Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,379
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Scott Koziara
    Newest Member
    Scott Koziara
    Joined

The Return of the 12/5 Snowstorm


SnowenOutThere
 Share

Recommended Posts

NWS has WWA for 2-4 here, we shall see. Funny that the 'high end' keeps going up, yesterday at this time my location had a 30% chance at 4" and a 5% chance of 6". As of the last update I'm now at 55% chance of 4", 30% chance of 6" and 5% chance at 8". Think that may be high unless we get 15 to 18-1 ratios. I'll be thrilled with the 2-4 in forecast verifying.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

12z FV3 way north of its 0z. Flurries to I70.

Definitely feeling more confident in seeing "something" vs. a complete miss.  Toggling through some of the other models (crappy ones mostly while bored), everything seems to pushing coverage north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like a general consensus being drummed up via CAMs this morning. Feel like flurries will reach north of I-70 with measurable (0.1”+) probably around I-70 with a small incremental increase the further south you go.

Rt50 is likely the dividing line for where 1” is possible in this scenario across VA/MD. Slightly better chance north of Rt50 as you get into Sussex County DE.
 

Best chance will be I-66 on south with 2-4” local to 6” across Southwest VA true Central VA, albeit lower side of things as you come off the terrain. 

System struggling to gain latitude and the drier antecedent airmass will be the main issue for majority of the sub. Bob Chill and Wxdude-ville will have the best opportunity here. CVille folks will have a nice little snowfall to start the season as well. 

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wxdude64 said:

Appears River/bay enhanced?? Would a model pick up something like that?

With all the love I have for the NWS I can't get with the high-end snow map. Uniquely terrible - minus for weenie entertainment - and if the purpose is to inform EMS/other partners about a "realistic" worse case scenario they fail miserably. The computer generated 8-12" corridors and the water-driven enhancement makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...