Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,515
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    amirah5
    Newest Member
    amirah5
    Joined

Thursday Thumper or Thirst-Quencher


moneypitmike

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, ORH_wxman said:

Super bomb (like 14 mb in 6 hours) with almost the same exact track. Lol. What a weenie model that is sometimes. 

It definitely has rapid intensification potential given those dynamics and warm waters offshore of the islands. But let's see what the big boy models do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

It definitely has rapid intensification potential given those dynamics and warm waters offshore of the islands. But let's see what the big boy models do.

Yeah. The fact the euro hints at it anyway has me interested. 

There's definitely some room for 6 hours of crazy if it works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, moneypitmike said:

I'm hoping for ratios to compensate for lower qpf.  :)

We've got another day of model runs before locking bulls-eyes into place.  I'd take 6-8" of fluffier over 8-10+" of paste since we already have the base.  Let ORH Co east have the higher qpf if we can lock a few degrees colder and get a powder bomb.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

We've got another day of model runs before locking bulls-eyes into place.  I'd take 6-8" of fluffier over 8-10+" of paste since we already have the base.  Let ORH Co east have the higher qpf if we can lock a few degrees colder and get a powder bomb.  

I prefer the 7-10:1 paste to increase the base for reasons some don't understand.................;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that NAM solution is really bombogen - though unusual for it's tightness of scale.  the problem is there's unusually intense hydrostatic exertion because ... heh, as much as I've been complaining about the gradient, the surplus is actually causing a freakshow UVM max there.   120+ kt jet max is rather extreme for 500 mbs.  fascinating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bostonseminole said:

interesting track, just a bit east would be better.. 974mb east of marblehead ...

You'd still get crushed on that evolution. But yeah, optimal for you would be about 20-25 miles east. 

We will see what euro says later. I'm actually not as interested in gfs this storm since it is probably the type of storm the gfs would struggle the most with. It's possible this could be a "non-hydrostatic model special"...though let's wait another cycle before getting too caught up in that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dryslot said:

I prefer the 7-10:1 paste to increase the base for reasons some don't understand.................;)

Oh' I totally understand, I just don't like clearing it.  6-10" fluff = 1 hour clearing, 6-10" paste = 2+ hours clearing.

Clip on the downhill sticks and 6" powder is way more fun than 6" paste.  Friday will be a Berkshire East Day me thinks.

:ski:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

You'd still get crushed on that evolution. But yeah, optimal for you would be about 20-25 miles east. 

We will see what euro says later. I'm actually not as interested in gfs this storm since it is probably the type of storm the gfs would struggle the most with. It's possible this could be a "non-hydrostatic model special"...though let's wait another cycle before getting too caught up in that. 

haha funny you mentioned that ...i was just commenting on that look.  wow ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...