Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,149
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

2025 Atlantic Hurricane Season


BarryStantonGBP
 Share

Recommended Posts

Some of the accounts on weather platforms are getting too caviler and cocky in their eyerolls about the GFS. We are in August during what should be a favorable MJO phase and *unlike last year* models show a ton of activity in the coming weeks. The fact that model runs from the GFS to the EURO have shown significant hurricanes after mid August is very troublesome, especially since they have been consistent.

Be ready, it is on the way.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Floydbuster said:

Some of the accounts on weather platforms are getting too caviler and cocky in their eyerolls about the GFS. We are in August during what should be a favorable MJO phase and *unlike last year* models show a ton of activity in the coming weeks. The fact that model runs from the GFS to the EURO have shown significant hurricanes after mid August is very troublesome, especially since they have been consistent.

Be ready, it is on the way.

I mean, the switch flipped somewhat early this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Floydbuster said:

Some of the accounts on weather platforms are getting too caviler and cocky in their eyerolls about the GFS. We are in August during what should be a favorable MJO phase and *unlike last year* models show a ton of activity in the coming weeks. The fact that model runs from the GFS to the EURO have shown significant hurricanes after mid August is very troublesome, especially since they have been consistent.

Be ready, it is on the way.

Dude. The GFS showed us 40 inch blizzards all winter and now its showing us massive hurricanes hitting everywhere all at once. Someone has to be messing with it. I trust the JMA more than the 384 hour GFS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TriPol said:

Dude. The GFS showed us 40 inch blizzards all winter and now its showing us massive hurricanes hitting everywhere all at once. Someone has to be messing with it. I trust the JMA more than the 384 hour GFS.

They're not saying that we're going to get massive hurricanes just that the models are showing an active signal coming up which usually means we'll see some storms form somewhere. The models showing so many consistently big hurricanes is a good sign we're about to enter an active period for a bit.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cptcatz said:

Euro hour 360, just saying that crazy GFS hour 384 image has model support...

ecmwf_mslp_pcpn_watl_fh360-360.gif

Hour 384 in regard to tropical development minus well be hour 1000+.  This scenario will change at least 10x before we even get to hour 200 let alone 384.  Interesting to look at but whether it is the 18z gfs or even this 0z Euro run for it to play out this way is unlikely.  The only thing that these model runs tell me is that there will be an uptick in activity and wait and see what happens over the next 3-5 days.   What I have noticed is that the models are pushing everything back 5-10 days which is also a typical caveat of modeling.  

What happened last year we were searching for 10 days out and hour 384 etc. and then we had storms like Hurricane Heleen blow up out of nowhere which could be the case this year.  

I would not watch 384 hours out but rather just make sure we are not missing something closer in time.

I think the next 3-4 days of model watching and looking at other things like the visible and water vapor maps will be useful tools to locate harmless little low level or mid-level swirls that become something bigger in time.

 

Mean time here in Kitty Hawk where I still am the strong gusty NE winds have begun again, and the beaches are once again closed to swimmers due to heavy surf and dangerous rip currents under 82-85 water temps.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TriPol said:

You know what? It’s 2025. Let’s do this. Let’s push FEMA and the NWS to their breaking points and see how that goes.

IMG_0259.jpeg

12 hours  later the GFS says wait till next  year.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevin Reilly said:

Hour 384 in regard to tropical development minus well be hour 1000+.  This scenario will change at least 10x before we even get to hour 200 let alone 384.  Interesting to look at but whether it is the 18z gfs or even this 0z Euro run for it to play out this way is unlikely.  The only thing that these model runs tell me is that there will be an uptick in activity and wait and see what happens over the next 3-5 days.   What I have noticed is that the models are pushing everything back 5-10 days which is also a typical caveat of modeling.  

What happened last year we were searching for 10 days out and hour 384 etc. and then we had storms like Hurricane Heleen blow up out of nowhere which could be the case this year.  

I would not watch 384 hours out but rather just make sure we are not missing something closer in time.

