jbenedet Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago This looks like a signiicant icing event south of pike with potential all the way down to 95. Needless to say, glad I’m largely missing this one to the north… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Isothermal sounding on this NAM over Logan. NE wind 30mph pushing S/S+ rates is nasty cake at 32 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said: Isothermal sounding on this NAM over Logan. NE wind 30mph pushing S/S+ rates is nasty cake at 32 Let’s get a March 24, 1993 mini blue bomb at Logan (over 8” of pure spackle on a weak but juicy system running into a Quebec high with marginal antecedent airmass) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbenedet Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago I mean this is a very classic ice storm look for SNE, south of pike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, jbenedet said: I mean this is a very classic ice storm look for SNE, south of pike. Let’s ice it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said: Let’s get a March 24, 1993 mini blue bomb at Logan (over 8” of pure spackle on a weak but juicy system running into a Quebec high with marginal antecedent airmass) I remember talking to Scott 4 or 5 days ago, this thing had a minimum/floor of moderate impact back then and it was kind of believable just synoptically because the feature’s playing into it were stable/predictable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxsniss Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 6z Friday on NAM: Station: KBOS Latitude: 42.37 Longitude: -71.02 Elevation: 37.36 Press Height Temp Dewpt Dir Spd SFC 1024.1 37 0.1 -0.4 51 13 M 1000.0 227 -1.0 -1.4 57 27 S 950.0 636 -2.9 -3.4 83 33 S 900.0 1066 -1.2 -1.6 96 25 M 850.0 1523 -0.0 -0.3 119 20 S 800.0 2008 -0.7 -1.0 139 20 S 750.0 2524 -1.1 -1.4 181 16 M 700.0 3073 -2.6 -3.1 219 22 S 650.0 3658 -5.1 -5.9 234 28 S 600.0 4284 -8.2 -9.2 243 35 S 550.0 4955 -11.7 -13.1 248 45 M 500.0 5679 -16.0 -17.8 251 54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wx2fish Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Rgem is still on the warmer side, but heck of juicy run 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 20 minutes ago, jbenedet said: I mean this is a very classic ice storm look for SNE, south of pike. Yeah we're hoping for all ice with plenty of accretion 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Gotta replace my shovel dammit. Just hoping ice stays away or doesn’t otherwise impact life. NAM was a crazy run! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2026/03/rough-commute-on-tap-friday-am.html First & Final Call: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Kind of 12/23-24/2017 look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2026/03/rough-commute-on-tap-friday-am.html First & Final Call: You don't think someone sees 6-12? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, Torch Tiger said: You don't think someone sees 6-12? 12"? No. Maybe like 4-8".... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago I could def. see 4-8"...agree my map is conservative, but I just don't trust the higher QPF output yet....maybe tomorrow night I patch 4-8" over the 3-6". 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I could def. see 4-8"...agree my map is conservative, but I just don't trust the higher QPF output yet....maybe tomorrow night I path 4-8" over the 3-6". 8-10? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago all salemen/ladies asleep 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I could def. see 4-8"...agree my map is conservative, but I just don't trust the higher QPF output yet....maybe tomorrow night I path 4-8" over the 3-6". I haven't looked at this closely at all but from what ive seen it doesn't seem conservative at all to me, if anything its bullish on the snow. I dont see this producing any accumulating snow south of 90 Not saying this NWS map is right or what id go with, just compared to what little ive looked at this and whats out there its on the higher end snowfall wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 4 Seasons Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, Torch Tiger said: 8-10? you want snow all of a sudden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diggiebot Posted 13 minutes ago Share Posted 13 minutes ago Ice ice baby. Maybe a morning surprise for some people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now