Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    CHSVol
    Newest Member
    CHSVol
    Joined

Dec 9-10 storm threat


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That and how quickly the lower level cold gets taken over as well.  Apparently the models nailed this one with warmth...

 

Models severely under-estimated the low level cold for this event...which is often the case.

 

The mid-level warmth can go both ways IMHO. Usually when it busts cold, there's big time omega and you typically want to see a little upstream ridging mini-block...this event didn't really have that. So while the low level cold was very impressive...the 850-900mb level didn't have enough resistance...despite some good low level damming.

 

I had speculated yesterday that the warm layer being so low could be affected by the cold dome...but by about 03z-06z last night, it appeared that even better CAD than modeled still wasn't denying that 900mb layer...which has resulted in some of the most inverted soundings I've seen in quite some time. Uusually you will not see a sounding this inverted that low to the ground..its usually more up around 925-950mb:

 

141209151001.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where's my 5-inch front end thump???!!!!!  DIT was right on this one, he called for rain all the way up to Montreal days ago and that appears quite likely to happen. 

 

 

Who told you that you were getting a 5 inch thump in Westminster? :lol:

 

You must have not read much in here. It was possible it could bust positive that direction there, but that was definitely not the most likely scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that is inverted, look at GYX. I honestly didn't expect to see the 950 layer just succumb, but retreating highs FTL. As feared. Low level cold did hang tough. So you see how this complicated things. Retreating high makes you think CAD will weaken, but enough of an ageostrophic flow existed so that the lower 1500' was going to be colder than models had. Models were right to warm the 950-900 layer...but sometimes that isn't the case with such strong ageostrophic flow. In this case, the ageo flow was more pronounced in the lower levels...just not enough HP in a spot near Maine to keep the flow more E-NE at 950 and lock in colder air. However, it's cold enough at 850 to sustain snow. Go figure. What I could see happening from the Lakes Region to interior Maine is perhaps a flip to paste when the good lift finally gets here. It's a race to offset the warming, but the GYX sounding isn't a torch. It will warm, but this may be an interesting battle.

 

post-33-0-61534300-1418138190_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that is inverted, look at GYX. I honestly didn't expect to see the 950 layer just succumb, but retreating highs FTL. As feared. Low level cold did hang tough. So you see how this complicated things. Retreating high makes you think CAD will weaken, but enough of an ageostrophic flow existed so that the lower 1500' was going to be colder than models had. Models were right to warm the 950-900 layer...but sometimes that isn't the case with such strong ageostrophic flow. In this case, the ageo flow was more pronounced in the lower levels...just not enough HP in a spot near Maine to keep the flow more E-NE at 950 and lock in colder air. However, it's cold enough at 850 to sustain snow. Go figure. What I could see happening from the Lakes Region to interior Maine is perhaps a flip to paste when the good lift finally gets here. It's a race to offset the warming, but the GYX sounding isn't a torch. It will warm, but this ay be an interesting battle.

 

Wow, yeah, thats even more ridiculous.

 

If that high had held on maybe another 6-12 hours, then we would have seen the damming stronger through 950mb is my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like Scott said, this is lower level junk with crappy nucleation. When the big mid level lift comes in NNE should flip to snow before the mid level 0C pushes through.

 

Good to see Plymouth snow. I hope that happens there. Banking on cloud physics and laws of thermodynamics to help me out..lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who told you that you were getting a 5 inch thump in Westminster? :lol:

 

You must have not read much in here. It was possible it could bust positive that direction there, but that was definitely not the most likely scenario.

True True, I just feel the general consensus was that we'd at least get a net gain in snow on the season, when most of us in fact didn't even get a flake.  Tough situation to forecast though when dealing the tenths of a degree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's out here that the bust is really big if we don't get any snow.  My forecast was 8-14 inches . LOL.   But it was always gonna be the sharpest of gradients.

 

 

 

True True, I just feel the general consensus was that we'd at least get a net gain in snow on the season, when most of us in fact didn't even get a flake.  Tough situation to forecast though when dealing the tenths of a degree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First call: 48 hours Monday 00Z through Wed 00Z

BDL: 1

TOLLAND 1.5

CEF 2

BAF 2

ORH Airport 4.5

HUBBARDSTON 5.5

GREENFIELD'380' 6.5

SHELBURNE 9.5

PiTTSFIELD 9.5

SAVOY 14

I'm not familiar enough with eastern mass to make a call out there. Could be a thin glaze of glaze/ IP on top of the snow as well and I would probably bring down the high temperatures about 2-4 degrees on Tuesday from what Taunton is putting out but they are the experts. Tuesday morning commute impacts possibly NW of 84 and especially north of the Pike. Im going with a bit more of a thump than some of the modeling with the cold air in place at the onset. Bust potential with sightly warmer or colder profiles.

have to take accountability here this was a horrible call. Thankfully I did not put anything else on Facebook or mention this to anyone else. I did mention the bust potential with slightly warmer or colder profiles but still an absolutely horrible job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have to take accountability here this was a horrible call. Thankfully I did not put anything else on Facebook or mention this to anyone else. I did mention the bust potential with slightly warmer or colder profiles but still an absolutely horrible job

Nobody had a good call, so don't sweat it. This storm has been impossible to forecast.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who told you that you were getting a 5 inch thump in Westminster? :lol:

 

You must have not read much in here. It was possible it could bust positive that direction there, but that was definitely not the most likely scenario.

I'll take this over Dec 1996 every time...though the weather here on the cp is frightful, at least the hill tops aren't anymore delightful....let it rain,  let it rain, let it rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...