I think the next 3-4 days of model watching and looking at other things like the visible and water vapor maps will be useful tools to locate harmless little low level or mid-level swirls that become something bigger in time.

 

Mean time here in Kitty Hawk where I still am the strong gusty NE winds have begun again, and the beaches are once again closed to swimmers due to heavy surf and dangerous rip currents under 82-85 water temps.

This is 100% common sense to anyone who has been following the tropics the last 20 years. The globals after 120 hours should only be used as a tool to see where development potential exists. 
The first few waves will likely be sacrificial in moistening the MDR. As we head into late August it’s looking more likely we see at least a few long track MDR storms. They often recurve. Like you mentioned the real threat may come from last minute home grown development. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LongBeachSurfFreak said:

This is 100% common sense to anyone who has been following the tropics the last 20 years. The globals after 120 hours should only be used as a tool to see where development potential exists. 
The first few waves will likely be sacrificial in moistening the MDR. As we head into late August it’s looking more likely we see at least a few long track MDR storms. They often recurve. Like you mentioned the real threat may come from last minute home grown development. 

not all recurve irma for example at one point way out in the atlantic it was already north of the islands yet with a strong ridge pressing westward and south irma went wsw for a day or 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of talk nationally of what may constitute a recession indicator for our economy.

Looking around here, seeing some recession indicators for tropical weather comprehension, weather model fluency, and the understanding of the relationship between time and numerical weather prediction. Specifically 6 threads since Chantal, and only a 50mph fish storm in the subtropics to show for it. What are we doing here? I guess the inactive period truly was inactive, despite loud opposition.

Might be controversial, but I don’t care what’s over Chad right now.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Boston Bulldog said:

Lots of talk nationally of what may constitute a recession indicator for our economy.

Looking around here, seeing some recession indicators for tropical weather comprehension, weather model fluency, and the understanding of the relationship between time and numerical weather prediction. Specifically 6 threads since Chantal, and only a 50mph fish storm in the subtropics to show for it. What are we doing here? I guess the inactive period truly was inactive, despite loud opposition.

Might be controversial, but I don’t care what’s over Chad right now.

What’s over Chad right now does have down stream implications. If the Sahel were experiencing a drought it would likely lead to a below normal season. Since that’s not the case watching waves in their embriotic state offers a glimpse of activity down the road. Anything more then that, as in locking in 360 hours global runs is pure speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LongBeachSurfFreak said:

What’s over Chad right now does have down stream implications. If the Sahel were experiencing a drought it would likely lead to a below normal season. Since that’s not the case watching waves in their embriotic state offers a glimpse of activity down the road. Anything more than that, as in locking in 360 hours global runs is pure speculation.

Thanks for sharing, you reminded me of the Landsea paper on the Sahel Monsoon, great point!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Boston Bulldog said:

Lots of talk nationally of what may constitute a recession indicator for our economy.

Looking around here, seeing some recession indicators for tropical weather comprehension, weather model fluency, and the understanding of the relationship between time and numerical weather prediction. Specifically 6 threads since Chantal, and only a 50mph fish storm in the subtropics to show for it. What are we doing here? I guess the inactive period truly was inactive, despite loud opposition.

Might be controversial, but I don’t care what’s over Chad right now.

As you know, it used to be the case that we didn’t start threads unless there was an invest or area of interest near a coastline…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

As you know, it used to be the case that we didn’t start threads unless there was an invest or area of interest near a coastline…

 I think that’s a good guideline, but I feel there are exceptions. For example, due to good model support (most importantly including ensembles) for a strong western Atlantic hurricane from it, I feel that the thread for the AEW still in W Africa, despite it not yet being an invest and it not even being on the TWO, is already easily warranted. I just posted the rather ominous looking 6Z Euro ensemble for it. I see no problem with siphoning off posts about that to its own thread so as to allow this main thread to not be as cluttered. Also, should it end up being a storm, we’d then have posts from further back in time all in one thread to look back at to see how it evolved on the models early on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...