Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,984
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    Damisa
    Newest Member
    Damisa
    Joined

2026 Mid-Atlantic Severe Storm General Discussion


Kmlwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

This was the strongest and most damaging storm that I have ever witnessed in my area in Pasadena. At least 10 times worse than the derecho. Over 2 dozen trees knocked down on homes and cars in my neighborhood and another community. I saw at least 5 homes marked unsafe for entry by county inspections. I haven't ventured further down Fort Smallwood where there is even more destruction. 

540200541_Screenshot_20260719-2013012.thumb.jpg.12f97e244e85f1f3c3244ef07c35b800.jpg1272910962_Screenshot_20260719-2013152.thumb.jpg.002a0b4d9b8e419e77ea69e8ecd3351c.jpg673531435_Screenshot_20260719-2013202.thumb.jpg.e7a27d24ac71e65d7767a0b3e7a1141f.jpg1336176534_Screenshot_20260719-2013052.thumb.jpg.ac5e5845020c94c1997809bdef39677e.jpg1099490313_Screenshot_20260719-2012572.thumb.jpg.be192b9b55c31aada791d27d3877e210.jpg1644868219_Screenshot_20260719-2012422.thumb.jpg.bc13e330b845b73be30f2a3b0844b063.jpg1858862988_Screenshot_20260719-2012472.thumb.jpg.0ef8e260f0ac50bb701f8bd60f7d4eb8.jpg

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/projects/ncar_ensemble/ainwp/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3_KcoSRHWhY1lxCTCfOqSNC0AD8SUSmL_c7R_N8rtpvo-PsNNvuY3vuI4_aem_Stpgx3ntIqB8IVErFY76cQ

Not posting individual maps since there are many toggles from the NCAR page - but NCAR highlighted areas would argue for continuing to shift the ENH eastward if it is correct. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/projects/ncar_ensemble/ainwp/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3_KcoSRHWhY1lxCTCfOqSNC0AD8SUSmL_c7R_N8rtpvo-PsNNvuY3vuI4_aem_Stpgx3ntIqB8IVErFY76cQ

Not posting individual maps since there are many toggles from the NCAR page - but NCAR highlighted areas would argue for continuing to shift the ENH eastward if it is correct. 

There has been a clear trend in the guidance for more favorable timing for our area. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CIPS is not super-honking (the threat is there - it's just more muted). 

If nothing else - I am hoping for an event where I am working from home for a change (or at least in the area...) 

That said - a confirmed TOR passed near me up in PA Saturday evening (the Houtzdale/Whiteside, PA one confirmed by CTP). Was a few miles away. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ThePhotoGuy said:

This was the strongest and most damaging storm that I have ever witnessed in my area in Pasadena. At least 10 times worse than the derecho. Over 2 dozen trees knocked down on homes and cars in my neighborhood and another community. I saw at least 5 homes marked unsafe for entry by county inspections. I haven't ventured further down Fort Smallwood where there is even more destruction. 

That looks like 65 mph damage, there were pockets of 80 in there from TDWR. Locally more damaging than the '12 derecho. I think the derecho only had 50-65 in the Pasadena / Rivera Beach area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Day 2 Convective Outlook  
   NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK
   1230 PM CDT Mon Jul 20 2026

   Valid 211200Z - 221200Z

   ...THERE IS AN ENHANCED RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS ACROSS PORTIONS
   OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INTO THE MID-ATLANTIC...

   ...SUMMARY...
   Numerous severe thunderstorms are expected across a broad region
   from the Ohio Valley into the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast on Tuesday.
   All severe hazards are possible, but swaths of damaging wind gusts
   should be the primary severe risk Tuesday afternoon into the
   nighttime hours.

   ...Synopsis...
   High amplitude ridging will build across the western US with
   continued progressive troughing across the east on Tuesday. Multiple
   short-wave impulses will rotate through the eastern US trough, with
   a belt of enhanced northwesterly flow traversing the Midwest into
   the Ohio Valley. At the surface, a cold front will shift south and
   east through the period, with a surface low across southern
   Ontario/Quebec. A pre-frontal surface trough will also be in place
   across western/central NY into the Mid-Atlantic vicinity. Widely
   scattered thunderstorm activity is expected through the period.

