Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM Just now, powderfreak said: How far would you toss the extended HRRR if this were winter? RRFS and HRRR both say ease way back on widespread massive totals , flood watches etc. . Not saying either are correct , but the convection to the south concerns are real . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ineedsnow Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM 12k NAM gone wild over Mt Tolland 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 02:31 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:31 PM 4 minutes ago, powderfreak said: How far would you toss the extended HRRR if this were winter? I’d be very worried , but I’d pretend that I wasn’t on here 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted yesterday at 03:07 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:07 PM Congrats Brett on whining to a 3K NAM Jack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 03:26 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:26 PM Yup, the big totals are gonna fluctuate here and there…but a very good soaking looks likely for a good chunk of SNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 03:27 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:27 PM Just now, WinterWolf said: Yup, the big totals are gonna fluctuate here and there…but a very good soaking looks likely for a good chunk of SNE. South even worse. Yikes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted yesterday at 03:32 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:32 PM 4 minutes ago, kdxken said: South even worse. Yikes. When Ryan speaks....I listen. Uh oh! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone-68 Posted yesterday at 03:33 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:33 PM That’s an impressive amount of rain in summer especially for a non tropical system 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
powderfreak Posted yesterday at 03:33 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:33 PM 58 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: I’d be very worried , but I’d pretend that I wasn’t on here That’s a very honest answer, ha. I feel that. These events are always going to have surprises when convection is involved. My one pause is always the consistent bullseye for days… nothing is ever that consistent this time of year. There’s always the haves and have nots… one town gets 0.92” in three rounds of 0.30” rain. While another town does 3.28” not far away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeCTWX Posted yesterday at 03:39 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:39 PM Yaaaa I’m not liking the look of this. I better go clean out my gutters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanStWx Posted yesterday at 03:42 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:42 PM 8 hours ago, vortex95 said: Last evening, a PDS SVR was issued for Block Island. However, the warning stated 60 mph gusts. That is not PDS level (74 mph I believe is). Any insights? It is either I issued originally with 70 mph and updated to 60 mph with a SVS and it never got rid of the original language, or I had also clicked the button for "this storm is producing widespread wind damage..." and it triggered that language. Either way, the extremely dangerous situation is more for the observed nature of severe weather. PDSs are used for watches, emergencies are the tornado/severe thunderstorm related warnings. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JACKASS Posted yesterday at 03:45 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:45 PM 16 minutes ago, kdxken said: South even worse. Yikes. Be happy this didn’t happen 3 days earlier! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted yesterday at 03:49 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:49 PM What a day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted yesterday at 03:51 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:51 PM Hopefully everyone is surviving all of that Canadian and fireworks smoke. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted yesterday at 03:56 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:56 PM 3 minutes ago, dendrite said: Hopefully everyone is surviving all of that Canadian and fireworks smoke. Last night, the wealthy folks with houses on New Silver Beach had themselves a fire a fireworks competition. The lingering smoke inversion must’ve lasted 30 minutes. I was telling my wife, between the three families setting them off, they must’ve spent a combine $20,000 on fireworks. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeCTWX Posted yesterday at 03:58 PM Share Posted yesterday at 03:58 PM At least this should put an end to any drought talks in Connecticut lol 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FXWX Posted yesterday at 04:02 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:02 PM 3 minutes ago, OrangeCTWX said: At least this should put an end to any drought talks in Connecticut lol No way! Drought all the time... Lol. There will be folks complaining by Thursday!!! 1 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted yesterday at 04:06 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:06 PM Yeah this should knock CT down from D2 to D1. D1 usually corresponds to water pouring out of hillsides here. 6” of water in the basement is D0. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 04:07 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:07 PM Just ignore the dry guidance and go with the 2-9” guidance lol. If CT gets an inch or two that does nada for the drought 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM idk...I would you would want to see more convective processes involved when talking about potential for these widespread excessive totals some of the short-term models are indicating. I can see 1-3" widespread and then probably a narrow zone where you get maybe 4-5" but that may be more isolated versus widespread. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted yesterday at 04:14 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:14 PM 6 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Just ignore the dry guidance and go with the 2-9” guidance lol. If CT gets an inch or two that does nada for the drought Well, Greenfield could get shut out entirely, so that’s definitely gonna do nothing for the drought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 04:16 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:16 PM 25 minutes ago, dendrite said: Hopefully everyone is surviving all of that Canadian and fireworks smoke. It's making me cough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 04:17 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:17 PM 3 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said: Well, Greenfield could get shut out entirely, so that’s definitely gonna do nothing for the drought. Very true. Point being this could be anywhere from a boring, mundane 1” or less to as much as a couple inches in CT. Pretty sure there will not be flooding lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 04:17 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:17 PM 9 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: Just ignore the dry guidance and go with the 2-9” guidance lol. If CT gets an inch or two that does nada for the drought Drought??? How much below expected are you for the year? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdxken Posted yesterday at 04:23 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:23 PM Eff the SREF . Don't need the rain. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted yesterday at 04:30 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:30 PM The FF risk is wherever the warm front sets up. You aren’t getting 10” of deformation rain on 700 warm front. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM 2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: The FF risk is wherever the warm front sets up. You aren’t getting 10” of deformation rain on 700 warm front. The warm front may not even get into SNE at all. Very possible it sets up to where coastal CT across coastal RI and far SE MA get the highest totals (anything greater than 3-4"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted yesterday at 04:35 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:35 PM 3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: The FF risk is wherever the warm front sets up. You aren’t getting 10” of deformation rain on 700 warm front. You’re good at sniffing these types of events out. Now that you’ve sobered up and they pulled from the bottom of Winni in time.. what do you think ? Widespread , narrow zone , most likely areas etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted yesterday at 04:37 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:37 PM We got between 1-2” last night. So we aren’t all that dry here currently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted yesterday at 04:40 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:40 PM 5 hours ago, CT Rain said: Lol you really dug to find that one. Friend Kris sent this Just came southbound on Route 32 and I have never seen anything damage wise like I just saw. It looks like a tornado went through the entire stretch from the 32 connector all the way up to Connecticut College, powerlines down, trees down everywhere. Roads are blocked off in some places and meanwhile at my house there’s not even a leaf that fell off a tree lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now