Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

January 18th Event


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Yup, still bleeding. Actually euro and gfs both have the shortwave slightly weaker relative to 0z at least, but the damn ridge keeps growing each run. Not sure why exactly. I think the slower forward progress is part of that. 

Also..looking at the last 48 hours of runs...good and bad, the actual strength and position of the shortwave is irrelevant to the results here.  With the better runs were solely the beneficiary of a lead wave of WAA precip associated with strong mid level winds directed into the CAD in the mid Atlantic.  But as the ridge continues to strengthen, sharpening the trough...there will be no wave and the WAA with the main system will be directed well to our NW.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strengthening Atlantic ridge + sharper trough = not gonna happen on this one.

On a brighter note, we have a pattern change upon us once this crappy system clears through.

Ridge building out west and shortwaves diving through the southern states for at least next 5-7 days after this weekend. I’ve thought for last two weeks that come end of January and beginning February we start to see real chances. I think it’s coming down the pipeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

 

If this keeps up those with chase plans might want to look into Quebec City

A chase would have been nice, but my expectations going back a week or so was that we would be back in the game for the last week or so of the month. That still looks good. If this works out, it is a bonus given it is literally occurring at the initial stages of a significant pattern change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said:

I think all the solutions from 0.5” for DC to 8” have been shown in last 12 hours so cover all bases parameter requirement has been fulfilled. 

and without NWP there would have been absolutely NO FREAKING IDEA that there was even a remote chance at any frozen precip Saturday beyond simply taking a WAG.  So yes at day 5/6 there is a HUGE spread...but that spread is between a little bit of non consequential snow/ice to rain and a decent thump snow to dryslot.  As we get closer the guidance will narrow the possibilities until we get within 48 hours and they typically show a realistic range.  But the bottom line is the NWP can outperform humans with no help from guidance at EVERY RANGE.  Yea the range and accuracy isn't perfect at day 5 but before NWP humans didn't even attempt to forecast details  that far out because it was impossible.  You do not grade NWP on a realistic scale.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

We are run by run heading toward a showery cold frontal passage. Still time but this trend has to turn

I am always cautious when we see long range guidance spit out a lot of snow from a cutter.  It does happen.  And we remember those times it did.  But in reality for every one of those there are way more that just end up being a mostly rain event.  This one has a pretty good antecedent air-mass so it still might end up better then the majority...but the specter of big snows from these west track lows is a lot more of a longshot than we make it sometimes.  Every few years one of them ejects a lead wave that directs a strong mid level wave into the CAD and we get a nice thump snow...and then we think there is a good chance of that every time a cutter comes along with cold air in front of it.  What guidance is moving towards now is the more typical outcome.  I am not saying there is no chance it doesn't trend back towards a nice lead wave...but odds always were and continue to be against it.  We probably would be in a much better place mentally had the guidance not teased us for 24 hours with the rare snowy outcome from this type of thing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

I am always cautious when we see long range guidance spit out a lot of snow from a cutter.  It does happen.  And we remember those times it did.  But in reality for every one of those there are way more that just end up being a mostly rain event.  This one has a pretty good antecedent air-mass so it still might end up better then the majority...but the specter of big snows from these west track lows is a lot more of a longshot than we make it sometimes.  Every few years one of them ejects a lead wave that directs a strong mid level wave into the CAD and we get a nice thump snow...and then we think there is a good chance of that every time a cutter comes along with cold air in front of it.  What guidance is moving towards now is the more typical outcome.  I am not saying there is no chance it doesn't trend back towards a nice lead wave...but odds always were and continue to be against it.  We probably would be in a much better place mentally had the guidance not teased us for 24 hours with the rare snowy outcome from this type of thing.  

it didnt spit out that much snow lol...nobody was thinking more than 2-4....but we wanted 2-4---thats a blizzard  this year.  I dont think 2-4 into a big Fat CAD high was too much to ask for with temps in the 20s....i mean its not like we lost a Winter storm warning  snow event but in  this winter...losing  2-4 hurts. even losing  2 hurts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ji said:

it didnt spit out that much snow lol...nobody was thinking more than 2-4....but we wanted 2-4---thats a blizzard  this year.  I dont think 2-4 into a big Fat CAD high was too much to ask for with temps in the 20s....i mean its not like we lost a Winter storm warning  snow event but in  this winter...losing  2-4 hurts. even losing  2 hurts

2-4 is a LOT from a storm cutting over Chicago in the middle of an uber ridge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

Unfortunately it's pretty common until inside of 72 hours. The vast majority of our events are figured out until inside of 3 days. 

True.  And since the vast majority of Day 5 threats are likely to fail (just averages/climo), threads started at Day 5 usually don’t work out.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

2-4 is a LOT from a storm cutting over Chicago in the middle of an uber ridge.  

LOL it is and always was. We don’t get snow from lows in Iowa. The only real chance was to get it to trend south. This isn’t a cutter. This is a Midwest storm lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...