Spring Banter Thread

[WeatherFeen2000]

5 minutes ago, JetsPens87 said:

Probably not what you're looking for but it'd honestly be hard to make that comparison because we couldn't take this situation and overlay it as a Miller A. Everything would play out differently and we probably could not even replicate the placement of mid and upper level features because those were a function of this setup and this setup alone.

Thank you, every storm is different. I appreciate it I'm a snow feen man can't get it out of my system! Weather in general but snowstorms are just life! If there's a place I would like to live it would be somewhere preferably that have 70-80 degree summers with no humidity and 300 inches of snow per year? Umm how's Valdez, AK? 

[JetsPens87]

1 minute ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Honestly the blizzard of 93 may have been the last Miller A to track west of Montauk abd east of Pennsylvania.  That track has more or less gone extinct.   That was the hardest part of answering the question to me.  We've seen that so rarely it's hard to know. 

Yea exactly it was a tough question for me to ponder, an interesting one nonetheless though. But like you said there simply isn't too much to go off of to compare to.

[WeatherFeen2000]

Maybe Marquette Michigan is a better choice. Almost 400 inches of snow per year and average summers only 3 days above 90, which is annoying I don't want no 80's but it's closer than Valdez.

im such a greedy snow feen. Lol take care fellas gotta eat dinner my wife is nagging!

[Stormlover74]

13 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Honestly the blizzard of 93 may have been the last Miller A to track west of Montauk abd east of Pennsylvania.  That track has more or less gone extinct.   That was the hardest part of answering the question to me.  We've seen that so rarely it's hard to know. 

Dec 92. It took 24 hours to move from eastern VA to off the Delaware coast

 

 

[Rtd208]

As much as I love winter and snow I am ready to put this winter behind us. Bring on spring/summer 2017, I hope it is a hot and humid with plenty of chances for heavy rain and severe weather.

[Dan76]

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-74/centery:41/zoom:10  not a nice day for them

[SnowGoose69]

Evidently the Euro didn't really forecast 15 inches in NYC.  I was just told by someone the snow maps there include sleet to a minor extent still and many forecasters either forgot that or didn't know.  The correction supposedly yielded only about 2-6 inches of snow 

[dmillz25]

The struggle of walking through 20" of snow. This is my nephew up in Peekskill

[CPcantmeasuresnow]

37 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Evidently the Euro didn't really forecast 15 inches in NYC.  I was just told by someone the snow maps there include sleet to a minor extent still and many forecasters either forgot that or didn't know.  The correction supposedly yielded only about 2-6 inches of snow 

And they measured 7.6 so it still got it wrong either way.

[RDRY]

40 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Evidently the Euro didn't really forecast 15 inches in NYC.  I was just told by someone the snow maps there include sleet to a minor extent still and many forecasters either forgot that or didn't know.  The correction supposedly yielded only about 2-6 inches of snow 

Seems like a pretty big deal if true. This storm highlighted the issue of looking at surface precip panels on most of the models. Many of them matched almost exactly the non-dual pol radar returns (the Weather Channel app showed snow over Queens for hours when it was all sleet). There was also a previous minor coastal a couple years back when the models' precip panels exactly matched the actual storm. They showed light snow through the city northward by about 30 miles. They printed out about 4 inches, but dry air kept it flurries. Still much work to do to get these models to more accurately read the atmosphere.

I know that this is why we have pros - to extrapolate and not just regurgitate model output. But certain situations - like this one - are almost impossible, with the models contradicting each other right to the end.

[SnowBlitzkrieg]

54 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

Evidently the Euro didn't really forecast 15 inches in NYC.  I was just told by someone the snow maps there include sleet to a minor extent still and many forecasters either forgot that or didn't know.  The correction supposedly yielded only about 2-6 inches of snow

are you talking about the 12z run yesterday? I pointed this out in the storm thread at the time, the Kuchera map was only showing about 2-6" but I was shut down and told it was wrong and that the 10:1 maps that showed 13-15 were more accurate.

[Enigma]

The RGEM has a product that breaks down amounts by snow, sleet/ice pellets, and rain. I recall seeing it several times for this system and I know we used to post it often. I will say it again, SREF's were spot on for two days. Many folks use the plumes. I only use the snow % as it does a great job with thermals. 

[EasternLI]

One eye open for the weekend?

[bluewave]

Here's the scoop on the Euro P-types. I noticed sleet in the Euro soundings a day before the storm. But the further west track sped up the changeover to sleet cutting down snow amounts.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanMaue/status/841831646886301696/photo/1

ECMWF model has more p-types than the NCEP GFS or WRFs. Freezing rain, Ice Pellets (sleet), snow + wet snow, Rain, Mix or sloppic.twitter.com/ZaWrV82Erx

However, as it now appears, snowfall variable that is included in ECMWF variable lineup does NOT discriminate b/t snow, mixed, and sleet.

[ag3]

9 hours ago, RDRY said:

Seems like a pretty big deal if true. This storm highlighted the issue of looking at surface precip panels on most of the models. Many of them matched almost exactly the non-dual pol radar returns (the Weather Channel app showed snow over Queens for hours when it was all sleet). There was also a previous minor coastal a couple years back when the models' precip panels exactly matched the actual storm. They showed light snow through the city northward by about 30 miles. They printed out about 4 inches, but dry air kept it flurries. Still much work to do to get these models to more accurately read the atmosphere.

