Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Fear and loathing April, 2020 discussion, obs, and the occasional derailment


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Still need to watch late next week.

Might have multiple shots at something. That trough is ridiculous. EPS is 3 sigma trough over the lakes at 144 hours...that’s hard to get on an ensemble mean at day 6. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Wpc has a big cutter into the lakes early week.  Does that trend east or does that feed Blau king for late week?

Nah the cutter precedes the trough...we prob have a couple shots in the d6-10 range though. Extremely anomalous. We’ll see if the look moderates or not. 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ineedsnow said:

Paul might get his high risk in the south.. 45 percent hatched day 3.. 

High risk is possible but I still think there are a few things that could negate a high risk...or negate a very significant event from unfolding. It's rather difficult to really portray what I'm trying to say b/c I think a significant event does unfold but I guess it's do we see numerous tornadoes with several long-tracked tornadoes or is it predominately a damaging wind event with several tornadoes? Obviously a large scale widespread damaging wind event can still result in a high risk verification and I think that is possible here. 

But two things that stand out to me are;

1) Weakening EML

2) Perhaps widespread convective debris

3) Not so favorable llvl lapse rates 

But given the forcing aloft, dynamics, and degree of moisture return a significant and long persisting squall line is quite likely...maybe derecho like. But the lack of an EML may prevent discrete supercells from being the overall game mode...perhaps many initial supercells but congealing into multiple lines. Could be war of updrafts  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

I don't need the hand from the sky to take a dump on my newly sprouting peas and spinach.

Biggest danger might be to early blooming fruit trees...esp in SNE though parts of CNE may have had some early action on those trees. There are going to be some really hard freezes if that airmass is anything close to progged. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Biggest danger might be to early blooming fruit trees...esp in SNE though parts of CNE may have had some early action on those trees. There are going to be some really hard freezes if that airmass is anything close to progged. 

no greeen showing yet on my peach trees.  I really don't want that kind of freeze - climo says it backs off.  The hope is thatthere is enought wind at night, which has saved us before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

High risk is possible but I still think there are a few things that could negate a high risk...or negate a very significant event from unfolding. It's rather difficult to really portray what I'm trying to say b/c I think a significant event does unfold but I guess it's do we see numerous tornadoes with several long-tracked tornadoes or is it predominately a damaging wind event with several tornadoes? Obviously a large scale widespread damaging wind event can still result in a high risk verification and I think that is possible here. 

But two things that stand out to me are;

1) Weakening EML

2) Perhaps widespread convective debris

3) Not so favorable llvl lapse rates 

But given the forcing aloft, dynamics, and degree of moisture return a significant and long persisting squall line is quite likely...maybe derecho like. But the lack of an EML may prevent discrete supercells from being the overall game mode...perhaps many initial supercells but congealing into multiple lines. Could be war of updrafts  

if this goes signifcant damaging wind event with several embedded tornadoes do you think it could be an even more volatile setup for that than 1/10-1/11?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, crossbowftw3 said:

if this goes signifcant damaging wind event with several embedded tornadoes do you think it could be an even more volatile setup for that than 1/10-1/11?

That's a great question. I don't think this will be any more volatile than that event but could be similar in magnitude, but displaced a bit farther west. Although one thing to keep in mind too is foliage...much more foliage now than January and that could produce more in the way of tree damage. I really don't think the full extent of the tornado potential will be known until late Saturday night or early Sunday morning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...