Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,663
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    tmcandrew
    Newest Member
    tmcandrew
    Joined

2026 Mid-Atlantic Severe Storm General Discussion


Kmlwx
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yea definitely looks like a tornado somewhere between Libertytown and New Windsor:

Quote

The Frederick Scanner
9:25 pm: Chief 17 establishing command. Frederick 911 reports possible structure collapse with horse(s) trapped on Bessie Clemson Rd. Requesting ATV/UTV.
9:35 pm: Frederick ECC advises they heard from property owner of the collapsed structure; property owner confirms no horses trapped. Structure is total loss.
9:36 pm: Brush 175 was flagged down by farmer who reports wires down and structural damage.
9:42 pm: Brush 175 reports numerous structures damaged as well as farm equipment rolled over.
9:47 pm: Battalion Chief 902 requesting additional resources to respond to the intersection of Rte. 31 and Bessie Clemson Rd, will disperse resources form that location. Requesting County Highways to respond to assist with clearing debris.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wxmeddler said:


This is an issue with MADIS. The 83 mph gust is from a sonic anemometer on top of the Bay Bridge. That is the first report. The second 83 mph report in Parole is false, it’s due to a bug that duplicates the Bay Bridge sensor at SHA headquarters in Parole. The lay/lon is wrong in MADIS. The 75 mph gust is from a buoy at the mouth of the Severn.

Are their systematic issues w/ sonic anemometers?   W/ all the new mesonet sites in MD the last few years, are we seeing wind measurement issues often?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, vortex95 said:

Are their systematic issues w/ sonic anemometers?   W/ all the new mesonet sites in MD the last few years, are we seeing wind measurement issues often?

Sonic Anemometers in general have systematic issues when there is dust / pollen or other particulates in the air. Even rain coming in sideways interferes with the calculations. Which, guess what, is common when there are gust fronts / thunderstorms. Some brands of sonic's have better error rejection than others, but for whatever reason Vaisala's are particularly bad. Which is a shame because it's what both ASOS and many DOT/RWIS networks use.

The "Mesonet" source in the LSR's is a catch all for all different networks including DOT and even some of the PWS stations. It's an issue with the LSR program, there is not enough categories to properly differentiate an actual state mesonet (like MD Mesonet) and a RWIS network like MD SHA's. 

All MD Mesonet sites use traditional propeller anemometers. RM Young 05108's to be exact. MD SHA's RWIS network uses "all-in-one" T/RH/Sonic for reduced maintenance intervals / costs. But they are not good. lol.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent storms last night, picked up .37”

Was watching a left mover up in York County 8-9pm that probably should have be tornado warned well before it actually was. Friend who lives in Stewartstown got hit hard, cell was tornado warned after it passed her but I saw broad rotation on radar well before it hit her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

SPC maintains the 15% for D4 (Thursday) and mentions the usual fail potential alleys: clouds, timing, etc. That being said, any time you get a decent jet just to our north and a reasonably hot/humid airmass...interesting things can happen. 

Even despite the factors this potential even has going for it - I'm kind of "meh" on it for now. Not necessarily truly meh - but I'm just not feeling it so far. Will see how things look once it gets closer in time. I suspect we won't really have any SOLID clarity until 11am the morning of lol. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kmlwx said:

Even despite the factors this potential even has going for it - I'm kind of "meh" on it for now. Not necessarily truly meh - but I'm just not feeling it so far. Will see how things look once it gets closer in time. I suspect we won't really have any SOLID clarity until 11am the morning of lol. 

I'm kind of in the same boat as you. Still, we've seen what marginal surface instability and good dynamics can do in these parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Eskimo Joe said:

I'm kind of in the same boat as you. Still, we've seen what marginal surface instability and good dynamics can do in these parts.

Truth! Severe weather around here is a perfect example of what tiny factors can change about an event...no two events are the same even with seemingly nearly identical parameters. 

Snow gets all the glory of forecast busts - but I really think severe weather busts are MUCH more finicky. 

  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what LWX had in their AFD this morning re Thursday 

Beginning Thursday, a strong surface low will push east past the
Great Lakes with a stemming cold front that will push across the
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. This cold front could result in multiple
showers and thunderstorms throughout the region, with some becoming
severe. There is already a 30%-45% severe probability noted in
NCAR`s AI model, and a 15%-30% severe probability noted in CSU`s ML
model. Timing and exact hazards are still the primary uncertainties
being 5 days out, but early markers are definitely showing an
early widespread severe risk with this system.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Afternoon AFD from LWX 

KEY MESSAGE 1...Heat and humidity returns for Thursday, along
with chances for severe thunderstorms.

A potent shortwave on the southern periphery of a much broader upper
low over Canada will track through the Great Lakes on Wednesday
night. This will force a highly anomalous area of low pressure
to track across the eastern Great Lakes. In fact, this low could
potentially break all-time minimum sea level pressure records for
the month of June across portions of Wisconsin and Michigan as it
tracks through later Wednesday into Wednesday night. Most solutions
have this low tracking across southern Ontario and Quebec at around
985-990 hPa on Thursday. An unseasonably strong wind field aloft
will accompany the highly anomalous low, as 850 hPa winds climb to
around 30-50 knots and 500 hPa winds increase to in excess of 50
knots. Low-level south to southwesterly flow will also draw a hot
and humid airmass north into the area. Temperatures are forecast to
soar into the upper 80s and 90s across the bulk of the forecast
area, while dewpoints increase into the mid to upper 60s. This
overlap of a very hot and humid airmass with highly anomalous winds
aloft raises concerns for severe thunderstorms locally on Thursday.
It`s still to early to get into the finer scale details, but
soundings show an environment that is very favorable for the
production of damaging winds. SPC currently has the entire area
outlooked with a Slight Risk for severe thunderstorms. We`ll
continue to monitor this threat for severe thunderstorms over the
coming days.

Even outside of thunderstorms, winds should be breezy, potentially
gusting in excess of 30 mph even in clear air. The combination of
heat and background winds will be something that we don`t experience
often here in the Mid-Atlantic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...