free_man Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 There was a Storm report for winds estimated 60mph up right near there. /threadcrashing Interesting. I didn't see anything nearly that strong but I was one step ahead of the storm the whole way. That was a nasty cell before it weakened near CON/MHT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Thanks! Did you notice any limbs down? If you did do you know the streets? I didn't notice any large limbs down. plenty of branches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted July 18, 2012 Author Share Posted July 18, 2012 I didn't notice any large limbs down. plenty of branches. Alright, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 SPECI KMHT 180038Z 00000KT 10SM FEW055 SCT080 SCT110 27/19 A2965 RMK AO2 PK WND 36052/0014 TSE37RAB17E26 OCNL LTGICCG DSNT E CB DSNT E-SE MOV SE P0000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Roger Smith's derecho forming NW of Rochester now near and over the lake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 SPECI KMHT 180038Z 00000KT 10SM FEW055 SCT080 SCT110 27/19 A2965 RMK AO2 PK WND 36052/0014 TSE37RAB17E26 OCNL LTGICCG DSNT E CB DSNT E-SE MOV SE P0000 60 mph, Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Wow at MHT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Was that warned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Was that warned? Going to depend where the ASOS is sited. It is the weird situation where MHT is a TAF site for BOX yet the slight majority of the airport is in Rockingham County (GYX). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Going to depend where the ASOS is sited. It is the weird situation where MHT is a TAF site for BOX yet the slight majority of the airport is in Rockingham County (GYX). I was on my phone and didn't look. I saw radar and it didn't look like anything special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 incoming but weakening steadily. a little lightning to the west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NoPoles Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Biggest momon on the site. I think tomorrow will be interesting. We stave off dry air, we rip. Could be "the day" of 2012 for this area. out of 7000+ people i should get a cookie or something...however, if tomorrow is "the day", well we still have a lot of 2012 left to go...gonna be long year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Going to depend where the ASOS is sited. It is the weird situation where MHT is a TAF site for BOX yet the slight majority of the airport is in Rockingham County (GYX). From what I was observing from Goffstown NH (the next town over to the west), and later on the radar, the storm looked to weaken steadily. My guess, it was the core collapsing that caused severe wind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 I was on my phone and didn't look. I saw radar and it didn't look like anything special. Even up this way the radar was very underwhelming and still had some 30-35 mph gusts in Portland. It barely even rained here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 From what I was observing from Goffstown NH (the next town over to the west), and later on the radar, the storm looked to weaken steadily. My guess, it was the core collapsing that caused severe wind. Low level lapse rates were actually pretty good in southern NH too, definitely a supportive environment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Low level lapse rates were actually pretty good in southern NH too, definitely a supportive environment. Yeah, that makes sense. 10-15 mi NW of MHT, the strongest winds were with the rain/hail falling and not any early gust front. It was pretty wild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Wow that's similar to the winds that BTV saw with that storm a week or two ago when they were sustained at 43mph and gusting to 64mph. Impressive... I love with the ASOS take direct hits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 Looks like there were some trees down in the Lakes Region and down towards Brian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 SREFs are much better looking tomorrow all around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisM Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 I really hope tomorrow performs. Could be one of if not our last big shot for the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 NAM keeps the best instability tomorrow on the south coast... with best shear along and north of the Pike. A bit out of phase. Bottom line - looks like a lot of storms - probably many severe ones. I doubt widespread damage or sig svr though attm. Things would have to be in better phase to get more excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 A lot of left moves today on radar. One in ME right now. Must be due to some of strong unidirectional shear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 NAM keeps the best instability tomorrow on the south coast... with best shear along and north of the Pike. A bit out of phase. Bottom line - looks like a lot of storms - probably many severe ones. I doubt widespread damage or sig svr though attm. Things would have to be in better phase to get more excited. I'm just happy if it rains..lol. Wind would be nice, but I'll take a good storm. Hopefully I can salvage one. I feel like CT/RI and TAN/PYM on south could do fairly well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 A lot of left moves today on radar. One in ME right now. Must be due to some of strong unidirectional shear. Yeah the one near CYUL was neat to watch. Long and straight hodos FTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrisrotary12 Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 It looks like I will miss out on the fun from these two days. Northern New England is getting all the fun today, while tomorrow looks to be mainly south of the Mass Pike as that is where the best instability is. O well, you win some you lose some. Big Winter incoming!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HM Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 SREFs are much better looking tomorrow all around. The probabilities for exceeding 20K Craven-Brooks SIG SVR are excellent in southern New England, PA, NY and NJ. Too bad we couldn't get some better wind shear (same old story). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 The probabilities for exceeding 20K Craven-Brooks SIG SVR are excellent in southern New England, PA, NY and NJ. Too bad we couldn't get some better wind shear (same old story). Yeah that's pretty good for sure. For once I have the day off and timing looks good in the aftn, so hoping to see something. I'm interested to see how these clouds hang around in the morning, but I think the lack of height falls and gradual backing of winds to more W-WSW will help keeping it further north and hopefully dissolve with time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 I wonder what wxwiz would do if you guys ever got an outlook like this up here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NECT Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 I wonder what wxwiz would do if you guys ever got an outlook like this up here... We've had a couple events that, in hindsight, would have warranted that sort of outlook. It's just so hard to call up here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyhb Posted July 18, 2012 Share Posted July 18, 2012 We've had a couple events that, in hindsight, would have warranted that sort of outlook. It's just so hard to call up here. I meant a setup that would very obviously warrant such an outlook (particularly in the synoptic sense, but also from a meso/micro scale point of view as well). The 6/1/11 setup, IMO, was a 10%, sig-hatched tor-warranted setup, the storm coverage (particularly concerning discrete, long-lived supercells) was just not enough to warrant anything further (same with 6/9/53 in all likelihood). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.