Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,329
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

2025-2026 ENSO


Recommended Posts

the Pacific jet is going to retract and shift equatorward after its poleward extension next week, which should lead to the -EPO that we're waiting for. I have pretty high confidence in this -EPO developing; the progression makes sense. BN to much BN temps in the East would follow into early Dec

trough near Japan/HI are also old-school signs of a favorable Pacific pattern

792136291_eps_uv250_npac_fh240-360(1).thumb.gif.bd50d08dbaeadf732dd38220f25673d6.gif151794181_eps_z500a_nhem_fh240-360(2).thumb.gif.2afbd364b1a76da6e6f6c00442c7165b.gif

  • Like 5
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

the Pacific jet is going to retract and shift equatorward after its poleward extension next week, which should lead to the -EPO that we're waiting for. I have pretty high confidence in this -EPO developing; the progression makes sense. BN to much BN temps in the East would follow into early Dec

trough near Japan/HI are also old-school signs of a favorable Pacific pattern

792136291_eps_uv250_npac_fh240-360(1).thumb.gif.bd50d08dbaeadf732dd38220f25673d6.gif151794181_eps_z500a_nhem_fh240-360(2).thumb.gif.2afbd364b1a76da6e6f6c00442c7165b.gif

Sharp rise in momentum starting to percolate into the circulation. Good stuff. 

MR-latest-365days.thumb.png.8bddec7cbbbcfdc8e0f9acece852bc68.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

For Washington, DC to New York City, a PNA+ is far more common for days with 6" or more snowfall except during the second half of February and afterward when the wave lengths shorten. New York City statistics since 1950:

image.png.fee0c1c0391a19269afc6d6b2ac5310a.png

For January, when wave lengths are at their longest, a PNA+ was present for 92.5% of days with 6" or more snowfall in New York City.

For Boston, the PNA+ plays a smaller role.

Yup PNA is king south of New England. NYC's not reaching 4" for December if that western trough hangs out for the entirety of the month. That pretty much guarantees a BN winter for us. Forgot who said it but 19" is likely a (generous) upper bound for our snow totals this winter. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

February 2006 wasn't all that bad. At least we got a return to cold, and a snowstorm on the 11th-12th. I'd gladly sign up for that after the last 3 or 4 winters.

But please, no repeat of 1989-90, when spring pretty much began in January.

Feb 06 was a good month in CNJ, 20.5", 89/90 stunk, but teased us with a Nov snowstorm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

Here's the evolution of the CFSv2 forecast for December. It should be noted that all the timeframes, the CFSv2 is not yet in its high skill area.

image.thumb.png.7de5cc8e622955af2aeef344f9f22586.png

 

High skill is like the last 3 days, lol. But hey, it is not usually that bad with the end result. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, GaWx said:

Allan Huffman going with a cold January in the E US. I wonder if this is because of a prog for a very early SSWE followed by a lagged cold effect in Jan: I’d be more than happy with this. I’d love another cold Jan! Not having a warmer than normal La Niña winter in the majority of the SE including another cold Jan would be a victory!

IMG_5319.thumb.jpeg.87174633c168d28ce2e1403daae2cbd9.jpeg

This seems reasonable. I think this early December cold wave is mainly driven by high frequency signals, mainly the 7 phase MJO, but i think its too early for the SSW to be having any impact. Roundy thinks there will be some warmth in late December as the MJO move back towards 1 and 2 (abeit prolonged due to an easterly eq. Rossby wave continuing convection in region 7), but it seems like it may have a weaker signal at that point so influences from things like the SSW on top of the low-frequency state (troughy in the east) would lead so something like this. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, anthonymm said:

Yup PNA is king south of New England. NYC's not reaching 4" for December if that western trough hangs out for the entirety of the month. That pretty much guarantees a BN winter for us. Forgot who said it but 19" is likely a (generous) upper bound for our snow totals this winter. 

