Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,623
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

“Cory’s in NYC! Let’s HECS!” Feb. 22-24 Disco


TheSnowman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

That March 2018 event was also progged to jack SE MA on the clowns.

I remember that! Some mets where very stubborn on air to move the banding from the Southshore further northwest which as we know it did.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

The differences between the 18 Z and the 06ZGFS are attributable to noise and are essentially meaningless. 

i’m not even sure this one counts as stopping the trend Northwest.  we need to get another cycle because this looks like it’s almost an identical track. It’s too close to judge. The defining difference is that QPF distribution;  it’s probably splitting hairs when the pressure is actually deeper on this solution,below 970.  

Agreed.

00z GEFS are actually more robust than 18z GEFS.

IMG_0548.jpeg.425b4501720d142c9d80525e728b0151.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

The differences between the 18 Z and the 00z GFS are attributable to noise and are essentially meaningless. 

i’m not even sure this one counts as stopping the trend Northwest.  we need to get another cycle because this looks like it’s almost an identical track. It’s too close to judge. The defining difference is that QPF distribution;  it’s probably splitting hairs when the pressure is actually deeper on this solution,below 970.  

Yes first thing I thought of was about 20 years ago Will pointed out that QPF is often under modeled on the KUs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

The differences between the 18 Z and the 00z GFS are attributable to noise and are essentially meaningless. 

i’m not even sure this one counts as stopping the trend Northwest.  we need to get another cycle because this looks like it’s almost an identical track. It’s too close to judge. The defining difference is that QPF distribution;  it’s probably splitting hairs when the pressure is actually deeper on this solution,below 970.  

GEFS amped up even more 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind a tick back. Some of the more tucked solutions, like ukie start to bring ptype issues into play, and I don't like that. The logic is always that you make up for it on the back end,but where I live, you usually don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

1z Feb 21 NBM output

48 hours ending 1am Tuesday.

Yeah we're going there. Box will likely have big headlines Saturday.

NBM_Feb_21_0z.jpg.ea2dbfcf206848ed8a6ef7c1de7d4573.jpg

I remember not very long ago the exact spot that’s now in the 24”+ dark red was a nasty snow hole that kept getting screwed so many ways in December.

But in the end, snow holes get filled up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NeonPeon said:

I don't mind a tick back. Some of the more tucked solutions, like ukie start to bring ptype issues into play, and I don't like that. The logic is always that you make up for it on the back end,but where I live, you usually don't. 

I'm glad everything else kept coming NW...GFS was due for kickback...It had come west like 10 consecutive runs, at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Wow, 00z GFS very noticeable tick back...of course, right as I go apeshit on my call.

I looked at it. It’s not that noticeable.
Put it this way it’s within a margin of air of noise and it doesn’t make any difference. It’s actually deeper so it’s splitting hairs

The biggest difference is the QPF distribution, but we’ve already been over that. There’s more guidance source is still doing the northwest ticking so I don’t think it means anything yet. We need more than one cycle that and it has to be more obvious than what I’m seeing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

I looked at it. It’s not that noticeable.
Put it this way it’s within a margin of air of noise and it doesn’t make any difference. It’s actually deeper so it’s splitting hairs

The biggest difference is the QPF distribution, but I’ve already been over that

I was just on the phone with Cory and I called it noise, too....but the QPF did piss me off lol

Where was your post on the QPF distribution?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I was just on the phone with Cory and I called it noise, too....but the QPF did piss me off lol

Where was your post on the QPF distribution?

We talked about it last night or maybe it was a night before?  QPF is not nearly as important as identifying the machinery the cyclone at this range cause that’s gonna get moved around like kids with finger paint for the next 24 to 48 hours.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TheSnowman said:

You mean……. Cory is….. FINALLY going to get to live…….. What he Missed while stuck i with the gf on the Florida Keys and be even Better…?  :wub:  

 

Oh wait I’ll be in NYC.  

Go get lost in Central Park. Will be a top tier experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Henry's Weather said:

Resemblance

IMG_9157.jpeg

Close but not quite in the final quantity. In the that 1978 analysis the 1.5" was the equivalence around 23.0" of snow due to ratios which they stated was a crude estimate at the time but one should get the point. The Cape got less in that due to the track and dry slought of the storm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...