Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,686
    Total Members
    11,691
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

Possible coastal storm centered on Feb 1 2026.


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Maybe this is how you get winter enthusiasts to finally stop playing the "I'm not a denier while failing to admit CC is playing a factor" game ... By consummately bending them over with this fast flow shit, their bums may finally reach quota of violation enough to penetrate their minds with it.  haha

Tough sell.  I'm below normal since November and at my seasonal average snowfall with 15" pack I can nearly walk on in late Jan, peak winter.  Missing a super anomaly blizzard doesn't quite make the case.  I'm all in on CC, but she's sitting this winter out in our region.  

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Maybe it ends up missing, but I can tell you all of the pieces aren't nailed at this range...doesn't have to mean it shifts in our favor, but this isn't the 100% accurate as modeled, either.

Yep still 3.5-4 days away.   Also think the GFS and some others are chasing convection-doubt there's multiple lows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

I’m not sold on the late tug back NW on the gfs. I doubt that verifies like that.

What a nuke for the cape, and even a warning event into se Mass. 

I'm not sold on anything yet.. it will probably be Friday before we figure this out

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! Here we are 3-4 days out from the evolution of a very complex / incredibly unusual upper-level setup, and this is being dismissed, as a gone / done deal?  Based on short-term trends of the ICON, NAM, GFS, etc... Maybe this ends up being a miss for most, but sitting here on Wednesday morning and pulling the plug on a weekend storm based on the less than perfect trends (ICON, GFS, CMC, NAM) is a bit baffling?  We are still looking at a wild 500 mb evolution that a day ago was being labeled as historic with lots of uncertainty as to whether or not it was believable.  How many of the "it's gone" believers will shut their computers off and not turn it back on until early next week to follow the next threat?  Lol... Some of this is in jest, but the doom and gloom & confidence being professed it a bit over the top given the setup... just saying...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Weenie 1
  • 100% 6
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ChangeofSeasonsWX said:

I never said it wont happen, just that the odds of getting two back to back storms that drop feet of snow is low. Just talking probability thats all. Doesn't mean that it wont happen.

It is also a low probability to even have a major threat less than a week after a biggie. But here we are....whether it hits or not. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChangeofSeasonsWX said:

I never said it wont happen, just that the odds of getting two back to back storms that drop feet of snow is low. Just talking probability thats all. Doesn't mean that it wont happen.

We actually have seen that occurrence here.  Let’s go to 2015.  A 2 footer followed a week later by an 16 incher followed a week later by a 2 footer followed a week later by a 16 incher.  The pattern doesn’t play the probability game but to your point, everything has to go perfectly right and that’s hard.

  • Like 4
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, weathafella said:

I remember 2 buggies that were close in misses recently that this kind of is reminiscent of.

1.  March 2014-a 75 mile difference between flurries and a blizzard.

2. March 2020-same

Brutal...it was in the days leading into the funeral services for my dad. I remember desperately seeking an escape on my cell while gathered with family to clean out his home, only to find a White Juan redux in NS. Blustery, cold (dry) unsympathetic month that was-

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weathafella said:

We actually have seen that occurrence here.  Let’s go to 2015.  A 2 footer followed a week later by an 16 incher followed a week later by a 2 footer followed a week later by a 16 incher.  The pattern doesn’t play the probability game but to your point, everything has to go perfectly right and that’s hard.

Right 2015 is a perfect example of that where every factor had to line up perfectly and it did. I hope that this one crushes us also. We all need it after this stretch that we've had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...