Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,044
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    Damisa
    Newest Member
    Damisa
    Joined

Hoisting the Sultan Signal: Heavy Rain Event July 5-7


WxWatcher007
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

It’s been dumping that heavy , soaking small droplet rain all day. Has not stopped. . I ran in it this morning and it just keeps building overhead. The stuff adds up. No one could have seen or forecast that . It’s probably similar to the soaking upslope rains you get all the time. I’m not exactly sure, but I’d bet there’s some small scale upslope component to this stuff today 

Analog 850 inflow is very wet for you. Some knew

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ginx snewx said:

Kev over an inch today me .22 he didn't knew 

 

1 hour ago, dendrite said:

image.png

 

1 hour ago, Ginx snewx said:

You earn it salesman 

 

1 hour ago, ineedsnow said:

 

 

Some knew.. you will have 3 by the time this is done.. congrats

All of you were forecasting regional flooding and a few had 4-6” of rain for the area . None of those things happened. So sure there was more rain than I thought, but nothing like what you called for at various points the last  few days . Let’s look in the mirror and own up.

  • Confused 1
  • Crap 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

 

 

 

All of you were forecasting regional flooding and a few had 4-6” of rain for the area . None of those things happened. So sure there was more rain than I thought, but nothing like what you called for at various points the last  few days . Let’s look in the mirror and own up.

The amount of hype going around on this was insane. This was going to be nothing more but a much needed soaking rain for many...that is it. All these posts about models showing widespread 4-8" of rain, which by the way were showing jackpots across northwest CT and north when the axis of highest rains which much farther south which was mentioned of likely occurring. All this talk everywhere about flooding rains and blah blah. Steady soaking rain with a widespread 1-3" and of course some 3-6" amounts south where the axis ended up being....and of course spread out over a long duration. I mean were there even any flash flood warnings lol (maybe 1?).

One of the most overhyped rain events ever. Nothing more than a soaking rain but I guess since how everyone thinks we're a desert now 3-4" is alarming 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

The amount of hype going around on this was insane. This was going to be nothing more but a much needed soaking rain for many...that is it. All these posts about models showing widespread 4-8" of rain, which by the way were showing jackpots across northwest CT and north when the axis of highest rains which much farther south which was mentioned of likely occurring. All this talk everywhere about flooding rains and blah blah. Steady soaking rain with a widespread 1-3" and of course some 3-6" amounts south where the axis ended up being....and of course spread out over a long duration. I mean were there even any flash flood warnings lol (maybe 1?).

One of the most overhyped rain events ever. Nothing more than a soaking rain but I guess since how everyone thinks we're a desert now 3-4" is alarming 

Ryan was concerned that some areas were in for flooding too…so what can you do? Modeling was throwing those ideas around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mm... to be fair, not sure how much of a "bust" this is...

It rained spot 8" totals ivo of slow moving convection around the mid and upper M/A - which by nature of what that is, yeah, it's very localized ... granted.  But doing so in a general 2-4" coverage from Delware to SE NH is reasonable.    

What busts in my mind is the amplitude in the models - to some degree, that was the case this time, just like we've seen so many times in the past since these models got updated, circa 2015, and have been consistently biased about ever since.   96 to 200+ hour range tends to "end the world" far more frequently than the pedestrian aspect that actually takes place.  Some normalization is all but dependable.

Again.. a filtration that still ... fails to modulate impressions of guidance by humans.   This is what leads to the 2nd form of bust...   (these are two concurrent busts moving past one another).   Humans than exaggerating... exaggeration is not ever likely to end well for verification.

Removing the wanton human goober factor, and accounting for the known model amp bias... it rained within reason. 

Someone else mentioned something that I liked the other day... Maybe it was Scott or Vortex95 ?  but raining 6" is impressive no matter what, but it's different animal entirely when that occurs in 2 hours rather than 2 days.

Basically ...it rained a decent amount over a large multi-regional aspect.  Perspectives will never land on objective reality.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Ryan was concerned that some areas were in for flooding too…so what can you do? Modeling was throwing those ideas around. 

Concern for some localized flash flooding, sure. But some of what was going around made it seem like flooding was going to be a large or widespread issue. But this is becoming a big problem in forecasting when it comes to some of these products. Folks see ensembles going crazy and all of a sudden alarm bells are sounded without fully divulging into all the data and then you have these products like extreme forecast index which further adds to the alarm bells. Yes, sure when you have these products showing something extreme there definitely should be concern, but they can't just be taken at face value nor should they be. Same goes with severe weather and winter weather...even in the west, a ton of events will get all hyped up with talk of tornado outbreaks and strong tornadoes because supercell composite parameter/significant tornado parameter forecasts are "through the roof" then the event comes and there are barely any tornadoes, let alone strong ones. And of course winter...D12 snowmaps show widespread 20-30" storms and here goes the social media hype for a massive blizzard. 

While sure there were guidance throwing around widespread 4-8" rain amounts and isolated higher totals, it was pretty clear that was not going to be the case and any amounts that excessive would most likely be extremely isolated or confined closer to where the warm front would be and it was also clear these totals would be spread out over a longer duration. Overall flood risk appeared low. 

Like I said earlier, watch in a few weeks we will get a setup with produces flooding and there will be little talk of the potential. For whatever reason it seems anytime talk of flooding is possible it never pans out, then we get setups where there is little mention of flooding possibility and you have problems all over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Ryan was concerned that some areas were in for flooding too…so what can you do? Modeling was throwing those ideas around. 

I don't think any reasonable forecaster was too far out there? I mean my forecast was a general 2-4" in CT with high end localized flash flooding potential, mitigated by the duration of rain and relatively dry conditions beforehand. Also said the axis of heaviest if it set up over CT could produce 6+ somewhere. All the numbers pretty much verified but there was very little flash flooding. 

I didn't see others saying 1954 was walking through the door but then again I don't really follow what others say. It's totally possible to write and communicate a good forecast without ripping and reading model output verbatim. Everyone serious knew the big rain signal over the region was going to end up focused in much smaller areas. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think earlier on the worry was about those situations I talk about, you get the mesolow with a rotating 50+ DBZ, tropical air over an area and you’re gonna get 3 to 4 inches of rain per hour or more causing flash flooding. Some of the models were hinting at that. That seemed to be a little bit more to the south as we got to game time but couple days out that was a potential.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

The amount of hype going around on this was insane. This was going to be nothing more but a much needed soaking rain for many...that is it. All these posts about models showing widespread 4-8" of rain, which by the way were showing jackpots across northwest CT and north when the axis of highest rains which much farther south which was mentioned of likely occurring. All this talk everywhere about flooding rains and blah blah. Steady soaking rain with a widespread 1-3" and of course some 3-6" amounts south where the axis ended up being....and of course spread out over a long duration. I mean were there even any flash flood warnings lol (maybe 1?).

One of the most overhyped rain events ever. Nothing more than a soaking rain but I guess since how everyone thinks we're a desert now 3-4" is alarming 

Better than the dimwits who called it over yesterday because the radar lightened up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said:

 

 

 

All of you were forecasting regional flooding and a few had 4-6” of rain for the area . None of those things happened. So sure there was more rain than I thought, but nothing like what you called for at various points the last  few days . Let’s look in the mirror and own up.

Spin spin.. you were wrong.. own it :flood::raining::thumbsup:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...