Allsnow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I don’t think I have ever seen a snow map from the ICON displaying that much snow. It’s usually very conservative on every storm 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mail Man Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I mean everyone knows we're not getting the 40 burgers but damn that what was a hell of a run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdt Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Orographic liftI like to say orographic enhancement . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathstar9 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Only storm I can find in the KU book with a gradient approaching 80MB is the March 1914 hyper bomb. 952 MB low (strongest non tropical ever recorded in the NE). Roughly a 1028-30 high centered over Iowa. NYC recorded an 84mph gust in that storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MANDA Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, Tatamy said: Orographic lift That and models POSSIBLY sniffing out some banding features. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2/22 00z ICON Total QPF 2/22-2/23-24 10:1 Snow 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wthrmn654 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 5 minutes ago, IrishRob17 said: What do you mean by access? Like to go see them in person? I’m part of the Davis network and can see all the Davis stations everywhere as far as I know. Digital access. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForestHillWx Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 For us northwest folk, that weenie band has been showing up on multiple runs. That should be the secondary max location; I’m thinking Cherry Ridge/Highland Lakes. This is truly generational shit. I’m pumped. ‘96 is still the king to me, but let’s see how she compares. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wthrmn654 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 6 minutes ago, IrishRob17 said: What do you mean by access? Like to go see them in person? I’m part of the Davis network and can see all the Davis stations everywhere as far as I know. Not every station is on davis network Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 58 minutes ago, SACRUS said: 2/22 00z Summary Total QPF NYC / Total 10:1 Snow SREF mean: 2.2 / 21 NAM: 2.8 / 27.5 NAM 3k: 2.0 / 19.5 ICON: 1.4 / 13.5 Updated ICON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 10 minutes ago, Nibor said: Does my sick weenie mind still want it to verify...absolutely 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2/22 00z RGEM Total QPF 2/22-2/23-24 10:1 Snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psv88 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Can’t believe I’m missing this one. Shame 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northof78 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 15 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said: I should go to bed I got work at 6 am but I can't pull away... must watch.... models Sleep 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJW014 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Yardstick has been purchased. A ruler will do no good 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 3 minutes ago, psv88 said: Can’t believe I’m missing this one. Shame Don't go away in the winter 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatamy Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Regarding the output from the RDPS, it’s similar to the run at 12z. This is the CMC ensemble run from 12z. If someone can explain the difference between these I would be interested to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prue11 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 This will clearly rival feb 2013 in Suffolk. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 4 minutes ago, psv88 said: Can’t believe I’m missing this one. Shame I know it sucks. It would eat away at me. This isn't the last one we'll see though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North and West Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I have to take this with me into the bathroom for a minute… A whole minute? Mr. Romantic.. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Rgem sucks ass 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastalplainsnowman Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 28 minutes ago, Tatamy said: I personally experienced winds of this force in February 1983 on the north shore of Suffolk Cty. and had good equipment to measure it. It has happened before and can happen again. Thanks - I'm sure and I wouldn't doubt you at all. I'm just saying that I haven't seen that pan out much, just like the elusive rain that changes back to snow, and the 'this storm will be going strong for 36 hours' which seems to always fall short. Maybe I'm really asking for it though making this argument with this particular storm. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SACRUS Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2/22 00z WRF Total QPF 2/22 - 2/23-24 10:1 Snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liwxfan Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 3 minutes ago, Prue11 said: This will clearly rival feb 2013 in That's what I'm thinking too.. didn't know if that would ever happen again. If it's going to this is as good a chance as any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hooralph Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 25 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said: I'm gonna try to be objective from a normie perspective but the amount of damage that would occur from the NAM verifying would be extreme. We're talking major coastal flooding, major power outages, a shutdown for days. Something out of this world. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Have to see if other mesos start picking up on the stalling idea… would be epic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastalplainsnowman Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 25 minutes ago, wthrmn654 said: I should go to bed I got work at 6 am but I can't pull away... must watch.... models I can't tell you how many times I've broken away to catch up on emails only to find myself back here scrolling, not remembering ever making the conscious decision to flip back here.. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriPol Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 24 minutes ago, Allsnow said: I don’t think I have ever seen a snow map from the ICON displaying that much snow. It’s usually very conservative on every storm Maybe the ICON is being conservative. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now