Ginx snewx Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 About as uniform a storm we ever get Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoth Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 21 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Yeah just over 25 here for the year. Zero complaints. Another year with another biggie. Jesus. Glad to push off regression depression for another year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 4 hours ago, wxeyeNH said: Just spoke to Alex in Bretton Woods and told him he has to update his snow totals. He has been really busy but finally did. 79"! Between snow and cold he definitely seems to have the weenie spot for board members! They wanted a snowy, cold place when they picked their location and moved north from Boston last year. They got it! It’s definitely a great weenie spot, although retention is not great as you know... but I’m happy. It’s a great combination of snowy climate, cool in the summer, easy to get to Boston from, but most importantly, the scenery just never gets old. I think at the end that’s probably the thing that mattered the most in moving here - it’s just a beautiful place... with lots of snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Trout is such a weenie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 58 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: About as uniform a storm we ever get I was thinking the same thing. Very strange how uniform the snowfall was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, CT Rain said: I was thinking the same thing. Very strange how uniform the snowfall was. Some cashed in on the WAA and some on the banding good stuff when BID and MTK cash in as well as most Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TalcottWx Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 On 1/5/2018 at 2:23 AM, 25thamendmentfan said: Genuine kudos. All too frequently on this site people are taking unpopular positions, getting hammered for it, and then ultimately proven right. What account did you originally have and were banned on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Ginx snewx said: About as uniform a storm we ever get We were in a dryslot for a while in southwest CT, but I think the winds evened it out nicely. Good example of a deathband that did not produce a stripe of higher totals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 The 700 low went like slightly SE of ACK. That prevented any dryslot issues for anyone. The 500 stuff was able to get decently west. I think that helped to give a really large area higher totals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I guess my total of 10.5” seems low, surrounding areas came in higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC-CT Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 14 hours ago, SJonesWX said: Poor james Don't worry, he's getting 4" of ocean effect snow today! 13 hours ago, Ginx snewx said: About as uniform a storm we ever get They should have thrown out that Marlborough report. I believe it was from early in the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
25thamendmentfan Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 On 1/6/2018 at 10:38 PM, sbos_wx said: What account did you originally have and were banned on? Are you confusing me with someone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 On 1/6/2018 at 10:04 PM, alex said: It’s definitely a great weenie spot, although retention is not great as you know... but I’m happy. It’s a great combination of snowy climate, cool in the summer, easy to get to Boston from, but most importantly, the scenery just never gets old. I think at the end that’s probably the thing that mattered the most in moving here - it’s just a beautiful place... with lots of snow. If you don't mind me asking why is snow retention a problem up there? downsloping? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 Snowfall totals for CT. A general 8-14" fell across the state with a few towns lower/higher. Only accumulation map i did for verif. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 13 hours ago, psuhoffman said: If you don't mind me asking why is snow retention a problem up there? downsloping? I'd guess it's "poor" for retention only as related to total snowfall. I've had less than half the snowfall but would guess that my current 20" depth isn't much less than his. But my CAD-king location is very good for retention. As with JSpin, high ratios (thus settling/sublimation has greater effect) may be one part of the reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted January 11, 2018 Share Posted January 11, 2018 OPC did a quick review of the bomb cyclone event, and found a phenomenon called dynamic fetch led to the 50+ waves observed during the storm. We know that fetch is the distance winds can travel over water. Dynamic fetch is when the wind max follows the wind direction, parallels the storm, AND moves at roughly the same speed as the wave period. Essentially it creates waves on top of the waves it already created. This is more or less what happened with the sting jet, moving along around 30 knots forward speed with ~18 second wave periods. What tends to happen is these waves then arrive as a wave front, increasing rapidly over a short period of time. At 44137 seas jumped from 28 feet to 56 feet in 6 hours! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 12, 2018 Author Share Posted January 12, 2018 Can anyone find/post the radar loop from start to finish for this? Would love to see a representation of the CF pegged just to my E for the 1st 1/2 of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 5 hours ago, OceanStWx said: OPC did a quick review of the bomb cyclone event, and found a phenomenon called dynamic fetch led to the 50+ waves observed during the storm. We know that fetch is the distance winds can travel over water. Dynamic fetch is when the wind max follows the wind direction, parallels the storm, AND moves at roughly the same speed as the wave period. Essentially it creates waves on top of the waves it already created. This is more or less what happened with the sting jet, moving along around 30 knots forward speed with ~18 second wave periods. What tends to happen is these waves then arrive as a wave front, increasing rapidly over a short period of time. At 44137 seas jumped from 28 feet to 56 feet in 6 hours! Sounds like storm surge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 6 hours ago, OceanStWx said: OPC did a quick review of the bomb cyclone event, and found a phenomenon called dynamic fetch led to the 50+ waves observed during the storm. We know that fetch is the distance winds can travel over water. Dynamic fetch is when the wind max follows the wind direction, parallels the storm, AND moves at roughly the same speed as the wave period. Essentially it creates waves on top of the waves it already created. This is more or less what happened with the sting jet, moving along around 30 knots forward speed with ~18 second wave periods. What tends to happen is these waves then arrive as a wave front, increasing rapidly over a short period of time. At 44137 seas jumped from 28 feet to 56 feet in 6 hours! Sandyesque for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Baroclinic Zone said: Can anyone find/post the radar loop from start to finish for this? Would love to see a representation of the CF pegged just to my E for the 1st 1/2 of this. Bobarino https://weather.us/radar-us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 12, 2018 Author Share Posted January 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Bobarino https://weather.us/radar-us Nice. This is the best radar representation of ra/sn I’ve ever seen. Likely never to be repeated again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 12 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: Nice. This is the best radar representation of ra/sn I’ve ever seen. Likely never to be repeated again. Wow. How steep was the snowfall gradient to your east? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 12, 2018 Author Share Posted January 12, 2018 1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Wow. How steep was the snowfall gradient to your east? It rained for a good 3 hrs longer 1-2mi to my E. I posted during the storm about this. Never have I seen a gradient like this anywhere around here. It puked snow here and never tainted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 12, 2018 Share Posted January 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said: It rained for a good 3 hrs longer 1-2mi to my E. I posted during the storm about this. Never have I seen a gradient like this anywhere around here. It puked snow here and never tainted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.