   ...Mid-Atlantic and Northeast...
   Thunderstorm activity is expected to increase along the pre-frontal
   trough from western/central New York into the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
   late Tuesday morning into the afternoon. Though there may be
   potential for early morning cloud cover, it does appear that
   sufficient heating/moistening will occur for at least moderate
   instability to develop across the region through the afternoon.
   Mid-level flow will increase through the day along with forcing for
   ascent. It appears widely scattered thunderstorm activity with
   several clusters/embedded supercells will be ongoing by the
   afternoon. Highest confidence in transient embedded supercell modes
   would be closer to the surface low and near the front across western
   NY into eastern PA. Here, there may be potential for both damaging
   wind, large hail, and perhaps a couple of tornadoes. Guidance
   suggests the best signal for damaging wind will be across the
   Mid-Atlantic, where several damaging clusters could occur. As such,
   the Enhanced was expanded eastward into portions of the
   Mid-Atlantic. 

   ...Ohio Valley...
   Evolution of overnight convection will play a large role in
   development/maintenance of thunderstorm activity across the Ohio
   Valley Tuesday. It appears that remnant convection will be ongoing
   at the start of the period near/just ahead of the surface front
   across northern Kentucky/southern Indiana/Ohio. This will likely
   re-intensify and continue to expand south and east during the
   morning as daytime heating begins. Strong daytime heating and moist
   profiles should support moderate to strong instability developing
   though the afternoon. Storm mode appears to be generally linear,
   with the greatest threat being for damaging wind given more linear
   forcing/initially boundary parallel shear along residual southward
   moving outflow. As such, the primary hazard will be damaging wind. 

   Additional thunderstorm development is likely along and ahead of the
   front through the afternoon with increasing forcing for ascent with
   approaching shortwaves. Strong deep layer shear may become more
   boundary perpendicular supporting a supercell or two as the front
   sags south, with potential for large hail and perhaps a tornado.
   Confidence in this scenario is on the lower end and the primary
   hazard is expected to be a secondary wave of damaging wind
   potential. Should storms be able to cluster and establish a more
   organized cold pool, potential for some corridor of significant wind
   may be possible. Overall, no significant wind areas were included
   given low confidence in exact morning storm evolution and concerns
   over generally poor lapse rates.

   ..Thornton.. 07/20/2026
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

D2 ENH is the new D2 MOD in these parts. 

Well I also think exactly what we all thought would happen with the new outlooks this year, has happened. 

It truly is that with forecasting advances, 45%+ is just not going to be super uncommon anymore. Everything has probably shifted upwards a tier. So 60% may be the new 45%. I think we will continue to see a higher incidence of 45% wind days. It does *not* mean that there will be more outbreak days. 

We have to sort of re-train our brains at least on the wind side of the outlooks. We used to get super amped for a 45% wind day....that will be like a 30% in the past. Sure - it's better than 15% but it's not like a derecho is coming through. 

If 2012 evolved in this new outlook scheme - as SPC upgraded that night with the line approaching - we probably would have gotten a 90% prob...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double post but deal with it :lol: 

We all need to just consider the outlook meanings as a whole. a severe report within 25 miles of a point can be VERY high confidence especially in highly populated areas where there are now an abundance of spotters and average joes sending reports in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kmlwx said:

Well I also think exactly what we all thought would happen with the new outlooks this year, has happened. 

It truly is that with forecasting advances, 45%+ is just not going to be super uncommon anymore. Everything has probably shifted upwards a tier. So 60% may be the new 45%. I think we will continue to see a higher incidence of 45% wind days. It does *not* mean that there will be more outbreak days. 

We have to sort of re-train our brains at least on the wind side of the outlooks. We used to get super amped for a 45% wind day....that will be like a 30% in the past. Sure - it's better than 15% but it's not like a derecho is coming through. 

If 2012 evolved in this new outlook scheme - as SPC upgraded that night with the line approaching - we probably would have gotten a 90% prob...

Agreed. Unfortunately, my confidence in SPC has really been shaken since they've changed these outlooks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...