Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,673
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    dorkchop
    Newest Member
    dorkchop
    Joined

January 2026 Medium/Long Range Discussion


snowfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

True story about the number one analogue (March 2-3 1980) ... I was briefly working at Accu-weather to provide info about Canadian forecasting markets they might investigate, and their practice before a big storm was to have every forecaster draw up a map of personal snowfall estimates. Joe Bastardi of all people was in that group. I was drawing up maps for them, not providing forecasts, as I am not (was not) a degreed met, but I did draw up a forecast map and had it on a wall full of maps, and as I recall it had some pretty aggressive numbers in s.e. VA. They would then discuss all the maps ... The one person in the room who didn't say "oh that looks wrong" about my numbers was JB who I think had similar numbers on his map. You may recall, there had not been a lot of snow anywhere in the winter of 1979-80, I recall one moderate fall of about 6" across PA around Feb 10th maybe, otherwise bare ground especially further north, into the Great Lakes and northeast.

Anyway, we ended up busting low but had some influence on the group consensus. (well Joe did probably) The storm dropped well over 20" in Norfolk and Virginia Beach. I think it dropped 6 to 10 inches in the DC to Baltimore region and cut off around York, PHL and ACY. At the time it was record cold all over the eastern states, this would have been maybe Feb 29th 1980 or March 1st at the latest. It was an interesting two months of weather that followed, including a monster cutoff rainstorm over the northeast in early April and hot weather records from the mid-south to the east coast in late April. My time there ended on April 30th and I didn't maintain any connections but I have met some of the well-known people at Accu-wx and it is quite the hive of weather activity hidden away in the university town of State College PA. I recall Joe as a very friendly and gregarious person who often went balls to the wall compared to the more conservative senior forecasters, and was regarded as the rising star at the time. I think I was more of a setting moon. That's where I developed my interest in long-range forecasting, they were looking at getting into that area, and I participated in a couple of brainstorming sessions, once again, maps on a wall. I remember April 1980 coming out with huge positive anomalies over the south central U.S. in advance of a very hot summer. It all grabbed my interest and I began to look for methodologies that might work using date-shifted lunar analogues (a similar pattern where you refined the timing by shifting the dates to make lunar calendar similar ... I had worked out somehow that this is the method used by the Farmers Almanac, although they based their similar years on things like solar cycles and previous few months of anomalies. I worked this out by first figuring out what winter they were using and noticing a date shift that was explained by the moon's orbital cycles in that winter compared to 1979-80.

Was it worth it? Maybe not, it has been a voice in the wilderness sort of journey to say the least. But it is what it is. 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Nomz said:

They tell pretty much the same story though, no?
image.thumb.png.c99602e09c905e34caf0deb80c2f0e7b.pngimage.thumb.png.6a00fac564afae91eb20346b725e9f1d.png

No they don't. They show 2 very different things. Vorticity (or Positive Vorticity Advection/PVA for our purposes with storms) shows rotation and lift in the atmosphere. This is caused by upper level level winds so the plots bear resemblance but they are not the same things at all. Vorticity maps should be visualized 3 dimensionally while wind maps are basically 2 dimensional.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob Chill said:

No they don't. They show 2 very different things. Vorticity (or Positive Vorticity Advection/PVA for our purposes with storms) shows rotation and lift in the atmosphere. This is caused by upper level level winds so the plots bear resemblance but they are not the same things at all. Vorticity maps should be visualized 3 dimensionally while wind maps are basicslly 2 dimensional.

What do you mean by "Vorticity maps should be visualized 3 dimensionally"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Nomz said:

What do you mean by "Vorticity maps should be visualized 3 dimensionally"?

Think of it like this, you're flying on a jet into 150mph headwinds and it's nice and smooth. Would never know it's windy up there. That's the wind map. Suddenly your drink is on the ceiling and people are puking. That's the vorticity map

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

part of afternoon AFD from Sterling - still keeping everything on the table while pointing out the 12Z shift in most (non-GFS) models towards an OTS solution:
 

KEY MESSAGE 3...Monitoring the potential for a coastal system
this weekend.

We continue to monitor the potential for snow associated with a
coastal low this weekend. Nearly all model solutions show a strong
coastal low forming, but there`s still considerable uncertainty
regarding both where that low will track, and what impacts we will
experience locally. Potential outcomes range anywhere from a storm
that tracks well out to sea with little impact locally, to a storm
that tracks closer to the coast and produces heavy snowfall across
the region.

The general flow pattern forecast by models has many of the synoptic
features associated with Mid-Atlantic snowstorms, with ridging along
the West Coast, troughing along the East Coast, ample cold air
in place at the surface, and then downstream blocking over the
North Atlantic. However, the trend with incoming EPS and GEPS
trended significantly downward with probabilities for snow,
ultimately showing a further southeast and out to sea track. The
12z GFS shows the potential snowier solution, and GEFS
probabilities for snow trended upward. Spatially speaking,
probabilities are highest for snow in all guidance the further
southeast you go. In our area, southern Maryland would have the
greatest chance at seeing snow.

It`s worth noting that the flow pattern at upper levels preceding
this storm is highly complex. The primary disturbance that will
ultimately contribute to the development of the system is actually
located over Newfoundland currently and will rotate westward around
an upper low centered over Hudson Bay, before turning southward and
digging out the trough that will eventually provide the forcing for
the development of the coastal low. As this disturbance turns
southward, it will also be influenced by an upper low over Alaska
and a building ridge over the West Coast. Given the high complexity
of these interactions, it may take another 1-2 days for models to
settle into a higher confidence solution, and as a result, the door
is still open for large forecast shifts.
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Discussion

The ongoing settling of cold surface high pressure and additional
surges in the wake of the historic winter storm will maintain
dangerously cold temperatures for the central and eastern U.S. well
into next week as per the Climate Prediction Center. The airmass
may be more prolonged in areas with widespread snow/ice coverage
and enhanced radiational cooling. Amplified mean troughing aloft
will meanwhile bring rounds of weak to moderate clipper system
snows from the north-central U.S. to the Great Lakes.

In this anomalously cold pattern, there is potential for wintry
precipitation into the Gulf Coast states late week as upper trough
translation leads into northern Gulf frontal wave genesis. Wave
progression downstream and trough/closed low development aloft is
now increasingly likely to set the environment to produce a
significant Eastern Seaboard Coastal Winter storm expected to
rapidly deepen while lifting over the western Atlantic off the
Southeast Saturday and Mid-Atlantic/New England Sunday. Uncertainty
has improved but remains with the exact track of the low which
impacts the onshore wintry precipitation focus and footprint.
However,
the growing consensus at this time is for heavy snow potential
from the eastern Carolinas/Mid-Atlantic through coastal southern
New England. The forecast strength of the deep low suggests high
winds/waves and coastal flooding would also be expected.

 
  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

That AFD from Sterling was a mic drop.  They said wait and see and don’t get married to any model run until tomorrow.  Hard to argue that one. 

I suggested Thursday depending on sampling 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bob Chill said:

CIPS analogs from the 12z gfs run are quite weenie'ish... lol

Goodness, that's like a Who's Who of greatest hits.

I like one of the mets comments in here from earlier this morning.  It's a powerful and delicate setup.  It'll be fun to see how this unfolds.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...