vortex95 Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 14 hours ago, CoastalWx said: Wind will be less inland like usual, but it’s a multi-facet deal with heavy rain too. Possible coastal flooding as tides slowly get higher astronomically. How about those 12z ECMWF rainfall totals when all is said and done? 9.95" right over Weymouth! Would be among the best Nor'easters in Sep for the region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 15 hours ago, CoastalWx said: I said keep an eye on it in subsequent posts. No back-pedaling allowed! Your initial approach was, "ho-hunm, maybe we can get something" said in EEYORE tone, despite strong signals in the models. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago 14 hours ago, CoastalWx said: There’s enough ensemble members showing a decent hit unlike previous days. Still could jog east though so wouldn’t lock anything yet. If this was Jan, you'd be all in at this point! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 11 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said: I've liked the signal for a while now. Just wish it tapped a little more into tropical influence. The runs today seem to be a little more potent with perhaps some subtropical/hybrid potential, but we're obviously still a ways out. AI ensembles look more bullish but you can see a little signal there across guidance. For the weenies among us, to be clear, I'm not saying we're going to get crushed by tropical lol. Just that the general pattern seems open for one of these coastals bearing hybrid characteristics. As @vortex95 notes, that's a bit unusual for this time of year along the east coast with "hybrid" season usually being in October, but given the overarching hostility in the Atlantic basin this year it's not surprising that the east coast right now could only support some kind of sprawling mess. 12z ECMWF by 132 hr showing a strong warm seclusion unfolding (-6 C at 500 and +11 C at 700). I will get way ahead of myself and say this now, and an excuse to talk about past policy and events! The problem I see here is not whether it goes ST, it is the messaging. A strong non-tropical low then going ST and getting a name when it is sitting close to the coast? That is big problem for messaging b/c non-tropical wind warnings would have to be changed to tropical wind warnings! I do not know of any case like this this close to the coast, but similar things have happened. The Perfect Storm in Oct 1991. Once it deeply occluded, it drifted S of the Gulf Stream and become a hurricane, but they did not call it such operationally *even* thought they had a recon in it and found a 981 mb pressure and 88 kt FL winds! I found that disingenuous, as it was abundantly clear what it was, but NHC did not name it, and only included it in post-season analysis. The reasoning was they did not want to confuse the public, as the public may have thought the storm was a hurricane all along and cry foul. Such would never happen today b/c of the internet and social media. Back in those days if NHC could get away w/ not declaring a high latitude or out of season TC and defer it to post-season analyses, they would. But it has gone further. In Sep 1992, there was a small hurricane that quickly developed just N of TXKF, and it passed close to Sable Island when it was starting to weaken on sat, but they still recorded 55-60 kt winds. It was not even included in post-season analysis! In the TWO, it said, "moving towards cooler waters." That was "out phrase" for NHC not to declare something back then. Again, disingenuous and I find lazy. Just b/c something only exists for a short time, does not mean it does not exist! There are 5 suspect TCs in 1992 alone that will likely get included in HURDAT once the reanalysis project gets into to the 1990s (they plan to go to 2000). And for those wondering, the pre-Christmas 1994 storm ( the @CoastalWx “how did you know about that?” event) is a likely candidate for a 70 kt hurricane, peaking at 70 kt / 969 mb near 40/70. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 11 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said: Regardless of status, the models really do have persistently strong onshore flow for days over the region. As long as this doesn't trend 500nm east or turn into a pumpkin, someone along the coast may have some trouble. @CoastalWx must relent! And yes, it might just be a "COASTAL WX" sig impact event, but so was the Perfect Storm in 1991! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 7 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said: After years of boredom , we need and deserve something big . This would be nice hit as it moves NW to due west into NY state One thing about lows that hook or loop back to the NW, it jacks up the winds more as it pushes against the high to NW. One reason why the Oct 2021 event was NUTZ for WINDZZZZZZZZZZ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, vortex95 said: How about those 12z ECMWF rainfall totals when all is said and done? 9.95" right over Weymouth! Would be among the best Nor'easters in Sep for the region. Wow.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 4 hours ago, Cyclone-68 said: No lawn chair within a 100 miles should be safe from this 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vortex95 Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 4 hours ago, weatherwiz said: Wind fields are quite impressive and would be with such a storm so definitely need to keep an eye on given the trees are fully leaved still. And there full LEAVES on the TREES! One thing @CoastalWxneeds to account for here for the winds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago .19" on the day here....so spitting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago We don’t look at the GFS, but it’s a damn good hit. AI twin is west too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Euro deluge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago .17 so at least something last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Both euros are pretty bad for the coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 2 hours ago Author Share Posted 2 hours ago 6 hours ago, vortex95 said: One thing about lows that hook or loop back to the NW, it jacks up the winds more as it pushes against the high to NW. One reason why the Oct 2021 event was NUTZ for WINDZZZZZZZZZZ! Great news! Please jack up Seems like 50-70 mph for a good chunk of the region 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 58 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Great news! Please jack up Seems like 50-70 mph for a good chunk of the region 90-100 mph for the higher elevations of connecticut? