Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,365
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Patruthseaker
    Newest Member
    Patruthseaker
    Joined

12/2 Cold Rain and High Elevation Snow


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, rjvanals said:

Both NAMs continue to hate this system and insist we torch at 850

        This is bothering me a lot, as the NAMs are usually the colder solutions.  I think we're still in the range where the NAM could be having synoptic issues, but if it continues on Monday to keep the accumulations further northwest of the I-95 corridor, I'm going to guess it's right.   The faster onset, shown by the GFS and its hi-res HiResW FV3, would help a ton here, although even where it shows snow, the thermal profile has pretty much zero margin for error.

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, high risk said:

        This is bothering me a lot, as the NAMs are usually the colder solutions.  I think we're still in the range where the NAM could be having synoptic issues, but if it continues on Monday to keep the accumulations further northwest of the I-95 corridor, I'm going to guess it's right.   The faster onset, shown by the GFS and its hi-res HiResW FV3, would help a ton here, although even where it shows snow, the thermal profile has pretty much zero margin for error.

I mean this sounding from the Catoctins really says it all. Though, it appears if you're able to keep the column cool it will be dumping with a saturated atmosphere up to 500mb and good lift in the DGZ

hrrr_2025120100_040_39.63--77.46.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...