I know that this is why we have pros - to extrapolate and not just regurgitate model output. But certain situations - like this one - are almost impossible, with the models contradicting each other right to the end.

I had 5" of pure snow in Whitestone and then 2.5" of snow/sleet. Only went to pure sleet briefly. There were small flakes mixed in almost the entire time when it was mixing.

[Brasiluvsnow]

2 hours ago, EasternLI said:

One eye open for the weekend?

was wondering this myself ?

[RDRY]

1 hour ago, ag3 said:

I had 5" of pure snow in Whitestone and then 2.5" of snow/sleet. Only went to pure sleet briefly. There were small flakes mixed in almost the entire time when it was mixing.

Virtually all sleet in Maspeth from 6:50 AM onward - just some occasional giant flakes mixed in.

[jm1220]

11 hours ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

And they measured 7.6 so it still got it wrong either way.

The 7.6 included tons of sleet. Sleet is measured the same way as snow. 

[bluewave]

12 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

The 7.6 included tons of sleet. Sleet is measured the same way as snow. 

This storm was one of the few in recent times which was just like what we used to see in the 70's through the 90's. Mixing gets to Long Beach and the South Shore a few hours early and the snowfall jackpot was interior instead of coast.

[jm1220]

19 minutes ago, bluewave said:

This storm was one of the few in recent times which was just like what we used to see in the 70's through the 90's. Mixing gets to Long Beach and the South Shore a few hours early and the snowfall jackpot was interior instead of coast.

Just between home and where I work in Queens it's clear there was a lot more here. The roads at home are clear while many up here are still snow packed. No liquid here while more than half the storm was rain at home. 

We were definitely overdue for a storm like this. It wasn't fun down on the coast but nothing you can do. Luckily the flooding didn't reach me like other parts of town. 

[bluewave]

2 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

Just between home and where I work in Queens it's clear there was a lot more here. The roads at home are clear while many up here are still snow packed. No liquid here while more than half the storm was rain at home. 

We were definitely overdue for a storm like this. It wasn't fun down on the coast but nothing you can do. Luckily the flooding didn't reach me like other parts of town. 

It looks like the massive Army Corps beach rebuilding project will begin this spring from what I have been hearing. There are going to be plenty of trucks hauling boulders in to rebuild the jetties. It will be interesting to watch the progress of the project the next few years.

[JerseyWx]

For being inland, I got a heck of a lot more sleet than expected.  There were times where it came down with the heavy snow, and at points it was the only thing falling.

[North and West of Town]

Not sure if I mentioned this yesterday, but this was kind of a throwback storm for me, reminding me of early 1990s storms from when I was a kid: major snows inland, mixing near me. The one difference was that it had some February 2014 feel to it in that we got a lot of SN+ followed by sleet. We haven't had wind driven sleet like we did yesterday in a while. Finished around a foot or so in MMU with lots of blowing and drifting. Crazy for mid-March.

 

Anyway, I'm ready to work on the yard and get back outside.

[gymengineer]

15 hours ago, FreeRain said:

 

WEATHER SERVICE DECIDED LAST MINUTE NOT TO CUT SNOW FORECAST

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SCI_WINTER_WEATHER_FORECAST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-03-14-17-17-34

I posted about this in the Mid-Atlantic forum. Kind of surprised there's not more discussion about this in this sub-forum. 

[jm1220]

5 hours ago, EasternLI said:

One eye open for the weekend?

The trough is going to have to dig more for a redevelopment to occur far enough south. Looks now like a SNE special other than whatever snow we can get from initial overrunning.

[Dark Star]

15 hours ago, FreeRain said:

 

WEATHER SERVICE DECIDED LAST MINUTE NOT TO CUT SNOW FORECAST

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SCI_WINTER_WEATHER_FORECAST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-03-14-17-17-34

Thanks for the link.  Always grinds my gears when Forecasters cannot admit they were wrong.  I've been wrong too often, although by Monday at 3 PM I knew some sleet was going to mix in, I just didn't know how much.  I live in Garwood and I never bothered measuring, although we couldn't have gotten any more than 6".  Not sure how a trained spotter in Elizabeth reported 9".

[Stormlover74]

16 minutes ago, Dark Star said:

Thanks for the link.  Always grinds my gears when Forecasters cannot admit they were wrong.  I've been wrong too often, although by Monday at 3 PM I knew some sleet was going to mix in, I just didn't know how much.  I live in Garwood and I never bothered measuring, although we couldn't have gotten any more than 6".  Not sure how a trained spotter in Elizabeth reported 9".

Looks like a general 6 to 8 around the area so its not outlandish but a bit high. Not sure how Irvington got 15

[JerseyWx]

9 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

Looks like a general 6 to 8 around the area so its not outlandish but a bit high. Not sure how Irvington got 15

I don't think they did honestly.  Not even close to 15 up here.  West Milford only got 15.8"

[Stormlover74]

Just now, JerseyWx said:

I don't think they did honestly.  Not even close to 15 up here.

Western parts of Essex, up near Eagle Rock got 10-13 which is believable but not 15 that far east and at lower elevation esp with the airport getting half that

[JerseyWx]

5 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

Western parts of Essex, up near Eagle Rock got 10-13 which is believable but not 15 that far east and at lower elevation esp with the airport getting half that

Yeah I noticed the other amounts in Essex seemed fine.  Irvington is pretty urban though and I just don't see how they could have got so much.  Probably a drift lol.