Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,509
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, HVSnowLover said:

 

Not terrible even for NYC but will have to come in like a wall like GFS is showing. if it's weak forget it. 

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=snku_acc-imp&rh=2024010512&fh=66&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=

You’re not going to accumulate in the concrete jungle at 35 degrees even in January. Central Park is a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

You’re not going to accumulate in the concrete jungle at 35 degrees even in January. Central Park is a different story.

 

It has 4 inches in the Bronx in like 3 hours. I'm sure it's wrong anyway but if you are lower then 35 with those rates at night it could pile up fast.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HVSnowLover said:

 

It has 5 inches in the Bronx in like 3 hours. I'm sure it's wrong anyway but if you are lower then 35 with those rates at night it could pile up fast.   

I don’t think I’ll even get 5” and I’m 15 miles inland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

I don’t think I’ll even get 5” and I’m 15 miles inland.

I certainly am not expecting anything close to 5 inches but I'm just saying if the precip came in as heavy as the gfs is depicting a front end thump is not out of the question even in parts of the 5 boroughs. If it's light it will be 35-36 and a mix or white rain but if heavy and with evap cooling 33-34 is plenty fine to accumulate at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HVSnowLover said:

I certainly am not expecting anything close to 5 inches but I'm just saying if the precip came in as heavy as the gfs is depicting a front end thump is not out of the question even in parts of the 5 boroughs. If it's light it will be 35-36 and a mix or white rain but if heavy 33-34 is plenty fine to accumulate at night.

Some places will likely overperform others underperform. Always the case

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Northof78 said:

Both GFS/NAM strong signal for front end thump of 2-4/3-6" with no CCB/wraparound which sounds reasonable. Should be a nice storm vs. last 2 years of nothing with some period of moderate/heavy snow. 

Front end almost always works out better near the coast than backend anyway. Backend is generally a myth unless you have an actual strong coastal. My expectations aren't high for this by any means but some of the posts are too simplistic imo saying no where in or near NYC has a chance of a decent event. It's all about intensity and timing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Distribution of Daily Snowfall Amounts by Minimum Temperature with Total Precipitation of 0.50" or More and Measurable Snowfall:

image.png.f588faa26d8d8c7d1c7df6f7f74ca9f1.png

Distribution of Event Average Snow-to-Liquid Ratios:

image.png.b4e8d1288a08ab60e2dd1cca74f68a0a.png

The mean event average snow-to-liquid ratio was 1.4 (standard deviation: 1.5). The lowest was near 0. The highest was 9.2.

This data was taken from the combined climate records for Bridgeport, Islip, New York City, Newark, and Philadelphia.

At present, it appears that Central Park's low temperature during the precipitation will likely be 34° or above. NAM and GFS MOS: 34°. NBE: 36° +/- 3°.

This historic data also argues for a low ratio and light accumulation of snow for New York City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The track is definitely a problem on the Canadian models. That's not a NYC benchmark track and theres a reason LI is in the 40s and pouring.

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gdps&p=prateptype-imp&rh=2024010512&fh=42&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=

 

Look at the difference in low placement on the GFS and the best dynamics going right over the city. Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see how people are saying track isn't part of the problem. 

https://www.pivotalweather.com/model.php?m=gfs&p=prateptype_cat-imp&rh=2024010512&fh=36&r=us_ne&dpdt=&mc=

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mikem81 said:

Also shows just how much of a difference there is climate wise between Boston and NYC

Boston the city is dealing with the same easterly wind problem we are. Waters there are a few degrees colder so they have some more wiggle room but if they’re 34-35 in snow, accums in the city will be much reduced. Once you’re in places 10 miles or so inland it’s probably the best spot to be in the whole storm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jm1220 said:

Boston the city is dealing with the same easterly wind problem we are. Waters there are a few degrees colder so they have some more wiggle room but if they’re 34-35 in snow, accums in the city will be much reduced. Once you’re in places 10 miles or so inland it’s probably the best spot to be in the whole storm. 

How come 10 miles west of Boston is so much bigger a difference in these storms than 10 miles north or west of NYC? Is it because of the latitude? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

Almost all rain for NYC on the 12z GFS. Maybe an hour or two of slop.

That's incorrect.  Plenty of snow "falling" - it's just not clear how much of it will accumulate with 34-35F surface temps; during the thump part, NYC looks to be below 32F (barely) for the whole column, which is good.  So verbatim there will be snow and if we can avoid a warm nose aloft (who knows?) I think a few inches (not the 4.3" on the 10:1 map below) is likely - as per the GFS, not a forecast.  

sn10_acc-imp.us_state_ne_s.png

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • wdrag changed the title to Two Mdt to high impact events NYC subforum; wknd Jan 6-7 Incl OBS, and mid week Jan 9-10 (incl OBS). Total water equiv by 00z/11 general 2", possibly 6" includes snow-ice mainly interior. RVR flood potential increases Jan 10 and beyond. Damaging wind.
  • Rjay unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...