the 3k shows on the peak here.

After looking at the next day's post on high on LeConte, they ended up with 11 inches. So slightly less than 50 percent of what the 3k was showing. It really keys on higher terrain and just dumps snow on those spots for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess with the front now bisecting Arkansas approaching the Mississippi River this really is going to rapidly move into nowcast obs mode. We going to continue on this thread or someone opening an obs thread?

 

Edit to add: speaking of which 20 degree difference between southern AR and NW AR.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I know..it's the HRRR in la la land (end of it's run)..but something interesting. As the center of the trough passes by, there is an enhancement of snow over the valley. Something to watch for on the other short range modeling. With the way everything is modeled, and such a vigorous trough (evident by the numerous banding features on all short range models), while the wrap around low moisture is almost locked in, I think there is a "potential" to bust high across the valley back to middle TN on the forcing from the trough itself (wringing out all available moisture/ terrain enhancement for the plateau adding even more lift/ and the high snow ratios shown)....but could be wishful thinking too lol

Screenshot_20201223-164801_Chrome.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I know..it's the HRRR in la la land (end of it's run)..but something interesting. As the center of the trough passes by, there is an enhancement of snow over the valley. Something to watch for on the other short range modeling. With the way everything is modeled, and such a vigorous trough (evident by the numerous banding features on all short range models), while the wrap around low moisture is almost locked in, I think there is a "potential" to bust high across the valley back to middle TN on the forcing from the trough itself (wringing out all available moisture/ terrain enhancement for the plateau adding even more lift/ and the high snow ratios shown)....but could be wishful thinking too lol

Screenshot_20201223-164801_Chrome.thumb.jpg.1aa5cdcdda1f4610368e0437eb394902.jpg

I am of agreement. I think this has high potential to bust higher for central and southern valley, plateau and highland rim.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TellicoWx said:

I know, I know..it's the HRRR in la la land (end of it's run)..but something interesting. As the center of the trough passes by, there is an enhancement of snow over the valley. Something to watch for on the other short range modeling. With the way everything is modeled, and such a vigorous trough (evident by the numerous banding features on all short range models), while the wrap around low moisture is almost locked in, I think there is a "potential" to bust high across the valley back to middle TN on the forcing from the trough itself (wringing out all available moisture/ terrain enhancement for the plateau adding even more lift/ and the high snow ratios shown)....but could be wishful thinking too lol

Screenshot_20201223-164801_Chrome.jpg

I’ve had the same thoughts, as vigorous as the front and overall NW flow, I think we Squeeze everything out

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RGEM is capturing the likely secondary snow better than the GFS/NAM/Euro. The HRRR is capturing it too. The RGEM has been consistent for two days that snow will linger. These major league Arctic airmasses are able to squeeze everything out, the snow growth zone -15c temps get low in the atmosphere and create the snow that falls that doesn't even show up on the radar because it's falling from so low in the atmosphere. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always like it when the airmass is so cold, you can see it in IR satellite during the day:

giphy.gif

 

 

Grays that look like clouds sliding through SE OK, but there are no clouds, just cold:

 

giphy.gif

Front is popping some convection now too, over central AR:

giphy.gif

 

and speaking of lapse rate snow showers, they look pretty healthy in the upper left of that gif, over KS

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RGEM is capturing the likely secondary snow better than the GFS/NAM/Euro. The HRRR is capturing it too. The RGEM has been consistent for two days that snow will linger. These major league Arctic airmasses are able to squeeze everything out, the snow growth zone -15c temps get low in the atmosphere and create the snow that falls that doesn't even show up on the radar because it's falling from so low in the atmosphere. 
I trust that aspect of the RGEM as it really dealt well with the trailing energy with the last event also. The NAM had snow out of my area while it was still snowing the RGEM nailed it.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always like it when the airmass is so cold, you can see it in IR satellite during the day:
giphy.gif&key=fb5e4b2992eed51b488925a47422b4253f988c74181253865c273afc915040cb
 
 
Grays that look like clouds sliding through SE OK, but there are no clouds, just cold:
 
giphy.gif&key=d5e807bb27f1c95cf4e85c694de728ce73f3e9675c9e93f93db53dc906cd4aea
Front is popping some convection now too, over central AR:
giphy.gif&key=69e80aafa60177370bfcef18a8c076865d5bc51c8ec74afacdba52db60ed1dfd
 
and speaking of lapse rate snow showers, they look pretty healthy in the upper left of that gif, over KS
 

Not sure if this system will fit the definition of a “Blue Norther” for those folks in Texas/Oklahoma but it is certainly dropping due south.

You can really see the orientation of the trough well in those animations.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think here just east of Nashville that we’ll see any anafrontal changeover.  I’m more interested in the energy coming in behind it on Christmas Eve into Christmas morning.  If we get anything, I’d say that’s where it comes from.  Considering how cold it will be, it won’t take much to at least whiten the ground if we can get under a decent band.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mr Bob unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...