Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,621
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

2/22-23 "There's no way..." Storm Part 2


Maestrobjwa
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, IUsedToHateCold said:

I believe

In a storm I felt was going to be a hit a week ago
In a storm nobody thought was possible
In a Nat 20 out of nowhere
In models that are trending in the right direction for once
In a chance for an HECS
00z is when we're going to reel it in. 
@bncho's riveting pbp

Bring it home. 

probably retiring from PBP. if randy says I suck i must really suck

  • Haha 3
  • Sad 2
  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Now perhaps this isn't for this thread oer se, but perhaps still on topic...how do you calculate those ratios? Layman question, lol

Use a blend of model guidance which have their own ratio calculations and apply weights. We do that ourselves as the forecaster. I look at soundings and lots of other variables to create my own in-house SLR output which starts from the NBM and work from there. It’s a cool process and a lot of work, but we use every tool in the toolbox sometimes! 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Imgoinhungry said:

Would snow depth maps be a better use for this storm? Cut the accumulations on the 10:1 maps in half for this event? Or would that be over doing it?


.

I think there’s going to be quite a range of ratios. If you’re in the coastal CCB or the core of the IVT, 10-12:1 probably? Maybe better? Outside of that more like 8:1? But maybe as low as 5:1 in warm spots with poor rates?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there’s going to be quite a range of ratios. If you’re in the coastal CCB or the core of the IVT, 10-12:1 probably? Maybe better? Outside of that more like 8:1? But maybe as low as 5:1 in warm spots with poor rates?

Yea, makes sense. Thanks.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Not speaking of the NBM specifically, but rather ratios in general- some of the modeled soundings show very impressive vertical lift(omega) through the DGZ with surface temps at 32 over this way at certain points in the storm- how high could the ratios be in that scenario? 15-1 maybe?

I believe I had your ratios at the storm height around 10-12:1, but there could easily banding that eclipses that. 15:1 max within a CCB banded structure or within the norlun trough is plausible, but I would lean towards 8-10:1 storm average overall. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, IronTy said:

I've never noticed them before, do you know what the two thick black lines in the graphic represent

Era, duh nevermind now I see how they've broken it into three zones.

It was answered below. I’m at a Wizards game watching them figure out how to lose.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CAPE said:

Not sure its that warm. It was mostly frozen a week or so ago.

As of Thursday this week on my way home frome work, it was open with very little ice floating around by the bay bridge.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, 21z Rap is no slouch either. Plenty more to go after this panel with a nice bowling ball of circled 500mb Heights to the west yet to come through. And if scroll back to an earlier panel you notice that in the last panel attached a new slp is starting to reform tucked in along the coast. That's what the Gfs had in its first bomb of 2-4'!

ref1km_ptype.us_ma (9).png

snku_acc-imp.us_ma - 2026-02-20T203941.723.png

  • Like 3
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 87storms said:

I like that look more than any other model I’ve seen. Most of them have Frederick on the western envelope of the goods.

A lot of that comes down to the initial advance of precip before the coastal takes over. Few of the other models are giving that much of a thought, and from the looks of it the HRRR is actually wetter with that batch than even the GFS.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...