Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,635
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

March Madness


 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

First go around with an intensity 2 for tornadoes (also have it for hail in Texas). Very curious to see how this changes or enhances public communication or if it just adds confusion. I wonder what @OceanStWx thoughts on this conditional intensity addition is. 

image.png.b757eabfeb4c571f6d4f8319ae51e774.png

Why would they not hash that whole Enhanced area?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Why would they not hash that whole Enhanced area?

I am still trying to gauge this new conditional intensity thing. But I am with you...seems odd the entire thing isn't filled in and what additional value does this have over the regular hatching? But I guess its to highlight what the "max intensity" may be. IDK...I feel like this is going to cause more uncertainty or even hype that isn't needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

I am still trying to gauge this new conditional intensity thing. But I am with you...seems odd the entire thing isn't filled in and what additional value does this have over the regular hatching? But I guess its to highlight what the "max intensity" may be. IDK...I feel like this is going to cause more uncertainty or even hype that isn't needed

So we are getting cute and hashing 90% of the area as increased tornado threat and the other 10% is supposed to be enhanced due to other reasons? Doesn’t really make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

So we are getting cute and hashing 90% of the area as increased tornado threat and the other 10% is supposed to be enhanced due to other reasons? Doesn’t really make sense.

If the intensity conditioning is just going to collocate with the overall probability then I don’t really see the point. That 2 area is basically painted right over the 10%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

So we are getting cute and hashing 90% of the area as increased tornado threat and the other 10% is supposed to be enhanced due to other reasons? Doesn’t really make sense.

That's how I kind of see it. So in that tornado probability that intensity 2 area is supposed to indicate if a tornado occurs, the reasonable max intensity is EF3 and the intensity 1 area is max intensity EF2. I think though this is supposed to help local forecasters and emergency management to better communication to the public but I don't see how this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

That's how I kind of see it. So in that tornado probability that intensity 2 area is supposed to indicate if a tornado occurs, the reasonable max intensity is EF3 and the intensity 1 area is max intensity EF2. I think though this is supposed to help local forecasters and emergency management to better communication to the public but I don't see how this helps.

I mean is it going to hurt skill scores and just shrink the enhanced area and say in this area we could see strong tornadoes? I like that part of the new products. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Nahhh... everyone lost 1/3 to 1/2 of their snow under 68 F and beating sun, yesterday.

Just because you can't yet see bare ground, doesn't mean warmth was defeated.  

Man, the filtration that goes on in here looks like reality rendering at times  <_<

Melting was less than I expected yesterday bc of the lew dews....no filtration, just a yardstick into the snow....still over a foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect this is a PR method though, developed out of a complex human equation containing lots and lots of complete dip-shit oblivion reasons. That is a large spectrum of Darwinisms that range from the higher thinking capacity of the mouth breathers, over to just general irresponsible apathy. 

Those hashing are not tapping our shoulders.  They're trying to save those non-suspecting lives and this method may "solve" that equation above - or attempts to. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I mean is it going to hurt skill scores and just shrink the enhanced area and say in this area we could see strong tornadoes? I like that part of the new products. 

I believe this does change the probabilities which designates the categories. For example, it looks like it will be more difficult now to get a high risk day which I think is a great idea because really if a high risk is issued...you want that to be held for days where widespread significant severe is going to happen. This may hopefully reduce more of the high risk "busts" we have seen. 

I am with you...I am definitely not bashing this either, just trying to understand it more. But with what you said I think makes sense and if that is the case and purpose I can understand it a bit better. 

I'm sure there is some literature on this, I've only read the little bit on the SPC site. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yesterday alone?

False...not where I am....I didn't lose 7".

"we" meaning in this area here

Aside, the post was about 'warm being defeated' ... some were using snow as the observational proxy in that, which was dumb and proves a filtration bias in the first place because it was warm yesterday. 

Frankly, I care less about the snow stuff anyway.  We did lose a substantial amount though.  It looks like half..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yesterday alone?

False...not where I am....I didn't lose 7".

Tw’s were still in the mid 40s. It’s softening up and getting more primed though.

Today will be a more efficient melter up here…warmer, higher dews, and less cirrus taint.

Put a stick on top of your pack and see how far it sinks through today.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

Tw’s were still in the mid 40s. It’s softening up and getting more primed though.

Today will be a more efficient melter up here…warmer, higher dews, and less cirrus taint.

Put a stick on top of your pack and see how far it sinks through today.

I agree, it will go faster today...yesterday the dews slowed it, which was my original point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

There’s so much cold not far  away in Canada. Right thru end of Morch that PV just sits up there and models show cold up there. I don’t think we are done yet. Suggest we enjoy today 

Not a zero percent chance for something to pop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...