Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,649
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    BroadWing3544
    Newest Member
    BroadWing3544
    Joined

The Allsnow Blizzard of 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

So like the gfs to shit the bed after leading the way for a week. It couldn't handle the pressure 

Slept late today and just getting caught up, but I'm not shocked to see that the models lowered amounts. We knew that while we couldn't discount them, it was possible that the few models that were showing the monster amounts were wrong. We've seen a lot of Euro and RGEM runs showing the much lower amounts. That's why I never went nuts and said 12 to 16 inches for our area. I'm wondering now though if it should be lowered to 10 to 14. Still going to be a great storm. I see HRRR and NAM3km give us close to 15 which would be great. Hopefully everyone knows to never get excited by the RIDICULOUSLY bad regular NAM. That model is a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

What are your thoughts on the GFS and general model cut-backs? Could the further south solution be due to the warmer water temps being south?

This will have to be watched. I suspect things will level off and we'll wind up with around 1.50" QPF in much of the area. I still think 14"-20" is plausible for BDR at this time, unless the shift continues through the 18z cycle. Let's see where things are at 18z. If the storm develops explosively, one will see higher than 12:1 ratios even with the wind, especially where the banding sets up. The mesoscale models will provide insight into banding, frontogenic forcing, etc.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

I still lean near the low end.  Above the RGEM but below many others.  Maybe 12-16 near NYC though obviously if a February 06 band sets up that goes out the window, but there is always risk of that

I like 12-18 now for nyc

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

who can explain why most of the models are shifting east with totals all of a sudden - what is it being caused by ? I can't figure it out - could it be any mixing issues or  dry slots ?

Not mixing issues or dry slots, but the most intense precipitation is over the Delmarvala.  Unless this thing sits a while, it may be gone too quick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who can explain why most of the models are shifting east with totals all of a sudden - what is it being caused by ? I can't figure it out - could it be any mixing issues or  dry slots ?

Only the Globals are doing this and they usually do this right as the storm starts.

Here's a nice new snow map. Maybe it can help people off the ledge.
666d7cdd2d53d7a9d69522bbb7945036.jpg


.
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

I like 12-18 now for nyc

a foot on the ground in NYC is a great storm, and to be honest any more than that is just crippling and over burdensome

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psv88 said:

North and west posters are on the bubble but that’s to be expected. This is largely a coastal event for maximum impacts 

The areas you’re talking about are under blizzard warnings for 18-25”. So… if the latest models of 6-10 were to pan out; that would be quite the bust for those areas. I have said that I thought those numbers were insanely high and don’t account for the possible shifts we’re seeing, but I’m also not the NWS so we’ll see

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jt17 said:


Only the Globals are doing this and they usually do this right as the storm starts.

Here's a nice new snow map. Maybe it can help people off the ledge.
666d7cdd2d53d7a9d69522bbb7945036.jpg


.

It's not only the globals. HRRR last night had my area getting close to 2 feet, but now it's 15. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BoulderWX said:

The areas you’re talking about are under blizzard warnings for 18-25”. So… if the latest models of 6-10 were to pan out; that would be quite the bust for those areas. I have said that I thought those numbers were insanely high and don’t account for the possible shifts we’re seeing, but I’m also not the NWS so we’ll see

Are they riding the nbm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM did cut back too but in fairness anyone who’s followed it for years knew it would lol. 

Yes to 2.2 inches of QPF for nyc lol - I think 1.4-2 inches of QPF is a pretty safe bet for the area. Banding and ratios will determine the best spots.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, winterwx21 said:

It's not only the globals. HRRR last night had my area getting close to 2 feet, but now it's 15. 

we've seen this movie before; at least i have. so we go from historic to just a snow storm. what can you do, these models were spitting out the end of the world last night. there is an upper limit to snow here, and we should always keep that in mind, how rare 2 foot plus really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Historic” was the kiss of death. However, It would have been a lot more painful if this was the only opportunity for snow this winter. Mother Nature is one fickle “bleep”. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...