TalcottWx Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Rgem deets plz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 wow onA chance of snow showers. Cloudy, with a high near 29. South wind around 7 mph. Chance of precipitation is 30%. Total daytime snow accumulation of less than a half inch possible. TonightSnow, mainly after 9pm. Low around 23. South wind 5 to 7 mph becoming calm in the evening. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 1 to 3 inches possible. SundaySnow. High near 23. Northeast wind 5 to 7 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 1 to 3 inches possible. Sunday NightSnow. Low around 16. North wind around 9 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. New snow accumulation of 3 to 7 inches possible. MondaySnow. High near 23. Northeast wind around 11 mph. Chance of precipitation is 100%. Monday NightSnow, mainly before 3am. Low around 16. Chance of precipitation is 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 we can only hope! http://www.weather.gov/images/box/winter/SnowAmt90Prcntl.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Rgem deets plz Get a bigger snow plow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TauntonBlizzard2013 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 This certainly works for me. Much higher than I would have gone.... But I'll certainly take 14-18. Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Ginxy's chartreuse is tickling my house Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Just continuous snow for bos on rgem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 7, 2015 Author Share Posted February 7, 2015 Rgem wagons south!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Ginxy's chartreuse is tickling my houseinappropriate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 RGEM is locked in right now. Consistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Rgem wagons south!!didnt someone just post the max was the New Hampshire border? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Rgem wagons south!!you probably didn't even look at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Rgem showing all other mesoscale guidance how it's done, with consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 RGEM thermal fields definitely ticked south. And the next batch of overrunning looked like it ticked south as well. Edit: Only thing is that it cut back on the north and south side, so it's just narrowing the band of highest QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 RGEM is locked in right now. Consistent. Congrats on the NAM, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 you probably didn't even look at it. I'm not sure he ever really looks at models unless they are on twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 This system now has huge bust potential with those inflated snow totals. If it happens ... awesome, and we'll peer back at the data in hindsight and it will be all fun to pick it apart and put it back to together...etc. But it's easier to fail 18" than it is to achieve that... much less 24", both of which strain climatology. Try really hard to come down out of the psychotropic head rush that's fevered the forum since last night, and think about this in a conservative approach. Those snow totals ...gosh, just estimating they must be on the order of +3 SD, and would be the third time inside of 2-weeks at that! I guess to be honest, that ending statement means less to me. Usually when I hear others defend a position with that sort of reasoning, I immediately think, "...Until it happens; you can't limit the possibility just because it hasn't happened before in a previous sample set..." There were some spectacular winters in the 1800's... 1717, wasn't that the year of the big snow and the 5' snow pack? I also saw a 15' snow pack in interior NS in photographs taken as recently as 2001 or so. Maybe this is one of those years. Just not sure this is one of those storms... The trough is weak... The low deepens but swings wide right on all the guidance I have seen. All we have is overrunning, super-imposed on some OE enhancement. Perhaps those two collocated events will push totals up; and of course, LE does huge totals too, so borrowing from other knowledge/experiences ... I'm not sure I see objectively why 12-18" occurs all the way up Rt 2 west of 495. I dunno, I'm preparing for the under at this point, and will be pleasantly surprised if more materializes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Congrats on the NAM, lol. hires_t_precip_neng_19.png nice subsidence zone over this area lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Tippy tippy tippy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 7, 2015 Author Share Posted February 7, 2015 you probably didn't even look at it.I did and it's less up north and more from here to nh border Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 RGEM thermal fields definitely ticked south. And the next batch of overrunning looked like it ticked south as well. Edit: Only thing is that it cut back on the north and south side, so it's just narrowing the band of highest QPF. The op euro did that as well. Qpf axis narrowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I can"t believe this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Putting comments on output to rest... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Congrats on the NAM, lol. hires_t_precip_neng_19.png Would be nice but tossed. This is looking more and more meso enhancement dependent. High terrain and CF areas will do well. There's just not enough synoptic forcing for my area. I'm leaning under the GYX totals...more like 8-10". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Putting comments on output to rest... image.jpg and still going I may add, unreal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Putting comments on output to rest... image.jpg Same here as Tolland. Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 nice subsidence zone over this area lol Huh? He lives in the CT River Valley on the VT/NH border or just north of that NE Mass meso band? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Would be nice but tossed. This is looking more and more meso enhancement dependent. High terrain and CF areas will do well. There's just not enough synoptic forcing for my area. I'm leaning under the GYX totals...more like 8-10". Mesos are picking up on terrain details down here too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastonSN+ Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 With the 3 to 5 inches expected on the CT coast we will reach our 30 inch yearly average. Great comeback winter. Let's hope we get another one down the road to get our 10th 40 plus winter from and including 2000/2001. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Putting comments on output to rest... image.jpg congrats mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.