Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,007
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

The Allsnow Blizzard of 2026


Rjay
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

And therein lies part of the problem. People have been calling this a historic storm now for 24 hours before even a flake falls.
 

 I'm not even sure what the word historic means anymore, to break into the top 20 the city needs 15.4 inches from the storm. Would that be historic? If they get 15.3 is that not historic? They got 11.4 inches last month so if they get 11.3 is that a bust? 
 

I get the excitement and I hope it is a great storm, but people calling a storm historic before anything happens.......

I thought it’s mostly historic cuz of the strength and wind. The snow totals other than the NAM/GFS haven’t been that historic for NYC. It’ll be a historic snowfall for the NJ coast. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jt17 said:


You like looking at 3 models with the lowest totals and selectively forgetting the models that do show more and deciding that's your forecast. They like to see a sub 970 low crawling up the coast and chilling by Atlantic City and extrapolate that the higher end of model guidance is more likely since that should dump a ton of snow.


.

As of latest cycle there is not one model that paints 20+ for all of nj, nyc, and Long Island. Only the NAM had that to begin with. 
 

all I’m saying is their isn’t support for those numbers as “expected” especially in the western part of the area - when all short range models have scaled back and come closer to the globals. 
 

going to be an amazing storm. Just keeping it real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, North and West said:

Every time, no matter what happens, remember it is out of our control. All of it is. No matter if it surprises or disappoints, you can’t change it. Maybe you want to prove you’re smarter or better one or another, but no matter what you think, you have no impact on the final outcome. Enjoy the journey.


.

this. its just all the people who downplayed it, well, can you blame them? storm hasn't gotten going yet, so we wait for nws to start dropping totals and making excuses. and, its really hard to get a blockbuster in cnj in late feb....boston different story. i have no idea what will happen but frankly, at 63 and no garage to keep equipment in, 2 feet is a bit much for me. i've got to dig my stuff out of a shed at the other end of the yard...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RDRY said:

East tics have now taken the heavy band offshore On the GFS. It's 6-8 if that happens.

How is this helpful to anyone? First, 6-8 where? Even if you take the GFS verbatim, it’s pumping out over an inch liquid for a large portion of the forum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Stormlover74 said:

So like the gfs to shit the bed after leading the way for a week. It couldn't handle the pressure 

Slept late today and just getting caught up, but I'm not shocked to see that the models lowered amounts. We knew that while we couldn't discount them, it was possible that the few models that were showing the monster amounts were wrong. We've seen a lot of Euro and RGEM runs showing the much lower amounts. That's why I never went nuts and said 12 to 16 inches for our area. I'm wondering now though if it should be lowered to 10 to 14. Still going to be a great storm. I see HRRR and NAM3km give us close to 15 which would be great. Hopefully everyone knows to never get excited by the RIDICULOUSLY bad regular NAM. That model is a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

What are your thoughts on the GFS and general model cut-backs? Could the further south solution be due to the warmer water temps being south?

This will have to be watched. I suspect things will level off and we'll wind up with around 1.50" QPF in much of the area. I still think 14"-20" is plausible for BDR at this time, unless the shift continues through the 18z cycle. Let's see where things are at 18z. If the storm develops explosively, one will see higher than 12:1 ratios even with the wind, especially where the banding sets up. The mesoscale models will provide insight into banding, frontogenic forcing, etc.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

I still lean near the low end.  Above the RGEM but below many others.  Maybe 12-16 near NYC though obviously if a February 06 band sets up that goes out the window, but there is always risk of that

I like 12-18 now for nyc

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

who can explain why most of the models are shifting east with totals all of a sudden - what is it being caused by ? I can't figure it out - could it be any mixing issues or  dry slots ?

Not mixing issues or dry slots, but the most intense precipitation is over the Delmarvala.  Unless this thing sits a while, it may be gone too quick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...