Pretty uncommon for short-range oscillations like the PNA to remain strongly in either state for a whole month. I wouldn't put too much weight on this negative flip, though it might explain the great lakes track that seems more likely during the latter half of nov. and perhaps during the first week of dec.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, anthonymm said:

Yup PNA is king south of New England. NYC's not reaching 4" for December if that western trough hangs out for the entirety of the month. That pretty much guarantees a BN winter for us. Forgot who said it but 19" is likely a (generous) upper bound for our snow totals this winter. 

If we can fire up some Miller Bs that don’t develop too late, NYC has a chance at 20”. There very likely won’t be Miller As during a Nina, and clippers as we’ve seen have largely died out. Maybe a lucky SWFE can tack on 4-6” like the one last winter. But that’s really NYC’s path to anything near normal in this regime. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kazimirkai said:

Warm waters into the W pac. from this westerly wind burst are priming the ENSO for a real shift come the next big event. 

Yeah, that will be interesting to watch evolve. Extended range EPS and GEFS are advertising this WWB to push out to the dateline. Which has proven difficult to do in other recent La Niña years. So I'm curious to see how this one goes as we move into December. 

gefs_u850_anom_hov_equatorial_79_17_ext_2025111100.thumb.png.c6c59eb98f4880f471d11ac9057a6060.png

ps2png-worker-commands-59875776cc-zxrr5-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-_1ik050e.png.352218d2eaafd223437c8b9db4458093.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

For Washington, DC to New York City, a PNA+ is far more common for days with 6" or more snowfall except during the second half of February and afterward when the wave lengths shorten. New York City statistics since 1950:

image.png.fee0c1c0391a19269afc6d6b2ac5310a.png

For January, when wave lengths are at their longest, a PNA+ was present for 92.5% of days with 6" or more snowfall in New York City.

For Boston, the PNA+ plays a smaller role.

 Great stuff, Don! Since I had seen similar results in looking at the following for RDU big snows, I figured you and others might find this interesting:

 

21 RDU 6”+ snowstorms since 1950 (Niña or -neutral ENSO bolded)

1/19/1955 Niña neut PNA, neut AO, moderate -NAO

12/11/1958 mod +PNA, neut AO and NAO

3/2-3/1960 mod -PNA, neut AO and NAO

3/9/1960 weak -PNA, strong -AO, neutral NAO

2/26/1963 -neutral strong +PNA, mod +AO, neutral NAO

1/26/1966 neut PNA, strong -AO and -NAO

2/9/1967 -neutral mod +PNA, weak +AO, moderate +NAO

3/1/1969 strong +PNA/-AO, moderate -NAO

1/7-8/1973 weak +PNA, neut AO, strong -NAO

2/18-9/1979 neut PNA/AO/NAO

3/1-2/1980 neut PNA/AO, moderate +NAO

3/24/1983 mod +PNA/-AO, neutral NAO

2/6/1984 -neutral mod +PNA/+AO, strong +NAO

1/7/1988 mod +PNA, neut AO, weak +NAO

2/17-8/1989 Niña neut PNA, strong +AO/+NAO

1/24-5/2000 Niña mod +PNA, neut AO, moderate -NAO

1/2-3/2002 -neutral strong +PNA, neut AO, moderate -NAO

2/26-7/2004 neut PNA, strong -AO, weak -NAO

12/26/2010 Niña weak -PNA, strong -AO, moderate -NAO

1/17/2018 Niña neut PNA, weak +AO, strong +NAO

12/9-10/2018 mod +PNA, neut AO, moderate +NAO
—————————

For the 21 storms

-11 (52%) +PNA, 7 (33%) neutral PNA, 3 (14%) -PNA

-7 (33%) +NAO, 6 (29%) neutral NAO, 8 (38%) -NAO

So, whereas 52% had a +PNA vs only 14% with a -PNA, 38% had a -NAO vs 33% with a +NAO

So, whereas there were almost 4 times as many with a +PNA vs a -PNA, -NAO vs +NAO has been much more balanced.
————

The above is for all ENSO.
What about for just -ENSO?