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, vortex95 said: 12z ECMWF by 132 hr showing a strong warm seclusion unfolding (-6 C at 500 and +11 C at 700). I will get way ahead of myself and say this now, and an excuse to talk about past policy and events! The problem I see here is not whether it goes ST, it is the messaging. A strong non-tropical low then going ST and getting a name when it is sitting close to the coast? That is big problem for messaging b/c non-tropical wind warnings would have to be changed to tropical wind warnings! I do not know of any case like this this close to the coast, but similar things have happened. The Perfect Storm in Oct 1991. Once it deeply occluded, it drifted S of the Gulf Stream and become a hurricane, but they did not call it such operationally *even* thought they had a recon in it and found a 981 mb pressure and 88 kt FL winds! I found that disingenuous, as it was abundantly clear what it was, but NHC did not name it, and only included it in post-season analysis. The reasoning was they did not want to confuse the public, as the public may have thought the storm was a hurricane all along and cry foul. Such would never happen today b/c of the internet and social media. Back in those days if NHC could get away w/ not declaring a high latitude or out of season TC and defer it to post-season analyses, they would. But it has gone further. In Sep 1992, there was a small hurricane that quickly developed just N of TXKF, and it passed close to Sable Island when it was starting to weaken on sat, but they still recorded 55-60 kt winds. It was not even included in post-season analysis! In the TWO, it said, "moving towards cooler waters." That was "out phrase" for NHC not to declare something back then. Again, disingenuous and I find lazy. Just b/c something only exists for a short time, does not mean it does not exist! There are 5 suspect TCs in 1992 alone that will likely get included in HURDAT once the reanalysis project gets into to the 1990s (they plan to go to 2000). And for those wondering, the pre-Christmas 1994 storm ( the @CoastalWx “how did you know about that?” event) is a likely candidate for a 70 kt hurricane, peaking at 70 kt / 969 mb near 40/70. Naming storms it s a boon to the industry as property deductibles are much, much higher for a named storm than for a non-named storm. #followthemoney 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Gfs wants nothing to do with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Just now, SnoSki14 said: Gfs wants nothing to do with it 1 run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago The GFS is so bad. Look what it does in one run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 53 minutes ago Share Posted 53 minutes ago 2 hours ago, CoastalWx said: .17 so at least something mast night I had .19" yesterday and .04" early this AM for a .23" total. I didn't expect that much additional after midnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 45 minutes ago Share Posted 45 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I had .19" yesterday and .04" early this AM for a .23" total. I didn't expect that much additional after midnight. Let’s hope the most boring stretch of our lives is coming to an abrupt end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 45 minutes ago Share Posted 45 minutes ago 26 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: The GFS is so bad. Look what it does in one run. Unless it's right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 44 minutes ago Share Posted 44 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said: Unless it's right? I think he means "bad" in relation to run-run consistency... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 42 minutes ago Share Posted 42 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Let’s hope the most boring stretch of our lives is coming to an abrupt end. I checked right out on local weather once the blizzard finished and pulled out of my rear last February...knew there was nothing to see for months and months- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 39 minutes ago Share Posted 39 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: Unless it's right? I don’t even look at it. It’s been an embarrassiment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 38 minutes ago Share Posted 38 minutes ago 6z euro AI went a little east and then swung west from ACK to BID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 34 minutes ago Share Posted 34 minutes ago Obviously some disagreement which is expected with such an anomalous setup. Would love for this to strengthen over Gulf Stream and swing west, south of SNE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 33 minutes ago Share Posted 33 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: 6z euro AI went a little east and then swung west from ACK to BID. I always want to see coastals get going early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 32 minutes ago Share Posted 32 minutes ago Min 46.4° 0.62” Nice rain event with sheet -RADZ most of the day and evening. Keep the rain coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now