Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

January 24-26: Miracle or Mirage Thread 2


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

mod to heavier precip would be I would think...light stuff mix but who cares. We know the drill 

I hope the GFS is right, but we know it tends to be too cold/south.  And because its on it's own, I don't have a lot of confidence in it.  But it truly is the best case scenario

  • Like 4
  • Weenie 1
  • 100% 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

GFS is more of a two-parter than some of the other models.  First comes through cold and all snow.  Looks like the 2nd is going to be latitudinally-dependent.  

00Z Monday DCA

808547198_2026012212_GFS_084_38.91-77.11_winter_mu.thumb.png.7f8b15d9ab987df78f692deea300336b.png

Yup...this is what I was getting at just above. Even just slightly west of the Beltway is a *touch* better.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

Only concern with the de amp is it could mess up our initial thump if things go really poorly but that’s probably an irrational fear. 

I'm talking very modest. Qpf distribution is really locking in right now and it's a massive swath. I don't see much of a chance for that to fall apart at this point. 

8 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said:

@Bob ChillGFS showing the death band as well at hr 66 running pretty much the entirety of the 460 corridor. Interesting trend to say the least.

The hours before the flip to sleet are almost always wild with WAA snows. Giant flakes and low vis heavies commonly precede the sandstorm. I'm pretty excited for that part. I want the gfs to be right so bad... but until the euro ticks that direction it feels like fools gold 

  • Like 5
  • Sad 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

I hope the GFS is right, but we know it tends to be too cold/south.  And because its on it's own, I don't have a lot of confidence in it.  But it truly is the best case scenario

For last week's storm, GFS was the model to overamplify around 60-90 hours out only to scale back some as we got closer versus Euro and CMC were way less diggy with the shortwave. A blend sounds about right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow manage to stay all snow on GFS. Actually surprised totals aren’t higher with the fluff and duration. Snows on some for 36ish hours. Guess the colder solution also packs less of a punch but seems like a worthy trade-off. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS looks beautiful, but am I wrong to note that every time we have a setup like this, the Euro and NAM end up modeling the rain/sleet line way better than the GFS? Feels like the GFS always wants to make everything "all snow" in these kinds of setups and it almost always fails.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ErinInTheSky said:

GFS looks beautiful, but am I wrong to note that every time we have a setup like this, the Euro and NAM end up modeling the rain/sleet line way better than the GFS? Feels like the GFS always wants to make everything "all snow" in these kinds of setups and it almost always fails.

The December 26th storm did this. The NAM nailed the sleet in central Jersey when GFS was saying snow. The mix line always tends to punch north faster and further than what the GFS says. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

At minimum all of this is snow on the GFS AI:

1769342400-OYW4W0vaz6I.png

Most of us lose 700mb by a hair between 72-78... where totals jump to this. Lot of sleet after.

1769364000-t0MmcrnsLJ0.png

Yeah this is not a small difference between the AIGFS and GFS. Latter is way better for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

I hope the GFS is right, but we know it tends to be too cold/south.  And because its on it's own, I don't have a lot of confidence in it.  But it truly is the best case scenario

It definitely won't see the mid level warm layers as well as the euro/nam when we get closer... but could it be correct about a less amplified system?  Sure.  Would I stake anything I care about on it...no.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ErinInTheSky said:

GFS looks beautiful, but am I wrong to note that every time we have a setup like this, the Euro and NAM end up modeling the rain/sleet line way better than the GFS? Feels like the GFS always wants to make everything "all snow" in these kinds of setups and it almost always fails.

The GFS doesn't see mid level thermals as well as the Euro or NAM...that is a known thing  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...