-5 (56%) +PNA, 3 (33%) neutral PNA, 1 (5%) -PNA

-4 (44%) +NAO, 1 (11%) neutral NAO, 4 (44%) -NAO

So, whereas 56% had a +PNA vs only 5% with a -PNA, 44% had a -NAO vs 44% with a +NAO

So, whereas there were 5 times as many with a +PNA vs a -PNA, -NAO vs +NAO has been totally balanced.
—————

I found similar results for Greensboro and Atlanta. Bottom line: in the SE US, a +PNA is a bigger driver of big snowstorms than is a -NAO.

Daily PNA link:



Daily NAO link:

 
————
*Edit: Interestingly, looking back at big storms at RDU and GSO, the last 5 (2014-18) were all with a moderate to strong +NAO! So, there hasn’t been even one 6”+ snow at either RDU or GSO with a -NAO (even a weak one) since way back on 12/26/2010! This could, of course, be from randomness. But I’m not sure about that considering what @bluewavehas said about -NAO ridges tending to hook up with SE ridges more often than in the past. Hmmmm….
 
Edit #2: I just noticed this for the 21 RDU big snowstorms for the AO:

5 +AO, 11 neutral AO, 5 -AO

So, neutral has been favored.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, anthonymm said:

Yup PNA is king south of New England. NYC's not reaching 4" for December if that western trough hangs out for the entirety of the month. That pretty much guarantees a BN winter for us. Forgot who said it but 19" is likely a (generous) upper bound for our snow totals this winter. 

Here's the data for December vs. January-April snowfall for New York City for La Niña winters 1979-80 through 2024-2025. 2024-2025 is officially listed as cold neutral. December 2024 had 2.8" of snow.

image.png.a11711558359183a4575adea371a12e0.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

Here's the evolution of the CFSv2 forecast for December. It should be noted that all the timeframes, the CFSv2 is not yet in its high skill area.

image.thumb.png.7de5cc8e622955af2aeef344f9f22586.png

Although I look at the Cfs2 for fun, I doubt it's reanalysis maps are correct!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, EasternLI said:

Yeah, that will be interesting to watch evolve. Extended range EPS and GEFS are advertising this WWB to push out to the dateline. Which has proven difficult to do in other recent La Niña years. So I'm curious to see how this one goes as we move into December. 

gefs_u850_anom_hov_equatorial_79_17_ext_2025111100.thumb.png.c6c59eb98f4880f471d11ac9057a6060.png

ps2png-worker-commands-59875776cc-zxrr5-6fe5cac1a363ec1525f54343b6cc9fd8-_1ik050e.png.352218d2eaafd223437c8b9db4458093.png

It’s blatantly obvious now that we are going to be transitioning into an El Niño in a big way this spring. I think once we get to March/April the transition really kicks into high gear and it’s going to be rapid….possibly very rapid. Would not surprise me if the ENSO region SSTs reach weak El Nino status by the end of May

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

It’s blatantly obvious now that we are going to be transitioning into an El Niño in a big way this spring. I think once we get to March/April the transition really kicks into high gear and it’s going to be rapid….possibly very rapid. Would not surprise me if the ENSO region SSTs reach weak El Nino status by the end of May

Are you thinking we have a good chance to get a strong+ El Niño per RONI? If so, are you thinking a mainly mild result in the NE US?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, GaWx said:

Are you thinking we have a good chance to get a strong+ El Niño per RONI? If so, are you thinking a mainly mild result in the NE US?

