Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,391
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Kabraxis
    Newest Member
    Kabraxis
    Joined

December 2025 regional war/obs/disco thread


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

May need to watch for a C-1" type deal tomorrow night as that first weakening shortwave moves through ahead of the main clipper shortwave. Could also just be a few flurries...depends if we can saturate the column enough. 

I guess for most, anything that comes will wash away on Wednesday, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

May need to watch for a C-1" type deal tomorrow night as that first weakening shortwave moves through ahead of the main clipper shortwave. Could also just be a few flurries...depends if we can saturate the column enough. 

Yeah 12km NAM has about 0.1" of liquid and it's pretty cold of course.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

I guess for most, anything that comes will wash away on Wednesday, no?

Yeah probably...warm enough to melt a coating or an inch of snow most likely. Interior elevations N of pike might keep new snow (they also have a current snowpack anyway from 12/2)....but further south and east near 84 and 495 prob low 40s on Wednesday...maybe warmer even further SE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

S/w a little more south on this run. Grazes south coast. 

Yeah also some lower heights in SE Canada (they are never there these days when we need them)....in addition to the ridge being a little flatter at 132h. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

May need to watch for a C-1" type deal tomorrow night as that first weakening shortwave moves through ahead of the main clipper shortwave. Could also just be a few flurries...depends if we can saturate the column enough. 

Yeah that’s of interest to me. 

27 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

I guess for most, anything that comes will wash away on Wednesday, no?

We want to get on the board. As many times as possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

That 18z gfs run looks a lot like the euro, which isn’t a good thing. A scraper with marginal temps on the south coast.

The differences are subtle, but they were evident kind of earlier in the run. Not a ton of time to change those for the better

Not a ton but enough...I wouldn't throw in the towel til 00z Thursday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

The ceiling isn’t like a KU or anything so a tweak here and there turns it into a 5-8 job.

Right. What needs to change to slow the flow? -NAO? I thought we had that already. I would definitely be feeling pretty good out your way (and TBlizz) for an advisory event anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

No, but am I wrong in thinking the features that decide what will happen are getting setup sooner rather than later?

I think Wiz pointed this out earlier 

Coming from a bad area of observations though. 
I would like to see some consistency and improvement over the next few days, but it doesn’t have to happen overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be interesting for someone to do a case study on the accuracy of model forecasts for these shortwaves that originate in areas with lower amounts of sample data.  My totally half-assed ignorant theory is that as the model resolution has increased over the last few years, paired with the faster flow we've had, it causes more run-to-run inconsistencies on the operational models for these types of storms.  If the flow was a little slower, there would be time of the physics to catch up to the shortwaves as they develop and provide a more consistent forecast.  We often do not get consensus on the info we need to determine snowfall amounts until a day or two before because many of the storms that have been happening over the last few years have been fast movers.  Not a lot of systems stalling and/or phasing, and when they do, they are usually modeled better.

The older lower resolution models may have been less sensitive to this problem, though may have not generated a more accurate forecasts, just one that was more consistently wrong until go time.  And as usual, we are often talking about differences in tracks of 50 or 100 miles to determine snow amounts, which is more difficult to pin down compared to just plain rain during other parts of the year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Coming from a bad area of observations though. 
I would like to see some consistency and improvement over the next few days, but it doesn’t have to happen overnight.

No grinch storm this run. We can all exhale

image.thumb.png.b80c0d9f88d48e76ee223a7e8c01d899.png

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Let’s take it all out on the 23rd.

All kidding aside, that’s a high stakes pattern toward Xmas. Decent trends today of sinking that gradient south so maybe we can actually get a good winter threat near Xmas instead of flamingos and parrots flying overhead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

All kidding aside, that’s a high stakes pattern toward Xmas. Decent trends today of sinking that gradient south so maybe we can actually get a good winter threat near Xmas instead of flamingos and parrots flying overhead. 

Wilton?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...