Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Feb 1/2 Obs


nj2va

Recommended Posts

Still like the looks of this system regardless of what the models are saying. Strong anticyclone to the north of the system should prevent the cutter that models are showing. With cold dry air in place the system will struggle to get too far north. With the overrunning that is likely to occur I see some advection fog being an issue and with the dynamics of the cyclone I could see some anvil crawlers occurring as well so look for some flashes of lightning.

 

Look for WWA's to be posted soon and likely updraded to WSW's soon after that. They are just slow to pull the trigger after what happened last week. The models will have this storm coming south later tonight. Don't give up yet guys.

that's the way mike masco is thinking too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The vort responsible for the storm comes in from Vancouver and barely gets below our latitude. Slp is forming barely south of our latitude in the Midwest. Expecting a near due east trajectory isn't going to work out.

When we had good runs yesterday, slp was popping in LA and AR. We've gone backwards quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We bust with all abandon. You would think the worst case scenario was a front end dump. Well be lucky now to see precip

We bust with suddenness. We transition to juicy rainstorms minutes after Arctic air masses run away. Somehow we manage to quickly go isothermal at 33 or 34 with heavy rain. In a winter where we have seen only brief mild periods, we still  manage to fail regularly. The only way we haven't failed is by suppression...yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We bust with suddenness. We transition to juicy rainstorms minutes after Arctic air masses run away. Somehow we manage to quickly go isothermal at 33 or 34 with heavy rain. In a winter where we have seen only brief mild periods, we still  manage to fail regularly. The only way we haven't failed is by suppression...yet

November if I recall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he was this morning, then i turned him off, too much garbage with the video!!

JB2 - "I like to follow trends and find the errors. If I am on to something, then the latest push north will end up with a result farther south. This is not wish-casting for snow, but spotting the errors. That is what happened on Sunday night with the last clipper and the impact of colder air with Thursday expanding those advisories south yesterday. "

 

Thats some really interesting analysis.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JB2 - "I like to follow trends and find the errors. If I am on to something, then the latest push north will end up with a result farther south. This is not wish-casting for snow, but spotting the errors. That is what happened on Sunday night with the last clipper and the impact of colder air with Thursday expanding those advisories south yesterday. "

Thats some really interesting analysis.

its going to go south.... Because it came north? Oooookay....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JB2 - "I like to follow trends and find the errors. If I am on to something, then the latest push north will end up with a result farther south. This is not wish-casting for snow, but spotting the errors. That is what happened on Sunday night with the last clipper and the impact of colder air with Thursday expanding those advisories south yesterday. "

 

Thats some really interesting analysis.  

Models are not allowed to continue a trend continuously in the same direction after x # of runs. If he's right...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vort responsible for the storm comes in from Vancouver and barely gets below our latitude. Slp is forming barely south of our latitude in the Midwest. Expecting a near due east trajectory isn't going to work out.

When we had good runs yesterday, slp was popping in LA and AR. We've gone backwards quite a bit.

That's the problem. If that low formed in the lower Mississippi valley and moved to west va, we would get a good front thump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the problem. If that low formed in the lower Mississippi valley and moved to west va, we would get a good front thump.

 

Yep. This one is done. The only thing that I could see save us is if the the vort is A LOT weaker then is modeled. But then we only get a couple of inches regardless. This is not gonna be a thumper though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...