 

20 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

what do you think the answer to those questions are

Haven’t even begun to think about it yet. But I do appreciate the vapid airhead commentary as always

  • Thanks 1
  • Crap 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

Here's the data for December vs. January-April snowfall for New York City for La Niña winters 1979-80 through 2024-2025. 2024-2025 is officially listed as cold neutral. December 2024 had 2.8" of snow.

image.png.a11711558359183a4575adea371a12e0.png

 

Incredible how reliable that December snowfall statistic is in the park.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

 

Haven’t even begun to think about it yet. But I do appreciate the vapid airhead commentary as always

IMG_5320.jpeg.6c13d00b11ae20189a45bd7c3116dd6f.jpeg

 
 He’s just trying to be funny. It’s good to laugh at yourself. I do that all of the time! I’m my own best comedian when I laugh at myself as I have so much material! Geez, all I have to do is to look in a mirror. Come on, man, we all know that you enjoy pushing mildness in winter when you can back it up well (which to your credit you do), and that there are more that do the same on the opposite end sometimes without good evidence.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, GaWx said:

IMG_5320.jpeg.6c13d00b11ae20189a45bd7c3116dd6f.jpeg

 
 He’s just trying to be funny. It’s good to laugh at yourself. I do that all of the time! I’m my own best comedian when I laugh at myself as I have so much material! Come on, man, we all know that you enjoy pushing mildness in winter when you can back it up well (which to your credit you do), and that there are more that do the same on the opposite end sometimes without good evidence.

Yeah I mean I'm a snow miser like a lot of folks here. I want snow and plenty of it! Why he won't simply admit to being a heat miser when it's so blatantly obvious is beyond me--all our biases are loud and clear :D

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Yeah I mean I'm a snow miser like a lot of folks here. I want snow and plenty of it! Why he won't simply admit to being a heat miser when it's so blatantly obvious is beyond me--all our biases are loud and clear :D

Thanks. But to his credit, he backs it up well! Some on the other side don’t back it up as well. As far as myself, I clearly prefer cold and root for it. However, I do my best to post as objectively as possible and not let my preferences affect my posts. So, whereas I enjoy posting about cold, if I see a model that looks warm I won’t be afraid to post it to protect my objectivity. I post whatever I see, cold, warm, neither, etc.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Wow indeed 82 percent now!!! This is from Allan Huffman on Twitter he says:
 
Today's 12z op ECMWF and EPS mean both show the 10mb U wind turning negative, meaning a change to an easterly wind direction over the polar regions and an #SSWE with 41 of 50 EPS members (82%) showing this reversal with 11/25 the day with the most negative members. Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, can weaken the tropospheric polar vortex, allowing for increased high latitude blocking (-AO) and the enhanced risk for arctic air discharge into the mid-latitudes (North America, Europe, East Asia). A late November SSWE is relatively rare, and COULD help favor a cold start to meteorological winter(December). The last November SSWE was in 1968.
 
 
Graph titled 12z OP ECMWF and EPS mean U wind at 10mb displays multiple colored line ensembles curving from positive to negative values over time axis labeled Day with x-axis spanning approximately -10 to 30 days and y-axis showing wind speeds from 20 to -20 meters per second indicating wind direction reversal.
 
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

Weeklies are still cold and active in the central and east.

 

The latest PV is most likely at its weakest stage yet. 

I just saw it. Right you are and by a good margin!! Mean minimum down to ~0:

IMG_5321.png.379c9cccd84975b6b7e08704f60f7f73.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snowman19 said:

 

Haven’t even begun to think about it yet. But I do appreciate the vapid airhead commentary as always

You know your shit and bring a lot to the table in terms of ENSO discussions but dude….. watch it. I don’t like that you are post limited because you actually know what you are talking about, but maybe if you actually tried not being a raging d*ckhead for once in your fucking life things would be better for you here. You are 100% right about misinfo/wishcasters like JB. You aren’t going to actually win in your crusade against these people by being insufferable, you need actual people skills. You want to just call me an idiot and ignore this? Fine, go ahead. I can’t stop you from doing that, I said what needed to be said. Now it’s up to you to decide what you want to do.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, snowman19 said:

 

Haven’t even begun to think about it yet. But I do appreciate the vapid airhead commentary as always

You’d think getting another mod strong one isn’t too likely.  That would make 3 of the last 4 with only 18-19 not being strong or mod 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...